Surface and interfacial analysis of sandblasted and acid-etched enamel for bonding orthodontic adhesives

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 147, Issue 4, 2015, Pages S64-S75

  Patcas, Raphael ^a   Zinelis, Spiros ^b   Eliades, George ^b   Eliades, Theodore ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; BRACKET ADHESIVE; CALCIUM; OXYGEN; PHOSPHORIC ACID; PHOSPHORUS; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; TRANSBOND XT LIGHT CURE ADHESIVE PRIMER;

CHEMISTRY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ETCHING; DEVICES; ELECTRON PROBE MICROANALYSIS; ENAMEL; HUMAN; ORTHODONTIC BRACKET; PROCEDURES; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE PROPERTY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ALUMINUM OXIDE; CALCIUM; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL ETCHING; ELECTRON PROBE MICROANALYSIS; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LIGHT-CURING OF DENTAL ADHESIVES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; OXYGEN; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; PHOSPHORUS; RESIN CEMENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84928799421     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.01.014     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34: 849-53.
2. Black RB. Technic for nonmechanical preparation of cavities and prophylaxis. J Am Dent Assoc 1945;32:955-65.
3. Ibe D, Segner D. Improvement in the adhesive strength of orthodontic brackets on unit-cast and fired dental alloys by microsandblasting. J Orofac Orthop 1995;56:110-7.
4. Jost-Brinkmann PG, Can S, Drost C. In-vitro study of the adhesive strengths of brackets on metals, ceramic and composite. Part 2: bonding to porcelain and composite resin. J Orofac Orthop 1996;57:132-41.
5. Jost-Brinkmann PG, Drost C, Can S. In-vitro study of the adhesive strengths of brackets on metals, ceramic and composite. Part 1: bonding to precious metals and amalgam. J Orofac Orthop 1996;57:76-87.
6. Newman GV, Newman RA, Sun BI, Ha JL, Ozsoylu SA. Sandblasting, silanating, and coatings: their effects on bond strength of metal brackets: an in vitro study. J N J Dent Assoc 1995;66: 15-7:20, 22-3.
7. Newman GV, Sun BC, Ozsoylu SA, Newman RA. Update on bonding brackets: an in vitro survey. J Clin Orthod 1994;28: 396-402.
8. Sperber RL, Watson PA, Rossouw PE, Sectakof PA. Adhesion of bonded orthodontic attachments to dental amalgam: in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:506-13.
9. Brauchli L, Muscillo T, Steineck M, Wichelhaus A. Influence of enamel conditioning on the shear bond strength of different adhesives. J Orofac Orthop 2010;71:411-20.
10. Robles-Ruíz JJ, Ciamponi AL, Medeiros IS, Kanashiro LK. Effect of lingual enamel sandblasting with aluminum oxide of different particle sizes in combination with phosphoric acid etching on indirect bonding of lingual brackets. Angle Orthod 2014;84:1068-73.
11. Turkoz C, Ulusoy C. Evaluation of different enamel conditioning techniques for orthodontic bonding. Korean J Orthod 2012;42: 32-8.
12. Pakshir HR, Zarif Najafi H, Hajipour S. Effect of enamel surface treatment on the bond strength of metallic brackets in rebonding process. Eur J Orthod 2012;34:773-7.
13. Borsatto MC, Catirse AB, Palma Dibb RG, Nascimento TN, Rocha RA, Corona SA. Shear bond strength of enamel surface treated with air-abrasive system. Braz Dent J 2002;13:175-8.
14. Reisner KR, Levitt HL, Mante F. Enamel preparation for orthodontic bonding: a comparison between the use of a sandblaster and current techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111: 366-73.
15. Wiechmann D. Lingual orthodontics (part 3): intraoral sandblasting and indirect bonding. J Orofac Orthop 2000;61:280-91.
16. Canay S, Kocadereli I, Akça E. The effect of enamel air abrasion on the retention of bonded metallic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:15-9.
17. Halpern RM, Rouleau T. The effect of air abrasion preparation on the shear bond strength of an orthodontic bracket bonded to enamel. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:224-7.
18. Suma S, Anita G, Chandra Shekar BR, Kallury A. The effect of air abrasion on the retention of metallic brackets bonded to fluorosed enamel surface. Indian J Dent Res 2012;23:230-5.
19. Mati M, Amm E, Bouserhal J, Bassil-Nassif N. Effects of buccal and lingual enamel sandblasting on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a self-etching primer. Int Orthod 2012; 10:422-31.
20. Cal-Neto JP, Castro S, Moura PM, Ribeiro D, Miguel JAM. Influence of enamel sandblasting prior to etching on shear bond strength of indirectly bonded lingual appliances. Angle Orthod 2010;81:149-52.
21. Miles PG. Does microetching enamel reduce bracket failure when indirect bonding mandibular posterior teeth? Aust Orthod J 2008;24:1-4.
22. Gwinnett AJ. Acid etching for composite resins. Dent Clin North Am 1981;25:271-89.
23. Gwinnett AJ. Structure and composition of enamel. Oper Dent 1992;(Suppl 5):10-7.
24. Arakawa Y, Takahashi Y, Sebata M. The effect of acid etching on the cervical region of the buccal surface of the human premolar, with special reference to direct bonding techniques. Am J Orthod 1979;76:201-8.
25. Kanemura N, Sano H, Tagami J. Tensile bond strength to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surfaces. J Dent 1999;27: 523-30.
26. Espinar-Escalona E, Barrera-Mora JM, Llamas-Carreras JM, Solano-Reina E, Rodríguez D, Gil FJ. Improvement in adhesion of the brackets to the tooth by sandblasting treatment. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2012;23:605-11.
27. Rogers MB, Andrews LJ 2nd. Dependable technique for bonding a 3 × 3 retainer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:231-3.
28. Silverstone LM, Saxton CA, Dogon IL, Fejerskov O. Variation in the pattern of acid etching of human dental enamel examined by scanning electron microscopy. Caries Res 1975;9:373-87.
29. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Etched enamel structure and topography: interface with materials. In: Eliades G, Watts DC, Eliades T, editors. Dental hard tissus and bonding-interfacial phenomena and related properties. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2005. p. 3-33.
30. Whitehead SA, Shearer AC, Watts DC, Wilson NH. Comparison of two stylus methods for measuring surface texture. Dent Mater 1999;15:79-86.
31. Whitehead SA, Lo LY, Watts DC, Wilson NH. Changes of surface texture of enamel in vivo. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:449-53.
32. Al Jabbari YS, Zinelis S, Eliades G. Effect of sandblasting conditions on alumina retention in representative dental alloys. Dent Mater J 2012;31:249-55.
33. Olsen ME, Bishara SE, Damon P, Jakobsen JR. Comparison of shear bond strength and surface structure between conventional acid etching and air-abrasion of human enamel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:502-6.
34. van Waveren Hogervorst WL, Feilzer AJ, Prahl-Andersen B. The airabrasion technique versus the conventional acid-etching technique: a quantification of surface enamel loss and a comparison of shear bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 117:20-6.