A new staging criterion for bladder carcinoma using gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with an endorectal surface coil: A comparison with ultrasonography

BJU International

Volumn 85, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 32-36

  Hayashi, N ^a   Tochigi, H ^b   Shiraishi, T ^a   Takeda, K ^a   Kawamura, J ^a  

^a MIE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b Mie Prefectural General Medical Center   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bladder tumour; Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging; Staging accuracy; Submucosal linear enhancement; Transurethral ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLADDER CARCINOMA; CANCER INVASION; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUSCLE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM; SUBMUCOSA; SUPERFICIAL CANCER; VASCULARIZATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS;

EID: 0033979578     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2000.00358.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. 1 Amendola MA, Glazer GM, Grossman HB, Aisen AM, Francis IR. Staging of bladder carcinoma: MRI-CT-surgical correlation. Am J Roentgen 1986; 146: 1179-83
2. 2 Bryan PJ, Butler HE, LiPuma JP, Resnick MI, Kursh ED. CT and MR imaging in staging bladder neoplasms. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987; 11: 96-101
3. 3 Kim B, Semelka RC, Ascher SM, Chalpin DB, Carroll PR, Hricak H. Bladder tumor staging: comparison of contrast-enhanced CT, T1-and T2-weighted MR imaging, dynamic gadolinium-enhanced imaging, and late gadolinium-enhanced imaging. Radiology 1994; 193: 239-45
4. 4 Salo JO, Kivisaari L, Lehtonen T. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with computed tomography and intravesical ultrasound in staging bladder cancer. Urol Radiol 1988; 10: 167-72
5. 5 Husband JES, Olliff JFC, Williams MP, Heron CW, Cherryman GR. Bladder cancer: staging with CT and MR imaging. Radiology 1989; 173: 435-40
6. 6 Neuerburg JM, Bohndorf K, Sohn M, Teufl F, Guenther RW, Daus HJ. Urinary bladder neoplasms: evaluation with contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1989; 172: 739-43
7. 7 Doringer E, Joos H, Forstner R, Schmoller H. Magnetic resonance imaging of urinary bladder carcinoma: tumor staging and gadolinium contrast-enhanced imaging. Eur Radiol 1992; 2: 124-9
8. 8 Narumi Y, Kadota T, Inoue E et al. Bladder tumors: staging with gadolinium-enhanced oblique MR imaging. Radiology 1993; 187: 145-50
9. 9 Schnall MD, Lenkinski RE, Pollack HW, Imai Y, Kressel HY. Prostate: MR imaging with an endorectal surface coil. Radiology 1989; 172: 570-4
10. 10 Tempany CM, Zhou X, Zerhouni EA et al. Staging of prostate cancer: Results of radiology diagnostic oncology group project comparison of three MR imaging techniques. Radiology 1994; 192: 47-54
11. 11 Takeda K, Kawaguchi T, Shiraishi T et al. Normal bladder wall morphology in Gd-DTPA-enhanced clinical MR imaging using an endorectal surface coil and histological assessment of submucosal linear enhancement using [14C] Gd-DOTA autoradiography in an animal model. Eur J Radiol 1998; 26: 290-6
12. 12 Nishimura K, Hida S, Nishio Y et al. The validity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the staging of bladder cancer: comparison with computed tomography (CT) and transurethral ultrasonography (US). Jpn J Clin Oncol 1988; 18: 217-26
13. 13 Vock P, Haertel M, Fuchs WA, Karper P, Bishop KC, Zingg EJ. Computed tomography in staging of carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Br J Urol 1982; 54: 158-63
14. 14 Tanimoto A, Yuasa Y, Imai Y et al. Bladder tumor staging: comparison of conventional and gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR imaging and CT. Radiology 1992; 185: 741-7
15. 15 Resnick MI. Ultrasound evaluation of the prostate and bladder. Sem Ultrasound 1980; 1: 69-79
16. 16 Fisher MR, Hricak H, Tanagho EA. Urinary bladder MR imaging. Part II. Neoplasms. Radiology 1985; 157: 471-7
17. 17 Pavone C, Di Trapani D, Serretta V et al. Transurethral ultrasonography, CT scan, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging and pathological control in staging and follow up of invasive bladder carcinoma. Prog Clin Biol Res 1988; 260: 251-63
18. 18 Tachibana M, Baba S, Deguchi N et al. Efficacy of gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for differentiation between superficial and muscle-invasive tumor of the bladder: a comparative study with computerized tomography and transurethral ultrasonography. J Urol 1991; 145: 1169-73
19. 19 Scattoni V, Da Pozzo LF, Colombo R et al. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in staging of superficial bladder cancer. J Urol 1996; 155: 1594-9
20. 20 Husband JE, Padhani AR, Macvicar AD, Revell P. Magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer: Comparison of image quality using endorectal and pelvic phased array coils. Clin Radiol 1998; 53: 673-81