Improvement in adhesion of the brackets to the tooth by sandblasting treatment

Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 605-611

  Espinar Escalona, Eduardo ^a   Barrera Mora, José María ^a   Llamas Carreras, José María ^a   Solano Reina, Enrique ^a   Rodriguez D ^b   Gil, F J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABRASIVE PARTICLES; ALUMINA PARTICLES; BIOMEDICAL MATERIAL; CONTACT SURFACE AREA; CONTROL SAMPLES; IN-VITRO; NATURAL TEETH; ORTHODONTIC THERAPY; ORTHODONTIC TREATMENTS; SELF-CURING; TEETH SURFACE; TENSILE TESTS; UNIVERSAL TESTING MACHINES;

ABRASIVES; ALUMINA; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; DENTAL ORTHOSES; FASTENERS; SILICON CARBIDE; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; SURFACE TREATMENT; TENSILE TESTING; TOOTH ENAMEL;

ADHESION;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; SILICON;

ABRASIVE BLASTING; ADHESION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL PROCEDURE; ENAMEL; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VITRO STUDY; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCEDURES; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADHESIVENESS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL ETCHING; HUMANS; INTERFEROMETRY; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; RESIN CEMENTS; SHEAR STRENGTH; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEMPERATURE; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 84863498860     PISSN: 09574530     EISSN: 15734838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10856-011-4509-y     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Schmage P, Nergiz I, Herrmann W, Ozcan M. Influence of var-ious surface-conditioning methods on the bond strength of metal brackets to ceramic surfaces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123(5):540-6.
2. Cochran D, O'keefe KL, Turner DT, Powers JM. Bond strength of orthodontic composite cement to treated porcelain. Am J Or-thod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111(3):297-300.
3. Silverstone LM. In: Dogon L, editor. The acid etch technique: in vitro study with special reference to the enamel surface and the enamel-resin interface. Minnesota: St. Paul; 1975.
4. Sargison AE, Mccabe JF, Millett DT. A laboratory investigation to compare enamel preparation by sandblasting or acid etching prior to bracket bonding. Br J Orthod. 1999;26(2):141-6.
5. Siomka LV, Powers JM. In vitro bond strength oftreated direct-bonding metal bases. Am J Orthod. 1995;88:133-6.
6. Sonis AL. Air abrasion of failed bonded metal brackets: a study of shear bond strength and surface characteristics as determined by scanning electron microscopy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:96-8.
7. Dasch W, Turner DS, Powers JM. Bond strength of a light-cured glass ionomer orthodontic adhesive. J Dent Res. 1993;72:224-5.
8. Wright WL, Powers JM. In vitro tensile bond strength of reconditioned brackets. Am J Orthod. 1985;87:247-52.
9. Egan FR, Alexander SA, Cartwright GE. Bond strength of reb-onded brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109: 64-70.
10. Black RB. Air-abrasive: some fundamentals. J Am Dent Assoc. 1950;40:701-10.
11. Millett D, Mccabe JF, Gordon PH. The role of sandblasting on the retention of metallic brackets applied with glass ionomer cement. Br J Orthod. 1993;20(2):117-222.
12. Regan D, Lemasney B, Van-Noort R. The tensile bond strength of new and rebonded stainless steel orthodontic brackets. Eur J Orthod. 1993;15(2):125-35.
13. Miller S, Zernik JH. Sandblasting of bands to increase bond strength. J Clini Orthod. 1996;30:217-22.
14. Jost-Brinkmann PG, Miethke RR, Appenzeller AH. An in vitro study on improving the bonding strength of steel bands with the use of glass ionomer cements. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1993;54: 148-55.
15. Zachrisson YO, Zachrisson BU, Buyukyilmaz T. Surface prepa-ration for orthodontic bonding to porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109(4):420-30.
16. Cochran D, O'keefe KL, Turner DT. Bond strength forthodontics composite cement to treated porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111:297-300.
17. López Barajas L, Canut Brusola JA. In vitro comparison of the retention capacity of new aesthetics brackets. Eur J Orthod. 1999;21:71-7.
18. Maccoll GA, Rossouw PE, Titley KC, Yamin C. The relationship between bond strength and orthodontic bracket base surface area with conventional and microetched foil-mesh bases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113(3):276-81.
19. Shahverdi S, Canay S, Sahin E, Bilge A. Effects of different surface treatment methods on the bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25:699-705.
20. Nergiz I, Schmage P, Herrmann W, Ozcan M. Effect of alloy type and surface conditioning on roughness and bond strength of metal brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;125(1):42-50.
21. Cotton Wilkinsson J. In: Limusa, editor. Advanced Inorganic Chemistry. New York: Wiley; 1990.
22. Cochran D, O'keefe KL, Turner DT, Powers JM. Bond strength of orthodontic composite cement to treated porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;111(3):297-300.
23. Sharma-Sayal SK, Rossouw PE, Kulkarni GV, Titley KC. The influence of orthodontic bracket base design on shear bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124(1):74-82.