Meat quality and the histological structure of breast and leg muscles in Ayam Cemani chickens, Ayam Cemani×Sussex hybrids and slow-growing Hubbard JA 957 chickens

Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Volumn 95, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 1730-1735

  Łukasiewicz, Monika ^a   Niemiec, Jan ^a   Wnuk, Agnieszka ^a   Mroczek Sosnowska, Natalia ^a  

^a WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Poland)

Author keywords

Chickens; Histological structure of muscles; Meat quality

Indexed keywords

GALLUS GALLUS;

PROTEIN INTAKE;

ANALYSIS; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; BREEDING; CHICKEN; CROSS BREEDING; FOOD QUALITY; GENETICS; LIMB; MEAT; PECTORALIS MAJOR MUSCLE; PROTEIN INTAKE; SKELETAL MUSCLE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; CHICKENS; CROSSES, GENETIC; DIETARY PROTEINS; EXTREMITIES; FOOD QUALITY; MEAT; MUSCLE FIBERS, SKELETAL; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PECTORALIS MUSCLES; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84928570500     PISSN: 00225142     EISSN: 10970010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.6883     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Papadima SN, Arvanitoyannis I, Bloukas JG and Fournitzis GC, Chemometric model for describing Greek traditional sausages. Meat Sci 51:271-277 (1999).
2. Probola G and Zander L, Application of PCA method for characterization of textural properties of selected ready-to-eat meat products. J Food Eng 83:93-98 (2007).
3. Crouse JD, Koohmaraie M and Seideman SD, The relationship of muscle fibre size to tenderness of beef. Meat Sci 30:295-302 (1991).
4. Suderman DR, Selecting flavoring and seasoning for batter and breading systems. Cereal World 38:689-694 (1993).
5. Lawrie RA, Lawrie's Meat Science (6th edn). Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp. 219-230 (1998).
6. Muryanto M. Malajah Poultry Indonesia No. 132/XII, pp. 16-20 (1991).
7. Iskandar S and Seapudin Y, Germplasm, Cemani chicken (qualitative characteristics, quantitative characteristics, breeding procedure, preservation and research efforts). [Online]. (2005). Available: www.balitnak.litbang.deptan.go.id [17 April 2007].
8. Ostaszewska T, Dąbrowski K, Wegner A and Krawiec M, The effects of feeding on muscle growth dynamics and the proliferation of myogenic progenitor cells during pike perch development (Sander lucioperca). J World Aquacult Soc 39:184-195 (2008).
9. PKN, Mięso I Przetwory Mięsne - Pomiar pH - Metoda Odwoławcza. PN-ISO 2917/PN 76R64752 (2001).
10. Wierbicki E, Tiede MG and Burrell RC, Die Bestimmung der Fleischquellung als Methode zur Untersuchung der Wasserbindungkapazität von Muskelproteinen mit geringen Salthaltevermögen. Fleischwirtschaft 10:948-951 (1962).
11. AOAC, Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Arlington, VA (1995).
12. Smolińska T, Korzeniowska M and Zechałko-Czajkowska A, Processing of Poultry Meat - Biological and Technological Base. Wroclaw, Poland (2009).
13. Grabowski T, Technologia Mięsa Drobiowego. WNT, Warsaw (1993).
14. Łukasiewicz M, Michalczuk M, Pietrzak D and Adamczak L, Chemical composition and physico-chemical properties of meat of Ayam Cemani hens and cocks. Anim Sci 46:307-313 (2009).
15. Gornowicz E, Pawlak A and Dziadek K, Indicators of the quality of meat and density of broiler chickens. Hodowca Drobiu 4:44-47 (2004).
16. Jankiewicz M, Effect of the feed additive selected replacement of antibiotic growth promoters on the quality of meat and fat of chickens. Master's Thesis, ZTM, SGGW, Warsaw (2007).
17. Rosińska A, Influence of selected additives and slaughter age on the quality of the meat and fat of chickens. Master's Thesis, ZTM, SGGW, Warsaw (2009).
18. Łapa P, Maj D and Bieniek J, The color and texture of the meat of rabbit breeds and their hybrids. Med Wet 64:454-456 (2008).
19. Strzyzewski T, Bilska A and Krysztofiak K, The relationship between the pH of the meat and its color. Nauka Przyr Technol 2:1-9 (2008).
20. Kirkpinar F, Bozkurt M and Erker R, The effects of dietary dried alfalfa meal on skin pigmentation and performance of broiler. Proc. XV Eur. Symp. on Quality of Poultry Meat, 9-12 September, Turkey, pp. 199-204 (2001).
21. Młynek K, Elminowska-Wenda G and Guliński P, The relationship between microstructure of longissimus lumborum muscle and carcass quality of bulls slaughtered at three ages. Anim Sci Pap Rep 24:57-63 (2006).
22. Vestergaard M, Oksbierg N and Henckel P, Influence of feeding intensity, grazing and finishing feeding on meat and eating quality of young bulls and the relationship between muscle fibre characteristics, fibre fragmentation and meat tenderness. Meat Sci 54:187-195 (2000).
23. Wegner J, Albrecht E, Fiedler I, Teuscher F, Papstien HJ and Enderr K, Growth- and breed-related changes of muscle fibre characteristics in cattle. J Anim Sci 78:1485-1496 (2008).
24. Berri C, Variability of sensory and processing qualities of poultry meat. World Poult Sci J 56:209-224 (2000).
