Two physiotherapists, one librarian and a systematic literature review: Collaboration in action

Health Information and Libraries Journal

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 248-256

  Swinkels, Annette ^a,b   Briddon, Jason ^b   Hall, Jane ^c  

^a Program in Physical Therapy   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^c ROYAL NATIONAL HOSPITAL FOR RHEUMATIC DISEASES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; COOPERATION; HUMAN; HYDROTHERAPY; LIBRARIAN; LIBRARY SCIENCE; LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; PAIN; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PUBLIC RELATIONS; UNITED KINGDOM;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; HYDROTHERAPY; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; LIBRARIANS; LIBRARY COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT; PAIN; PHYSICAL THERAPY (SPECIALTY); PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; REVIEW LITERATURE;

EID: 34848893008     PISSN: 14711834     EISSN: 14711842     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2006.00689.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Systematic Review. Definitions of systematic review on the world wide web. Available from: http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&q= definition+of+%22systematic+review%22&btnG=Search&meta= (accessed 11 November 2005).
2. Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.5, updated May 2005. Available from: http://www.cochrance.org/ resources/handbook (accessed 10 June 2006).
3. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Report 4, 2nd edn. March 2001. Available from: http://www.york.ac.uk/institute/crd/report4.htm (accessed 26 February 2006).
4. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Guideline Development Process - Information for National Collaborating. Centres and Guideline Development Groups, 2001 item 9, appendix C, p. 3 9. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/pdf/brdnov01item9appc.pdf (accessed 11 November 2005).
5. Evans, D. Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluation healthcare interventions. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2003, 12, 77 84.
6. GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. British Medical Journal 2004, 328, 1490. Available from: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/reprint/328/7454/1490 (accessed. 11 November 2005).
7. Central Office for Research Ethics Committees (COREC) NHS Research Committee Application Form, 2005 section A, part A47. Available from: http://www.corecform.org.uk/AppForm (accessed 11 November 2005).
8. Scherrer, C. S. Dorsch, J. L. The evolving role of the librarian in evidence-based medicine. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 1999, 87, 322 8.
9. Sackett, D. L., Rosenber, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B. Richardson, W. S. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal 1996, 312, 71 2.
10. Mulrow, C. D. Systematic Reviews: rationale for systematic reviews. British Medical Journal 1994, 309, 597 9.
11. Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Effective Practice. Available from: http://www.csp.org.uk/effectivepractice/effectiveness.cfm#research (accessed 30 August 2005).
12. Davies, H. O. Crombie, I. K. Evidence-based medicine, what is a Systematic Review? What Is...? Series, 2004, 1, no. 5. Available from: http://www.evidence-based-medicine.co.uk/What_is_series.html (accessed 30 August 2005).
13. Humphreys, B. L. Librarians and collaborative research: toward a better scientific base for information practice. Bulletin of the Medical Libraries Association 1996, 83, 433 6.
14. Beverley, C. A., Booth, A. Bath, P. A. The role of the information specialist in the systematic review process: a health information case study. Health Information and Libraries Journal 2003, 20, 65 74.
15. Ansari, W. L., Phillips, C. J. Hammick, M. Collaboration and partnerships: developing the evidence base. Health and Social Care in the Community 2001, 9, 215 27.
16. Harris, M. R. The librarian's role in the systematic review process: a case study. Journal of the Medical Libraries Association 2005, 93, 81 7.
17. Hydrotherapy Association of Chartered Physiotherapists. Guidance on Good Practice in Hydrotherapy, Information paper no. 39. London, UK : Chartered Society of Physiotherapy, 2006.
18. Geytenbeek, J. Evidence for effective hydrotherapy. Physiotherapy 2002, 88, 514 29.
19. School of Health and Related Research (Scharr). Systematic Reviews: What are they and why are they useful? Sheffield, UK : Sheffield University, 2006. Available from: http://www.shef.ac.uk/scharr/ir/units/systrev/definitions.htm (accessed 19 June 2006).
20. Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network (SIGN). SIGN 0: a Guideline Developers' Handbook. Methodology checklist 2: Randomised Controlled Trials. Available from: http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/50/checklist2.html (accessed 20 June 2006).
21. Moher, D., Cook, D. J., Eastwood, S., Olkin, I., Rennie, D. Stroup, D. F. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUORUM statement. The Lancet 1999, 352, 1896 900.
22. Egger, M., Juni, P., Bartlett. C., Holenstein, F. Sterne, J. How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical Study; Health Technology Assessment 2003, 7, 1 75.
23. International Association for the Study of Pain. IASP Pain Terminology. Available from: http://www.iasp-pain.org/terms-p.html (accessed 26 November 2004).
24. Colle, F., Rannou, F., Revel, M., Fermanian, J. Poiraudeau, S. Impact of quality scales on levels of evidence inferred from a systematic review of exercise and back pain. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2002, 38, 1745 52.
25. Katrak, P., Bialocerkowski, A. E., Massy-Westrop, N., Saravana Kumar, V. S. Grimmer, K. A. A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools. BioMed Central 2004, Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471- 2288/4/22 (accessed 10 May 2006).
26. Hall, J., Swinkels, A., Briddon, J. McCabe, C. S. Does hydrotherapy relieve pain? A systematic review and exploration of underlying mechanisms. 35th Congress of the International Society of Medical Hydrology and Climatology, Istanbul, Turkey, 6-10 June, 2006.
27. Swinkels, A., Albarran, J. W., Means, R. I., Mitchell, T. Steward, M. C. Evidence-based practice in health and social care: where are we now?. Journal of Interprofessional Care 2002, 16, 335 47.
28. Florence, V., Giuse, N. B. Ketchell, D. S. Information in context: integrating information specialists into practice settings. Journal of the Medical Libraries Association 2002, 90, 49 5.