Exploiting chemically selective weakness in solids as a route to new porous materials

Nature Chemistry

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 381-388

  Morris, Russell E ^a   Cejka, Jiří ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

^b J HEYROVSKÝ INSTITUTE OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928690338     PISSN: 17554330     EISSN: 17554349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nchem.2222     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Davis, M. E. Ordered porous materials for emerging applications. Nature 417, 813-821 (2002).
2. Primo, A. & Garcia, H. Zeolites as catalysts in oil refining. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 7548-7561 (2014).
3. Ferey, G. Hybrid porous solids: Past, present, future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 191-214 (2008).
4. Kitagawa, S., Kitaura, R. & Noro, S. Functional porous coordination polymers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 2334-2375 (2004).
5. Pophale, R., Cheeseman, P. A. & Deem, M. W. A database of new zeolite-like materials. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 12407-12412 (2011).
6. Earl, D. J. & Deem, M. W. Toward a database of hypothetical zeolite structures. Indust. Eng. Chem. Res. 45, 5449-5454 (2006).
7. Blatov, V. A., Ilyushin, G. D. & Proserpio, D. M. The zeolite conundrum: why are there so many hypothetical zeolites and so few observed? A possible answer from the zeolite-type frameworks perceived as packings of tiles. Chem. Mater. 25, 412-424 (2013).
8. Park, K. S. et al. Exceptional chemical and thermal stability of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10186-10191 (2006).
9. Akporiaye, D. E. & Price, G. D. Relative stability of zeolite frameworks from calculated energetics of known and theoretical structures. Zeolites 9, 321-328 (1989).
10. Henson, N. J., Cheetham, A. K. & Gale, J. D. Theoretical calculations on silica frameworks and their correlation with experiment. Chem. Mater. 6, 1647-1650 (1994).
11. Henson, N. J., Cheetham, A. K. & Gale, J. D. Computational studies of aluminum phosphate polymorphs. Chem. Mater. 8, 664-670 (1996).
12. Hughes, J. T., Bennett, T. D., Cheetham, A. K. & Navrotsky, A. Thermochemistry of zeolitic imidazolate frameworks of varying porosity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 598-601 (2013).
13. Majda, D. et al. Hypothetical zeolitic frameworks: In search of potential heterogeneous catalysts. J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 1040-1047 (2008).
14. Li, Y., Yu, J. & Xu, R. R. Criteria for zeolite frameworks realizable for target synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 1673-1677 (2013).
15. Li, X. & Deem, M. W. Why zeolites have so few seven-membered rings. J. Phys. Chem. C. 118, 15835-15839 (2014).
16. Hartmann, M. Hierarchical zeolites: A proven strategy to combine shape selectivity with efficient mass transport. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 5880-5882 (2004).
17. Armstrong, A. R. & Bruce, P. G. Synthesis of layered LiMnO2 as an electrode for rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature 381, 499-500 (1996).
18. Farha, O. K. et al. De novo synthesis of a metal-organic framework material featuring ultrahigh surface area and gas storage capacities. Nature Chem. 2, 944-948 (2010).
19. Morris, R. E. & Wheatley, P. S. Gas storage in nanoporous materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 4966-4981 (2008).
20. Horike, S., Shimomura, S. & Kitagawa, S. Soft porous crystals. Nature Chem. 1, 695-704 (2009).
21. Horcajada, P. et al. Flexible porous metal-organic frameworks for a controlled drug delivery. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 6774-6780 (2008).
22. Loiseau, T. et al. A rationale for the large breathing of the porous aluminum terephthalate (MIL-53) upon hydration. Chem. Eur. J. 10, 1373-1382 (2004).
23. Serre, C. et al. Very large breathing effect in the first nanoporous chromium(iii)-based solids: MIL-53 or Criii (OH).-O2C-C6H4-CO2}.-HO2C-C6H4-CO2H}x .H2Oy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 13519-13526 (2002).
24. Rabone, J. et al. An adaptable peptide-based porous material. Science 329, 1053-1057 (2010).
25. Low, J. J. et al. Virtual high throughput screening confirmed experimentally: porous coordination polymer hydration. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 15834-15842 (2009).
26. Colombo, V. et al. High thermal and chemical stability in pyrazolate-bridged metal-organic frameworks with exposed metal sites. Chem. Sci. 2, 1311-1319 (2011).
27. Cohen, S. M. Postsynthetic methods for the functionalization of metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Rev. 112, 970-1000 (2012).
28. Wang, Z. & Cohen, S. M. Postsynthetic modification of metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 1315-1329 (2009).
29. Karagiaridi, O., Bury, W., Mondloch, J. E., Hupp, J. T. & Farha, O. K. Solvent-assisted linker exchange: an alternative to the de novo synthesis of unattainable metal-organic frameworks. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 4530-4540 (2014).