25. Iwamoto H, Gotoh T, Tabata S, Nishimura S and Okamoto S, Changes of histochemical profile of myofibers in pectoralis and supracoracoideus fasciculi induced by breeding for large or small body size in Japanese quails. Anim Sci J 74:111-118 (2003).
26. Prentis PF, Penney RK and Goldspink G, Possible use of an indicator muscle in future breeding experiments in domestic fowl. Br Poult Sci 25:33-41 (1984).
27. Brocka L, Hulsedgge B and Merkus G, Histochemical characteristic in relation to meat quality properties in the longissimus lumborum of fast and lean growing lines of Large White pigs. Meat Sci 50:441-420 (1998).
28. Guernec A, Berri C, Chevalier B, Wacrenier-Céré N, Le Bihan-Duval E and Duclos MJ, Muscle development, insulin-like growth factor-I and myostatin mRNA levels in chickens selected for increased breast muscle yield. Growth Horm IGF Res 13:8-18. (2003).
29. Bogucka J and Kapelański W, Histopathological changes in longissimus lumborum muscle of Polish Landrace and crossbred Stamboek and Torhyb pigs. Anim Sci Pap Rep 22(Suppl. 3):67-72 (2004).
30. Dransfield E and Sośnicki AA, Relationship between muscle growth and poultry meat quality. Poult Sci 78:743-746 (1999).
31. Bottinelli R and Reggiani C, Human skeletal muscle fibres: molecular and functional diversity. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 73:195-262 (2000).
32. Ozawa S, Mitsuhashi T, Mitsumoto M, Matsumoto S, Itoh N, Itagaki K, et al., The characteristics of muscle fiber types of longissimus thoracis muscle and their influences on the quantity and quality of meat from Japanese Black steers. Meat Sci 54:65-70 (2000).
33. Candek-Potokar M, Zlender B, Lefaucheur L and Bonneau M, Effects of age and/or weight at slaughter on longissimus dorsi muscle: biochemical traits and sensory quality in pigs. Meat Sci 48:287-300 (1998).
34. Ryu YC, Choi YM, Lee SH, Shin HG, Choe JH, Kim JM, et al., Comparing the histochemical characteristics and meat quality traits of different pig breeds. Meat Sci 80:363-369 (2008).
35. Jurie C, Picard B and Geay Y, Changes in the metabolic and contractile characteristics of muscle in male cattle between 10 and 16 months of age. Histochem J 31:117-122 (1999).
36. Branciari R, Mugnai C, Mammoli R, Miraglia D, Ranucci D, Dal Bosco A, et al., Effect of genotype and rearing system on chicken behavior and muscle fiber characteristics. J Anim Sci 87:4109-4117 (2009).
37. Castellini C, Mugnai C and Dal Bosco A, Effect of conventional versus organic method of production on the broiler carcass and meat quality. Meat Sci 60:219-225 (2002).
38. Castellini C, Mugnai C and Dal Bosco A, Meat quality of three chicken genotypes reared according to the organic system. Ital J Food Sci 14:403-414 (2002b).
39. Karlsson AH, Klont RE and Fernandez X, Skeletal muscle fibres as factor for pork quality. Livest Prod Sci 60:255-269 (1999).
40. Petersen JS, Henckel P, Oksbjerg N and Sorensen MT, Adaptations in muscle fibre characteristics induced by physical activity in pigs. J Anim Sci 66:733-740 (1998).
41. Sobolewska A, Elminowska-Wenda G, Walasik K, Bogucka J, Sławińska A, Szczerba A, et al., Increase in thickness of the pectoral muscle fibers in meat-type chicken between 1st and 35th day of fattening. XXIII Int. Poultry Symp., pp. 40-41 (2011).
42. Bereta A and Eckert R, Histological profile of muscles is strictly related to pork quality. Wiad Zootech 4:65-70 (2010).
43. Choi YM and Kim BC, Muscle fiber characteristics, myofibrillar protein isoforms, and meat quality. Livest Sci 122:105-118 (2009).
44. Cameron ND, Oksbjerg N, Henckel P, Nute G, Brown S and Wood JD, Relationships between muscle fibre traits with meat and eating quality in pigs. BSAS Annu. Meet., p. 123 (1998).
45. Migdał W, Wojtysiak D and Paściak P, Profile histochemical muscle pigs depending on the type of muscle, sex, race, body weight and nutrition. Z˙ywność Nauka Technologia Jakość 3(44):157-168 (2005).
46. Jarmuz˙ W, Histological evaluation of muscle fibers dorsi muscle bulls breed NBC. Rocz Nauk Rol B 107:201-207 (1999).
47. Scheuermann GN, Bilgili SF, Tuzun S and Mulvaney DR, Comparison of chicken genotypes: myofibre number in pectoralis muscle and myostatin ontogeny. Poult Sci 83:1404-1412 (2004).
48. Burke WH and Henry MH, Characteristics of the pectoralis superficialis and semimembranosus of broiler strain chickens, bantam chickens, and the reciprocal crosses. Poult Sci 76:767-773 (1997).
49. Remignon H, Lefaucheur L, Blum JC and Ricard FH, Effects of divergent selection for body weight on three skeletal muscles characteristics in the chicken. Br Poult Sci 35:65-76 (1994).
50. Remignon H, Cardahaut MF, Marche G and Ricard FH, Selection for rapid growth increases the number and the size of muscle fibers without changing their typing in chickens. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 16:95-102 (1995).
51. Fiłonik A and Niemiec J, Effect of growth promoters used in the production results, levels of lipids and physicochemical properties of meat. Rocz Nauk Zoot 16:305-310 (2002).
52. Fletcher DL, Poultry meat quality. World Poult Sci J 58:131-145 (2002).