Powerful practices in digital learning processes

Electronic Journal of e-Learning

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 291-301

  Sørensen, Birgitte Holm ^a   Levinsen, Karin Tweddell ^a  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Agency; Assessment; Construction of meaning; Digital learning processes; Empowerment; Evaluation; Evaluation design; Formative; Multimodality; Peer evaluation; Reflection; Self evaluation; Summative; Teacher evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928680234     PISSN: 14794403     EISSN: 14794403     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Black, P. (2013) Valuing Assessment in Science Education: Pedagogy, Curriculum, Policy. In Corrigan, Gunstone and Jones (Eds.), Pedagogy in Theory and in Practice: Formative and Summative Assessments in Classrooms and in Systems, pp 207-229, Springer, Dordrecht, New York.
2. Black, P. J. and Wiliam, D. (1998) “Assessment and Classroom Learning”, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp 7-73.
3. Black, P. J. and Wiliam, D. (2009) “Developing the Theory of Formative Assessment”, Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp 5-31.
4. Bloom, B. S., Hastings, T. and Madaus, G. (1971) Handbook of Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning, McGraw-Hill, New York.
5. Brookhart, S. M. (2001) “Successful Students’ Formative and Summative Uses of Assessment Information”, Assessment in Education, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp 153-169.
6. Dale, E. L. (1989) Pedagogisk Profesjionalitet, Gyldendal, Oslo.
7. Dale, E. L. (2000) Professionalisering og Læring i Organisationer. Andersen and Frederiksen (Eds.), Innovation, Kompetence, Læring, pp 123-130, Dafolo, Frederiksberg.
8. deSouzae Silva, A. (2006) “From Cyber to Hybrid”, Space and Culture, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp 261-278.
9. Dysthe, O. (2009) “Evaluering i Klassen til Støtte for Læring”, KvaN, Vol. 85, pp 43-59.
10. Dysthe, O., Hertzberg, F. and Hoel T. L. (2001) Skrive for at Lære-Faglig Skrivning i de Videregående Uddannelser, Klim, Århus.
11. Harlen, W. and Deakin Crick, R. (2002) “A Systematic Review of the Impact of Summative Assessment and Tests on Students’ Motivation for Learning”, Research Evidence in Education Library, Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre), Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, London.
12. Hattie, J. and Timperley, H. (2007) “The Power of Feedback”, Review of Educational Research, Vol. 77, pp 81-112.
13. Levinsen, K. and Sørensen, B. H. (2013) “Students as Learning Designers”, Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2013, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, 2013, pp 5142-5149, Chesapeake, VA.
14. Levinsen, K., Sørensen, B. H., Tosca, S., Ejsing-Duun, S. and Karoff, H. S. (2014) “Research and Development Projects with ICT and students as learning designers in Primary Schools: a methodological challenge”, Proceedings of the 4th. International Conference on Design for Learning: Expanding the field. Stockholm 2014.
15. Littleton, K., Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., Rowe, D. and Sams, C. (2005) “Thinking Together at Key Stage 1”, Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp 165-180.
16. Luckin, R., Bligh, B., Manches, A., Ainsworth, S., Crook, C. and Noss, R. (2012) Decoding Learning: The Proof, Promise and Potential of Digital Education, Nesta, London.
17. Matyi, R. (2010) “University Senate Council on Academic Assessment Orientation Packet 2010-11 Rich Matyi, Chair”, http://www.albany.edu/assessment/CAA_Orientation_Packet_2010_2011_Part1.pdf (Accessed february 2015).
18. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2008) “21st. Century Skills: How can you Prepare Students for the new Global Economy?”, [online], Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, http://www.oecd.org/site/educeri21st/40756908.pdf (Accessed June 2014).
19. Scriven, M. (1967) The Methodology of Evaluation. In Stake, R. E. (Ed.), Curriculum Evaluation. American Educational Research Association (monograph series on evaluation, no. 1), Rand McNally, Chicago.
20. Shewbridge, C., Jang, E., Matthews, P. and Santiago, P. (2011) “OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education-DENMARK”, [online], Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/47696663.pdf (Accessed June 2014).
21. Sørensen, B., Audon, L. and Levinsen, K. (2010) Skole 2.0, Klim, Aarhus.
22. Sørensen, B. H.; Levinsen, K.. (2014) “Digital Production and Students as Learning Designers”. Designs for Learning, Vol. 7, No. 1 p. 54-73
23. Sørensen, B. H. and Levinsen, K. (2014) Didaktisk Design-Digital Produktion, Akademisk Forlag, København.
24. Tanner, H. and Jones, S. (2003) “Self-efficacy in Mathematics and Students’ Use of Self-regulated Learning Strategies during Assessment Events”, Proceedings of the 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME) held jointly with the 25th Conference of PME-NA, Vol. 4, pp 275-283.
25. Taras, M. (2008) “Summative and Formative Assessment-Perceptions and Realities”, Active Learning in Higher Education, Vol. 9, No. 2, July, pp 172-192.
26. Undervisningsministeriet (2009) Fælles Mål 2009-Dansk, forløb-1.-2. klassetrin, http://www.uvm.dk/Service/Publikationer/Publikationer/Folkeskolen/2009/Faelles-Maal-2009-Dansk/Laeseplan-for-faget-dansk/1-forloeb-1-2-klassetrin (accessed february 2015)
27. Wyatt-Smith, C. and Kimber, K. (2009) “Working Multimodally: Challenges for Assessment”, English Teaching: Practice and Critique, Vol. 8, No. 3, December, pp 70-90.