Use of learning media by undergraduate medical students in pharmacology:A prospective cohort study

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2015, Pages

  Gutmann, Joanna ^a   Kühbeck, Felizian ^a   Berberat, Pascal O ^b   Fischer, Martin R ^c   Engelhardt, Stefan ^a   Sarikas, Antonio ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BOOK; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL LEARNING; E-LEARNING; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; MOBILE APPLICATION; ONLINE SYSTEM; PHARMACOLOGY; SELF STUDY; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; STUDY; TEACHING; EDUCATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHARMACOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84928882016     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122624     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Prensky M (2001) Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. Horiz 9: 1-6. Available: http://www. emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/10748120110424816.
2. Tapscott D (1999) Educating the Net Generation. Educ Leadersh 56: 6-11. Available: http://search. ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ581511&site=ehost-live.
3. Frand JL (2000) The information age mindset: Changes in students and implications for higher education. Educ Rev 35: 15-24. Available: https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0051.pdf.
4. Oblinger D, Oblinger JL, Lippincott JK (2005) Educating the net generation. Available: http:// digitalcommons.brockport.edu/bookshelf/272/.
5. Tapscott D (1998) Growing Up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation. Available: http://www.ncsu.edu/ meridian/jan98/feat-6/digital.html.
6. Bennett S, Maton K, Kervin L (2008) The "digital natives" debate: A critical review of the evidence. Br J Educ Technol 39: 775-786. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x
7. Thompson P (2013) The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Comput Educ 65: 12-33. Available: ://WOS:000317455300002\nhttp://ac.els-cdn. com/S0360131513000225/1-s2.0-S0360131513000225-main.pdf?-tid=0c6dece8-1eca-11e4-a254-00000aab0f01&acdnat=1407481566-472742320a3743c2e203843d95679345.
8. Harley D, Henke J, Lawrence S, Miller I, Perciali I, Nasatir D (2006) Use and Users of Digital Resources: A Focus on Undergraduate Education in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Stud High Educ 94720: 326. Available: http://cshe.berkeley.edu/research/digitalresourcestudy/report/.
9. Cooper AL, Elnicki DM (2011) Resource utilisation patterns of third-year medical students. Clin Teach 8: 43-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2010.00393.x PMID: 21324072
10. Leff B, Harper GM (2006) The reading habits of medicine clerks at one medical school: frequency, usefulness, and difficulties. Acad Med 81: 489-494. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000222273.90705.a6 PMID: 16639211
11. Peterson MW, Rowat J, Kreiter C, Mandel J (2004) Medical students' use of information resources: is the digital age dawning? Acad Med 79: 89-95. PMID: 14691004
12. Baudains C, Metters E, Easton G, Booton P (2013) What educational resources are medical students using for personal study during primary care attachments? Educ Prim Care 24: 340-345. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24041098. PMID: 24041098
13. Woody WD, Daniel DB, Baker CA (2010) E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Comput Educ 55: 945-948. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.005
14. Baumgart D (2011) Smartphones in clinical practice, medical education, and research. Arch Intern Med 171: 1294-1296. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2011.320. doi: 10.1001/ archinternmed.2011.320 PMID: 21788549
15. Wallace S, Clark M, White J (2012) "It"s on my iPhone': attitudes to the use of mobile computing devices in medical education, a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open 2: 1-8. Available: http://www. pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3432838&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.
16. Ellaway RH, Fink P, Graves L, Campbell A (2014) Left to their own devices: Medical learners' use of mobile technologies. Med Teach 36: 130-138. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24195445. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.849800 PMID: 24195445
17. Nguyen L, Barton SM, Nguyen LT (2014) iPads in higher education-Hype and hope. Br J Educ Technol. Available: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/bjet.12137. Accessed 21 October 2014.
