The effect of air abrasion preparation on the shear bond strength of an orthodontic bracket bonded to enamel

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 224-227

  Halpern, Richard M ^a   Rouleau, Tanya ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^b CAROLINAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RESIN CEMENT; TRANSBOND PLUS SELF ETCHING PRIMER; TRANSBOND PLUS SELF-ETCHING PRIMER;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENAMEL; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; SHEAR STRENGTH;

AIR ABRASION, DENTAL; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; RESIN CEMENTS; SHEAR STRENGTH;

EID: 77950241678     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: 14602210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjp080     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Black R B 1945 Technic for nonmechanical preparation of cavities and prophylaxis. Journal of the American Dental Association 32: 955-965
2. Borsatto M C, Catirse A B, Palma Dibb R G, Nascimento T N, Rocha R A, Corona S A 2002 Shear bond strength of enamel surface treated with air-abrasive system. Brazilian Dental Journal 13: 175-178
3. Brown J R, Barkmeier W W 1996 A comparison of six enamel treatment procedures for sealant bonding. Pediatric Dentistry 18: 29-31
4. Buonocore M G 1955 A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. Journal of Dental Research 34: 849-853
5. Canay S, Kocadereli I, Aka E 2000 The effect of enamel air abrasion on the retention of bonded metallic orthodontic brackets. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 117: 15-19
6. Gorelick L, Geiger A M, Gwinnett A J 1984 Implications of the failure rates of bonded brackets and eyelets: a clinical study. American Journal of Orthodontics 86: 403-406
7. Kanellis M J, Warren J J, Levy S M 1997 Comparison of air abrasion versus acid etch sealant techniques: six-month retention. Pediatric Dentistry 19: 258-261
8. Kozlovsky A, Artzi Z, Nemcovsky C E, Hirshberg A 2005 Effect of air-polishing devices on the gingiva: histologic study in the canine. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 32: 329-334
9. Matos A B, Tate W H, Powers J M 2003 Influence of enamel surface preparation on composite bond strength. American Journal of Dentistry 16: 37A-40A
10. Mujdeci A, Gokay O 2004 The effect of airborne-particle abrasion on the shear bond strength of four restorative materials to enamel and dentin. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 92: 245-249
11. Nikaido T, Kataumi M, Burrow M F, Inokoshi S, Yamada T, Takatsu T 1996 Bond strengths of resin to enamel and dentin treated with low-pressure air abrasion. Operative Dentistry 21: 218-224
12. Olsen M E, Bishara S E, Damon P, Jakobsen J R 1997 Comparison of shear bond strength and surface structure between conventional acid etching and air-abrasion of human enamel. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 112: 502-506
13. Peruchi C, Santos-Pinto L, Santos-Pinto A, Barbosa e Silva E 2002 Evaluation of cutting patterns produced in primary teeth by an air-abrasion system. Quintessence International 33: 279-283
14. Roeder L B, Berry E A, You C, Powers J M 1995 Bond strength of composite to air-abraded enamel and dentin. Operative Dentistry 20: 186-190
15. van Waveren Hogervorst W L, Feilzer A J, Prahl-Andersen B 2000 The air-abrasion technique versus the conventional acid-etching technique: a quantification of surface enamel loss and a comparison of shear bond strength. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 117: 20-26
16. Wright G Z, Hatibovic-Kofman S, Millenaar D W, Braverman I 1999 The safety and efficacy of treatment with air abrasion technology. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 9: 133-140