30. Kahr, J., Morris, R. E. & Wright, P. A. Post-synthetic incorporation of nickel into CPO-27(M1) to give materials with enhanced permanent porosity. Cryst. Eng. Comm 15, 9779-9786 (2013).
31. Kim, Y. et al. Metal-ion metathesis in metal-organic frameworks: a synthetic route to new metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Eur. J. 18, 16642-16648 (2012).
32. Vermootle, F. et al. Synthesis modulation as a tool to increase the catalytic activity of metal-organic frameworks: The unique case of UiO-66(Zr) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 11465-11468 (2013).
33. Polozij, M., Rubes, M., Cejka, J. & Nachtigall, P. Catalysis by dynamically formed defects in a metal-organic framework structure: Knoevenagel reaction catalyzed by copper benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylate. ChemCatChem 6, 2821-2824 (2014).
34. Lapidus, S. H., Halder, G. J., Chupas, P. J. & Chapman, K. W. Exploiting high pressures to generate porosity, polymorphism, and lattice expansion in the nonporous molecular framework Zn(CN)2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 7621-7628 (2013).
35. Xiao, B. et al. Chemically blockable transformation and ultraselective low-pressure gas adsorption in a non-porous metal organic framework. Nature Chem. 1, 289-294 (2009).
36. Allan, P. K., Xiao, B., Teat, S. J., Knight, J. W. & Morris, R. E. In situ single-crystal diffraction studies of the structural transition of metal-organic framework copper 5-sulfoisophthalate, Cu-SIP-3. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 3605-3611 (2010).
37. Allan, P. K. et al. Pair distribution function-derived mechanism of a single-crystal to disordered to single-crystal transformation in a hemilabile metal-organic framework. Chem. Sci. 3, 2559-2564 (2012).
38. Tian, Y. et al. Synthesis and structural characterization of a single-crystal to single-crystal transformable coordination polymer. Dalton Trans. 43, 1519-1523 (2014).
39. Sarma, D. & Natarajan, S. Usefulness of in situ single crystal to single crystal transformation (SCSC) studies in understanding the temperature-dependent dimensionality cross-over and structural reorganization in copper-containing metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). Cryst. Growth Des. 11, 5415-5423 (2011).
40. Sato, H. et al. Self-accelerating CO sorption in a soft nanoporous crystal. Science 343, 167-170 (2014).
41. Mohideen, M. I. H. et al. Protecting group and switchable pore-discriminating adsorption properties of a hydrophilic-hydrophobic metal-organic framework. Nature Chem. 3, 304-310 (2011).
42. Li, Y. & Yu, J. New stories of zeolite structures: Their descriptions, determinations, predictions, and evaluations. Chem. Rev. 114, 7268-7316 (2014).
43. Agostini, G. et al. In situ XAS and XRPD parametric Rietveld refinement to understand dealumination of Y zeolite catalyst. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 667-678 (2010).
44. Malola, S., Svelle, S., Bleken, F. L. & Swang, O. Detailed reaction paths for zeolite dealumination and desilication from density functional calculations. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 652-655 (2012).
45. Zones, S. I. et al. Studies of aluminum reinsertion into borosilicate zeolites with intersecting channels of 10-and 12-ring channel systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 1462-1471 (2014).
46. Baerlocher, C., Weber, T., McCusker, L. B., Palatinus, L. & Zones, S. I. Unraveling the perplexing structure of the zeolite SSZ-57. Science 333, 1134-1137 (2011).
47. Zones, S. I., Chen, C. Y., Benin, A. & Hwang, S. J. Opportunities for selective catalysis within discrete portions of zeolites: The case for SSZ-57LP. J. Catal. 308, 213-225 (2013).
48. Roth, W. J., Nachtigall, P., Morris, R. E. & Cejka, J. Two-dimensional zeolites: current status and perspectives. Chem. Rev. 114, 4807-4837 (2014).
49. Gil, B. et al. High acidity unilamellar zeolite MCM-56 and its pillared and delaminated derivatives. Dalton Trans. 43, 10501-10511 (2014).
50. Roth, W. J., Gil, B. & Marszalek, B. Comprehensive system integrating 3D and 2D zeolite structures with recent new types of layered geometries. Catal. Today 227, 9-14, (2014).
51. Ouyang, X. et al. Novel surfactant-free route to delaminated all-silica and titanosilicate zeolites derived from a layered borosilicate MWW precursor. Dalton Trans. 43, 10417-10429 (2014).
52. Ouyang, X. et al. Single-step delamination of a MWW borosilicate layered zeolite precursor under mild conditions without surfactant and sonication. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 1449-1461 (2014).
53. Corma, A., Rey, F., Valencia, S., Jorda, J. L. & Rius, J. A zeolite with interconnected 8-, 10-and 12-ring pores and its unique catalytic selectivity. Nature Mater. 2, 493-497 (2003).
