Multiparametric 3-T MRI for differentiating low-versus high-grade and category T1 versus T2 bladder urothelial carcinoma

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 204, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 330-334

  Wang, Huan Jun ^a   Pui, Margaret H ^b   Guo, Yan ^a   Li, Shu Rong ^a   Guan, Jian ^a   Zhang, Xiao Ling ^a   Cai, Hua Song ^a  

^a THE FIRST AFFILIATED HOSPITAL OF SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Macau Special Administrative Region   (Macao)

Author keywords

Apparent diffusion coefficient; Bladder carcinoma; Diffusion weighted MRI

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BLADDER CARCINOMA; CANCER GRADING; CANCER PROGNOSIS; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTECTOMY; DETRUSOR MUSCLE; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARAMETRIC TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TRANSITIONAL CELL CARCINOMA; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; BLADDER TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

ADULT; AGED; CARCINOMA, TRANSITIONAL CELL; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM GRADING; NEOPLASM STAGING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84928565895     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.13147     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. TNM system of ihe International Union Againsl Cancer. In: Sobin LH. Wiliekincl CM. eils. Inter-natlonal Union Against Cancer (UICC): TNM classification of malignant tumours, 5th eil. New York, NY: Wiley-Liss, 1997:170-173
2. Waianahe H. Kanematsu M, Kondo II, et al. Preoperative T staging of urinary bladder cancer: does diffusion-weighted MRI have supplementary value.' AJR 2009; 192:1361-1366
3. El-Assmy A. Aboui-El-Ghar ME, Mosbah A. et al. Bladder tumour staging: comparison of diffusion-and T2-weighted MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2009; 19:1575-15X1
4. Wu LM. Chen XX. Xu JR, et al. Clinical value of T2-weighled imaging combined with diffusion-weighted imaging in preoperative T staging of urinary bladder cancer: a large-scale, multiob-server prospective study on 3.0-T MRI. Acad Radiol 2013;20:939-946
5. Kobayashi S. Koga F, Yoshida S, et al. Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in bladder cancer: potential utility of apparent diffusion coefficient values as a biomarker to predict clinical aggressiveness. Eur Radiol 2011;21:2178-2186
6. Avcu S. Koseoglu MN. Ceylan K, et al. The value of diffusion-weighted MRI in the diagnosis of malignant and benign urinary bladder lesions, lir J Radiol 20II;84:875-XX2
7. Takeuchi M, Sasaki S, llo M, et al. Urinary bladder cancer: diffusion-weighted MR imaging-accuracy for diagnosing T stage and estimating his-lologie grade. Radiology 2009; 251:112-121
8. Kobayashi S, Koga E, Kajino K, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient value reflects invasive and proliferative potential of bladder cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014; 39:172-178
9. Tekes A, Kamel I, Imam K, et al. Dynamic MRI of bladder cancer: evaluation of staging accuracy. /UR2005; 1X4:121-127
10. Kim B, Semelka RC, Ascher SM, et al. Bladder tumor staging: comparison of contrast-enhanced CT, Tl-and T2-weighled MR imaging, dynamic gadolinium-enhanced imaging, and late gadolinium-enhanced imaging. Radiology 1994: 193:2.39-245
11. Tanimolo A, Yuasa Y, Imai Y, et al. Bladder lu-mor staging: comparison of conventional and gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR imaging and CT. Radiology 1992; 1X5:741-747
12. Hayashi N. Tochigi H, Shiraishi T, et al. A new staging criterion for bladder carcinoma using gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with an endorectal surface coil: a comparison with ultrasonography. IIJU hit 2000; 85:32-36
13. Narumi y, Kadola T, Inoue E. et al. Bladder tumors: staging with gadolinium-enhanced oblique MR imaging. Radiology 1993; 187:145-150
14. Caruso (i. Salvaggio G, Campisi A, et al. Bladder tumor staging: comparison of contrast-enhanced and gray-scale ultrasound. AJR 2010; 194:151-156
15. Qu X, Huang X. Wu L, et al. Comparison of virtual cystoscopy and ultrasonography for bladder cancer detection: a meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2011;80:188-197
16. I.iedberg F, Bendahl PO, Davidsson T, et al. Preoperative staging of locally advanced bladder cancer before radical cystectomy using 3 tesla mag-nelic resonance imaging wilh a standardized protocol. ScandJ Urol 2013; 47:108-112
17. Rajesh A, Sokhi HK, Fung R, et al. Bladder cancer: evaluation of staging accuracy using dynamic MRI. Clin Radiol 2011; 66:1140-1145
18. Roscnkrantz AB, Haghighi M. Horn J. et al. Utility of quantitative MRI metrics for assessment of stage and grade of urothelial carcinoma of Ihe bladder: preliminary results. AJR 201.3; 201:1254-1259
19. Wang iij. Pui Mll.Guo y, et al. Value of normalized apparent diffusion coefficient for estimating histologic grade of vesical urothelial carcinoma. Clin Radiol 2014; 69:727-731
20. Bammer R. Basic principles of diffusion-weighted imaging. Eur J Radiol 2003; 45:169-184
21. Taouli B, Koh DM. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of ihe liver. Radiology 2010; 254:47-66