Recording and Accounting for Stakeholder Involvement in Systematic Reviews

Health Information and Libraries Journal

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 95-106

  Saan, Marieke C ^a   Boeije, Hennie R ^a   Sattoe, Jane N T ^b,c   Bal, Marjolijn I ^b,d   Missler, Marjolein ^e   van Wesel, Floryt ^f  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b ROTTERDAM UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^c ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^f VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Decision support; Practice guidelines; Review, literature; Review, systematic; Review, systematic, qualitative

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER; HUMAN; LEADERSHIP; LIBRARIAN; LITERATURE; UTILIZATION;

CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; HUMANS; LEADERSHIP; LIBRARIANS; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 84928717926     PISSN: 14711834     EISSN: 14711842     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/hir.12099     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Dixon-Woods, M., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D. R., Miller, T., Sutton, A. J., Shaw, R. L., Smith, J. A. & Young, B. How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qualitative Research 2006, 6, 27-44. doi:10.1177/1468794106058867.
2. Harden, A. & Thomas, J. Methodological issues in combining diverse study types in systematic reviews. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2005, 8, 257-271. doi:10.1080/13645570500155078.
3. Paterson, B. L. It looks great but how do I know it fits? An introduction to meta-synthesis research. In: Hannes, K. & Lockwood, C. (eds). Synthesizing Qualitative Research, 2012. West-Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012: 1-20.
4. Rees, R. & Oliver, S. Stakeholder perspectives and participation in reviews. In: Gough, D., Oliver, S. & Thomas, J. (eds). An Introduction to Systematic Reviews, 2012. London: Sage, 2012: 17-34.
5. Pope, C., Mays, N. & Popay, J. Synthesizing Qualitative and Quantitative Health Evidence: A Guide to Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2007.
6. Ginsburg, L. R., Lewis, S., Zackheim, L. & Casebeer, A. Revisiting interaction in knowledge translation. Implementation Science 2007, 2, 34. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-2-34.
7. Turner, A. M., Liddy, E. D., Bradley, J. & Wheatley, J. A. Modeling public health interventions for improved access to the gray literature. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2005, 93, 487-494.
8. Pawson, R. Evidence-Based Policy: A Realist Perspective. London: Sage, 2006.
9. McDonald, P. W. & Viehbeck, S. From evidence-based practice making to practice-based evidence making: creating communities of (research) and practice. Circle of Research and Practice 2007, 8, 140-144. doi:10.1177/1524839906298494.
10. Swinkels, A., Briddon, J. & Hall, J. Two physiotherapists, one librarian and a systematic literature review: collaboration in action. Health Information and Libraries Journal 2006, 23, 248-256.
11. Papaioannou, D., Sutton, A., Carroll, C., Booth, A. & Wong, R. Literature searching for social science systematic reviews: consideration of a range of search techniques. Health Information and Libraries Journal 2009, 27, 114-122.
12. Dixon-Woods, M., Booth, A. & Sutton, A. J. Synthesizing qualitative research: a review of published reports. Qualitative Research 2007, 7, 375-422. doi:10.1177/1468794107078517.
13. Hannes, K. & Maicatis, K. A move to more systematic and transparent approaches in qualitative evidence synthesis: update on a review of published papers. Qualitative Research 2012, 12, 402-442. doi:10.1177/1468794111432992.
14. Booth, A. Clear and present questions: formulating questions for evidence based practice. Library Hi Tech 2006, 25, 355-368. doi:10.1108/07378830610692127.
15. Cooke, A., Smith, D. & Booth, A. Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qualitative Health Research 2012, 22, 1435-1443. doi:10.1177/1049732312452938.
16. Shaw, R. L., Booth, A., Sutton, A. J., Miller, T., Smith, J. A., Young, B., Jones, D. R. & Dixon-Woods, M. Finding qualitative research: and evaluation of search strategies. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2004, 4, 5-9.
17. Booth, A., Papaioannou, D. & Sutton, A. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. London: Sage, 2012.
18. van Dijk, J. J. M. Ideological trends within victim movements: an international perspective. In: Maguire, M. & Pointing, J. (eds). Victims of Crime: A new Deal?. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1988: 115-126.
19. Pope, C. & Mays, N. Reaching the parts that other methods cannot reach: an introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. BMJ 1995, 311, 42-45.
20. Britten, N. Qualitative research on health communication: what can it contribute? Patient Education and Counseling 2011, 82, 384-388. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.12.021.
21. Newman, S., Steed, L. & Mulligan, K. Chronic Physical Illness: Self-Management and Behavioural Interventions. New York: Open University Press, 2009.
22. Connell, J., Brazier, J., O'Cathain, A., Lloyd-Jones, M. & Paisley, S. Quality of life of people with mental health problems: a synthesis of qualitative research. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2012, 10, 138. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-10-138.
23. Jones, J. & Hunter, D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ 1995, 311, 376-380.
24. Blank, L., Coster, J., O'Cathain, A., Knowles, E., Tosh, J., Turner, J. & Nicholl, J. The appropriateness of, and compliance with, telephone triage decisions: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2012, 68, 2610-2621. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06052.