Meeting the climate change challenge (MC3): The role of the internet in climate change research dissemination and knowledge mobilization

Environmental Communication

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 208-227

  Newell, Robert ^a   Dale, Ann ^a  

^a ROYAL ROADS UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

climate change; Internet; knowledge mobilization; peer learning; social media

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928762472     PISSN: 17524032     EISSN: 17524040     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17524032.2014.993412     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Anderson, S. P., & De Palma, A. (2012). Competition for attention in the information (overload) age. The RAND Journal of Economics, 43(1), 1-25.
2. Biggar, J., & Middleton, C. (2010). Broadband and network environmentalism: The case of One Million Acts of Green. Telecommunications Journal of Australia, 60(1), 9.1-9.17. doi:10.2104/tja10009
3. Bik, H. M., & Goldstein, M. C. (2013). An introduction to social media for scientists. PLoS Biology, 11, e1001535. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001535
4. Beamer, G. (2002). Elite interviews and state politics research. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 2(1), 86-96. doi:10.1177/153244000200200106
5. Berkhout, T., & Westerhoff, L. (2013). Local energy systems: Evaluating network effectiveness for transformation in British Columbia, Canada. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31, 841-857. doi:10.1068/c11267
6. Burch, S., Herbert, Y., & Robinson, J. (2014). Meeting the climate change challenge: A scan of greenhouse gas emissions in BC communities. Local Environment, 14, 1-19. doi:10.1080/13549839.2014.902370
7. Chilvers, J. (2013). Reflexive engagement? Actors, learning, and reflexivity in public dialogue on science and technology. Science Communication, 35, 283-310. doi:10.1177/1075547012454598
8. Dale, A. (2001). At the edge: Sustainable development in the 21st century. Vancouver: UBC Press.
9. Dale, A. (2005). A perspective on the evolution of e-dialogues concerning interdisciplinary research on sustainable development in Canada. Ecology & Society, 10(1), 1-9.
10. Dale, A., & Newman, L. (2006). E-dialogues: A role in interactive sustainable development? The Integrated Assessment Journal, Bridging Sciences and Policy, 6(4), 131-141.
11. Dale, A., Robinson, J., Herbert, Y., & Shaw, A. (2013). Climate change adaptation and mitigation: An action agenda for BC decision-makers. Developed through the Meeting the Climate Change Challenge research partnership. Royal Roads University, University of British Columbia, and Simon Fraser University. Retrieved April 22, 2013, from http://mc3.royalroads.ca/sites/default/files/webfiles/MC3%20Climate%20Action%20Agenda.pdf
12. Deutskens, E., De Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M., & Oosterveld, P. (2004). Response rate and response quality of Internet-based surveys: An experimental study. Marketing Letters, 15(1), 21-36. doi:10.1023/B:MARK.0000021968.86465.00
13. Durant, J. (1999). Participatory technology assessment and the democratic model of the public understanding of science. Science and Public Policy, 26, 313-319. doi:10.3152/147154399781782329
14. Easterling, D. R., Meehl, G. A., Parmesan, C., Changnon, S. A., Karl, T. R., & Mearns, L. O. (2000). Climate extremes: Observations, modeling, and impacts. Science, 289, 2068-2074. doi:10.1126/science.289.5487.2068
15. Few, R., Brown, K., & Tompkins, E. L. (2007). Public participation and climate change adaptation: Avoiding the illusion of inclusion. Climate Policy, 7(1), 46-59. doi:10.1080/14693062.2007.9685637
16. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
17. Galloway, L. M., & Rauh, A. E. (2013). Social media and citation metrics. Libraries' and Librarians' Publications. Paper 107. Retrieved from http://surface.syr.edu/sul/107
18. Girvetz, E., Zganjar, C., Raber, G., Maurer, E., Kareiva, P., & Lawler, J. (2009). Applied climate-change analysis: The climate wizard tool. Plos One, 4(12), e8320. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008320
19. Gommans, M., Krishnan, K. S., & Scheffold, K. B. (2001). From brand loyalty to e-loyalty: A conceptual framework. Journal of Economic and Social Research, 3(1), 43-58.
20. Hoffman, A. J. (2011). The growing climate divide. Nature Climate Change, 1, 195-196. doi:10.1038/nclimate1144
21. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4): Climate Change 2007. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Korkmaz, O. (2009). Primary perceptual field in visual materials. The Social Sciences, 4, 525-533.
23. Kristensen, F. (2012). Eagle Island. Meeting the climate change challenge (MC3). Online case study. Vancouver: Royal Roads University, University of British Columbia, and Simon Fraser University. Retrieved November 22, 2012, from http://www.mc-3.ca/eagle-island
24. Kurtz, C. F., & Snowden, D. J. (2003). The new dynamics of strategy: Sense making in a complex complicated world. IBM Systems Journal, 42, 462-483. doi:10.1147/sj.423.0462
25. Markowitz, E. M., & Shariff, A. F. (2012). Climate change and moral judgement. Nature Climate Change, 2, 243-247. doi:10.1038/nclimate1378
26. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
27. Newell, R., & King, L. (2012). Prince George. Meeting the climate change challenge (MC3). Online case study. Vancouver: Royal Roads University, University of British Columbia, and Simon Fraser University. Retrieved November 29, 2012, from http://www.mc-3.ca/prince-george
28. Newman, W. L. (2003). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
29. Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12-23. doi:10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23
30. Schultz, U., & Vandenbosch, B. (1998). Information overload in a groupware environment: Now you see it, now you don't. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 8(2), 127-148. doi:10.1207/s15327744joce0802-3
31. Sheehan, K. B. (2001). E-mail survey response rates: A review. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(2), 0. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00117.x
32. Smith, P. J., & Smythe, E. (1999). Globalization, citizenship and technology: The MAI meets the Internet. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 7(2), 83-105. doi:10.1080/11926422.1999.9673213
33. Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Stern, N. (2006). Review on the economics of climate change. London: HM Treasury.
35. Wenkel, K., Berg, M., Mirschel, W., Wieland, R., Nendel, C., & Köstner, B. (2013). LandCaRe DSS - An interactive decision support system for climate change impact assessment and the analysis of potential agricultural land use adaptation strategies. Journal of Environmental Management, 127, S168-S183. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.02.051
36. Wynne, B. (2006). Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science-hitting the notes, but missing the music? Public Health Genomics, 9(3), 211-220.
37. Yaveroglu, I., & Donthu, N. (2008). Advertising repetition and placement issues in on-line environments. Journal of Advertising, 37(2), 31-43. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367370203
38. Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.