How does hebb both ‘divide’ and ‘conquer’ speech perception and production?

Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 49-51

  Strijkers, Kristof ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Hebbian learning; Neural computation; Phonology; Semantics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; HEBBIAN LEARNING; HUMAN; LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PHONETICS; SEMANTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 84928984061     PISSN: 23273798     EISSN: 23273801     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2013.852231     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Abeles, M., Prut, Y., Bergman, H., & Vaadia, E. (1994). Synchronization in neuronal transmission and its importance for information processing. Progress in Brain Research, 102, 395–404. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(08)60555-5
2. Artola, A., & Singer, W. (1993). Long-term depression of excitatory synaptic transmission and its relationship to longterm potentiation. Trends in Neurosciences, 16, 480–487. doi:10.1016/0166-2236(93)90081-V
3. Botvinick M. M., Braver T. S., Carter C. S., Barch D. M., Cohen J. D. (2001). Evaluating the demand for control: Anterior cingulate cortex and crosstalk monitoring. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
4. Braitenberg, V. (1978). Cell assemblies in the cerebral cortex. In R. Heim & G. Palm (Eds.), Theoretical approaches to complex systems. (Lecture notes in mathematics, vol. 21) (pp. 171–188). Berlin: Springer.
5. Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 177–208. doi:10.1080/026432997381664
6. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283–321. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
7. Fuster, J. M. (1995). Memory in the cerebral cortex. An empirical approach to neural networks in the human and nonhuman primate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Garagnani, M., Wennekers, T., Pulvermuller, F. (2008). A neuroanatomically grounded Hebbian-learning model of attention-language interactions in the human brain. European Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 492–513. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06015.x
9. Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior. A neurophysiological theory. New York, NY: Wiley.
10. Hickok, G. (2012). Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13, 135–145. doi:10.1038/nrg3118
11. Hickok, G. (in press). The architecture of speech production and the role of the phoneme in speech processing. Language and Cognitive Processes.
12. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38.
13. Mesulam, M. M. (1990). Large-scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory. Annals of Neurology, 28, 597–613. doi:10.1002/ana.410280502
14. Nozari, N., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2011). Is comprehension necessary for error detection? A conflict-based account of monitoring in speech production. Cognitive Psychology, 63, 1–33. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.05.001
15. Palm, G. (1982). Neural assemblies. Heidelberg: Springer.
16. Pulvermuller, P. (1999). Words in the brain’s language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 253–336. doi:10.1017/S0140525X9900182X
17. Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 576–582. doi:10.1038/nrn1706
18. Pulvermuller, F., & Fadiga, L. (2010). Active perception: Sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 351–360. doi:10.1038/nrn2811
19. Tsumoto, T. (1992). Long-term potentiation and long-term depression in the neocortex. Progress in Neurobiology, 39, 209–228. doi:10.1016/0301-0082(92)90011-3
20. Wennekers, T., Garagnani, M., & Pulvermuller, F. (2006). Language models based on Hebbian cell assemblies. Journal of Physiology, Paris, 100, 16–30. doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.09.007