메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 107-132

Proportionality and discretion in international and European law

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 84928860929     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511495076.006     Document Type: Chapter
Times cited : (17)

References (21)
  • 1
    • 44449178641 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Recent developments in the principle of proportionality in european community law
    • E. Ellis, Oxford: Hart
    • F. Jacobs, ‘Recent Developments in the Principle of Proportionality in European Community Law’, in E. Ellis (ed.), The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe (Oxford: Hart, 1999), p. 20.
    • (1999) The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe , pp. 20
    • Jacobs, F.1
  • 2
    • 84928877495 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Influence of the European Principle of Proportionality upon UK law
    • Lord Hoffmann, ‘The Influence of the European Principle of Proportionality upon UK law’ p. 109.
    • Hoffmann, L.1
  • 3
    • 26844566540 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The margin of appreciation doctrine in the european court ofhuman rights
    • M. Hutchinson, ‘The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in the European Court ofHuman Rights’ (1999) 48 ICLQ 638-649.
    • (1999) ICLQ , vol.48 , pp. 638-649
    • Hutchinson, M.1
  • 6
    • 0003084474 scopus 로고
    • The forms and limits of adjudication
    • Lon Fuller, ‘The Forms and Limits of Adjudication’ (1978) 92 Harvard Law Review 353.
    • (1978) Harvard Law Review , vol.92 , pp. 353
    • Fuller, L.1
  • 7
    • 79957861420 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Unreasonableness and proportionality in uk law
    • E. Ellis
    • P. Craig, ‘Unreasonableness and Proportionality in UK Law’, in E. Ellis (ed.) The Principle of Proportionality, p. 85, 101-2.
    • The Principle of Proportionality
    • Craig, P.1
  • 9
    • 85010089442 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Proportionality and variable intensity of review
    • J. Rivers, ‘Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review’, (2006) 65 Cambridge Law Journal (CLJ) 74.
    • (2006) Cambridge Law Journal (CLJ) , vol.65 , pp. 74
    • Rivers, J.1
  • 10
    • 0004201141 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press
    • P. Craig and G. De Burca, EU Law, 3rd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), p. 372.
    • (2003) EU Law , pp. 372
    • Craig, P.1    De Burca, G.2
  • 11
    • 28244489924 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • On balancing and subsumption. A structural comparison
    • R. Alexy, ‘On Balancing and Subsumption. A Structural Comparison’ (2003) 16 Ratio Juris 433.
    • (2003) Ratio Juris , vol.16 , pp. 433
    • Alexy, R.1
  • 12
    • 0038075228 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • J. Rivers, Oxford: Oxford University Press
    • R. Alexy, A Theory of Constitutional Rights, J. Rivers (trans.) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 47-8.
    • (2002) A Theory of Constitutional Rights , pp. 47-48
    • Alexy, R.1
  • 13
    • 85193319069 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Proportionality, discretion and the second law of balancing
    • G. Pavlakos, Oxford: Hart Publishing, (forthcoming)
    • J. Rivers, ‘Proportionality, Discretion and the Second Law of Balancing’, in G. Pavlakos (ed.), Law, Rights and Discourse: Themes from the Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy(Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2007). (forthcoming).
    • (2007) Law, Rights and Discourse: Themes from the Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy
    • Rivers, J.1
  • 17
    • 0003862925 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Marvellous richness of diversity or insidious cultural relativism?
    • P. Mahoney, ‘Marvellous Richness of Diversity or Insidious Cultural Relativism?’ (1998) 19 HRLJ 1.
    • (1998) HRLJ , vol.19 , pp. 1
    • Mahoney, P.1
  • 18
    • 84928877498 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Proportionality and the european convention on human rights
    • Ellis
    • J. McBride, ‘Proportionality and the European Convention on Human Rights’, in Ellis (ed.), The Principle of Proportionality, p. 23.
    • The Principle of Proportionality
    • Mc Bride, J.1
  • 20
    • 84928877499 scopus 로고
    • The Principle of Proportionality and its Application in EC Law
    • G. de Burca, ‘The Principle of Proportionality and its Application in EC Law’ (1993) 13.
    • (1993) , vol.13
    • De Burca, G.1
  • 21
    • 84873302602 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Judicial review, intensity and deference in eu law
    • D. Dyzenhaus, Portland, Oregon: Hart
    • P. Craig, ‘Judicial Review, Intensity and Deference in EU Law’, in D. Dyzenhaus (ed.), The Unity of Public Law (Portland, Oregon: Hart, 2004), p. 335.
    • (2004) The Unity of Public Law
    • Craig, P.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.