54. Jiang, J., Yu, J. & Corma, A. Extra-large-pore zeolites: Bridging the gap between micro and mesoporous structures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.49, 3120-3145 (2010).
55. Jiang, J., Jorda, J. L., Diaz-Cabanas, M. J., Yu, J. & Corma, A. The synthesis of an extra-large-pore zeolite with double three-ring building units and a low framework density. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 4986-4988 (2010).
56. Brunner, G. O. & Meier, W. M. Framework density distribution of zeolite-type tetrahedral nets. Nature 337, 146-147 (1989).
57. Sun, J. et al. The ITQ-37 mesoporous chiral zeolite. Nature 458, 1154-1160 (2009).
58. Kamakoti, P. & Barckholtz, T. A. Role of germanium in the formation of double four rings in zeolites. J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 3575-3583 (2007).
59. Sastre, G., Pulido, A. & Corma, A. An attempt to predict and rationalize relative stabilities and preferential germanium location in Si/Ge zeolites. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 82, 159-163 (2005).
60. Burel, L., Kasian, N. & Tuel, A. Quasi all-silica zeolite obtained by isomorphous degermanation of an as-made germanium-containing precursor. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 1360-1363 (2014).
61. Liu, X., Kasian, N. & Tuel, A. New insights into the degermanation process of ITQ-17 zeolites. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 190, 171-180 (2014).
62. Liu, X., Ravon, U., Bosselet, F., Bergeret, G. & Tuel, A. Probing Ge distribution in zeolite frameworks by post-synthesis introduction of fluoride in as-made materials. Chem. Mater. 24, 3016-3022 (2012).
63. Liu, X., Ravon, U. & Tuel, A. Effect of HF concentration on the composition and distribution of Ge species in the framework of ITQ-13 and ITQ-17 zeolites. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 170, 194-199 (2013).
64. Verheyen, E. et al. Design of zeolite by inverse sigma transformation. Nature Mater. 11, 1059-1064 (2012).
65. Paillaud, J. L., Harbuzaru, B., Patarin, J. & Bats, N. Extra-large-pore zeolites with two-dimensional channels formed by 14 and 12 rings. Science 304, 990-992 (2004).
66. Corma, A., Diaz-Cabanas, M. J., Rey, F., Nicolooulas, S. & Boulahya, K. ITQ-15: The first ultralarge pore zeolite with a bi-directional pore system formed by intersecting 14-and 12-ring channels, and its catalytic implications. Chem. Commun., 1356-1357 (2004).
67. Roth, W. J. et al. Postsynthesis transformation of three-dimensional framework into a lamellar zeolite with modifiable architecture. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 6130-6133 (2011).
68. Roth, W. J. et al. A family of zeolites with controlled pore size prepared using a top-down method. Nature Chem. 5, 628-633 (2013).
69. Chlubna, P. et al. 3D to 2D routes to ultrathin and expanded zeolitic materials. Chem. Mater. 25, 542-547 (2013).
70. Wheatley, P. et al. Zeolites with continuously tuneable porosity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 13210-13214 (2014).
71. Chlubna-Eliasova, P. et al. The assembly-disassembly-organization-reassembly mechanism for 3D-2D-3D transformation of germanosilicate IWW zeolite. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 7048-7052 (2014).
72. Shamzy, M. et al. Germanosilicate precursors of ADORable zeolites obtained by disassembly of ITH, ITR, and IWR zeolites Chem. Mater., 26, 5789?5798 (2014).
73. Goa, Y. et al. Controlled detitanation of ETS-10 materials through the post-synthetic treatment and their applications to the liquid-phase epoxidation of alkenes Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 70, 93-101 (2004).
74. Bordiga, S. et al. Reactivity of Ti(iv) species hosted in TS-1 towards H2O2-H2O solutions investigated by ab initio cluster and periodic approaches combined with experimental XANES and EXAFS data: A review and new highlights. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 9, 4854-4878 (2007).
75. Freyhardt, C. C. et al. VPI-8: A high-silica molecular sieve with a novel 'pinwheel' building unit and its implications for the synthesis of extra-large pore molecular sieves J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 7299-7310 (1996).
76. Trachta, M., Bludský, O., Cejka, J., Morris, R. E. & Nachtigall, P. From double-four-ring germanosilicates to new zeolites: In silico investigation. ChemPhysChem. 15, 2972-2976 (2014).
77. Trachta, M., Bludský, O. & Nachtigall, P. The ADOR synthesis of new zeolites: In silico investigation. Catal. Today 243, 32-38 (2015).
78. Carter, V. J. et al. AlMePO-beta: inclusion and thermal removal of structure directing agent and the topotactic reconstructive transformation to its polymorph AlMePO-alpha. J. Mater. Chem 7, 2287-2292 (1997).
79. Wragg, D. S., Hix, G. B. & Morris, R. E. Azamacrocycle-containing gallium phosphates: A new class of inorganic-organic hybrid material J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 6822-6823 (1998).