18. Sandars J, Homer M, Pell G, Croker T (2008) Web 2.0 and social software: the medical student way of e-learning. Med Teach 30: 308-312. doi: 10.1080/01421590701798729 PMID: 18608950
19. Pander T, Pinilla S (2014) The use of Facebook in medical education-A literature review. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 31: 1-19. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4152997/ Accessed 10 November 2014.
20. Glaser BG, Strauss AL (1967) The discovery of grounded theory. Int J Qual Methods 5: 1-10. Available: http://www.ualberta.ca/iiqm/backissues/5-1/pdf/mills.pdf.
21. Maykut P, Morehouse R (1994) Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophical and Practical Guide. doi: 10.4324/9780203485781
22. Statistical Yearbook 2014. German Federal Statistical Office (2014). Metzler Poeschel, Stuttgart, Germany. Available: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/StatistischesJahrbuch/ StatistischesJahrbuchAktuell.html#DownloadsKapitel. Accessed: 15 February 2015.
23. Lust G, Vandewaetere M, Ceulemans E, Elen J, Clarebout G (2011) Tool-use in a blended undergraduate course: In Search of user profiles. Comput Educ 57: 2135-2144. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05. 010
24. Patton M (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Available: http://legacy.oise.utoronto. ca/research/field-centres/ross/ctl1014/Patton1990.pdf.
25. Imhof M, Vollmeyer R, Beierlein C (2007) Computer use and the gender gap: The issue of access, use, motivation, and performance. Comput Human Behav 23: 2823-2837. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.007
26. Broos A (2005) Gender and information and communication technologies (ICT) anxiety: male self-assurance and female hesitation. Cyberpsychol Behav 8: 21-31. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2005.8.21 PMID: 15738690
27. Sánchez-Franco MJ (2006) Exploring the influence of gender on the web usage via partial least squares. Behav Inf Technol 25: 19-36. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01449290500124536. Accessed 27 October 2014.
28. Kozma RB (1991) Learning with Media. Rev Educ Res 61: 179-211. doi: 10.3102/ 00346543061002179
29. Brennan N, Edwards S, Kelly N, Miller A, Harrower L, Mattick K (2014) Qualified doctor and medical students' use of resources for accessing information: What is used and why? Health Info Libr J. doi: 10. 1111/hir.12072
30. Kühbeck F, Engelhardt S, Sarikas A (2014) OnlineTED.com-a novel web-based audience response system for higher education. A pilot study to evaluate user acceptance. GMS Z Med Ausbild 31: 1-13. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com.bibl.proxy.hj.se/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=cookie,ip, uid&db=afh&AN=94930232&site=ehost-live.
31. Robinson T, Cronin T, Ibrahim H, Jinks M, Molitor T, Newman J, et al. (2013) Smartphone use and acceptability among clinical medical students: a questionnaire-based study. J Med Syst 37: 9936. Available: http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=23526127&retmode= ref&cmd=prlinks. doi: 10.1007/s10916-013-9936-5 PMID: 23526127
32. Payne KFB, Wharrad H, Watts K (2012) Smartphone and medical related App use among medical students and junior doctors in the United Kingdom (UK): a regional survey. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 12: 121. Available: http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id= 23110712&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-121 PMID: 23110712
33. Davies BS, Rafique J, Vincent TR, Fairclough J, Packer MH, Vincent R, et al. (2012) Mobile Medical Education (MoMEd)-how mobile information resources contribute to learning for undergraduate clinical students: a mixed methods study. BMC Med Educ 12: 1. Available: http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=22240206&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-1 PMID: 22240206
34. Sandars J, Morrison C (2007) What is the Net Generation? The challenge for future medical education. Med Teach 29: 85-88. Available: http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom= pubmed&id=17701615&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks. PMID: 17701615
35. Briscoe GW, Fore Arcand LG, Lin T, Johnson J, Rai A, Kollins MK (2006) Students' and residents' perceptions regarding technology in medical training. Acad Psychiatry 30: 470-479. Available: http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list-uids=17139018. PMID: 17139018