Hydroxyapatite bone substitutes developed via replication of natural marine sponges

Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 2255-2261

  Cunningham, Eoin ^a   Dunne, Nicholas ^a   Walker, Gavin ^a   Maggs, Christine ^a   Wilcox, Ruth ^b   Buchanan, Fraser ^a  

^a QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CERAMIC MATERIALS; HYDROXYAPATITE; MARINE ENGINEERING; PORE SIZE; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); TISSUE;

BONE SUBSTITUTES; CANCELLOUS BONE; HIGH SOLID CONTENT; INTERCONNECTIVITY; ITS ARCHITECTURE; PORE ARCHITECTURE; SCAFFOLD STRUCTURES; TISSUE-ENGINEERED BONES;

BONE;

ELLIPTIO CRASSIDENS; SPONGIA; SPONGIA AGARICINA; SPONGIA OFFICINALIS;

EID: 84928537972     PISSN: 09574530     EISSN: 15734838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10856-009-3961-4     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Jones JR, et al. Non-destructive quantitative 3D analysis for the optimisation of tissue scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2007; 28(7): 1404-13.
2. Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials. 2005; 26(27): 5474-91.
3. Sopyan I, et al. Porous hydroxyapatite for artificial bone applications. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2007; 8(1-2): 116-23.
4. von Doernberg M-C, et al. In vivo behavior of calcium phosphate scaffolds with four different pore sizes. Biomaterials. 2006; 27(30): 5186-98.
5. Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulos H, Tsiridis E. Bone substitutes: an update. Injury. 2005; 36(3, Supplement 1): 20-7.
6. Engin NO, Tas AC. Manufacture of macroporous calcium hydroxyapatite bioceramics. J Eur Ceram Soc. 1999; 19: 2569-72.
7. Klawitter JJ, Hulbert SF. Application of porous ceramics for the attachment of load bearing internal orthopaedic applications. J Biomed Mater Res Symp. 1971; 2(1): 161-229.
8. Bohner M, Baumgart F. Theoretical model to determine the effects of geometrical factors on the resorption of calcium phosphate bone substitutes. Biomaterials. 2004; 25(17): 3569-82.
9. Bignon A, et al. Effect of micro-and macroporosity of bone substitutes on their mechanical properties and cellular response. Mater Med. 2003; 14: 1089-97.
10. Cyster LA, et al. The influence of dispersant concentration on the pore morphology of hydroxyapatite ceramics for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2005; 26(7): 697-702.
11. Mastrogiacomo M, et al. Role of scaffold internal structure on in vivo bone formation in macroporous calcium phosphate bioceramics. Biomaterials. 2006; 27(17): 3230-7.
12. Woodard JR, et al. The mechanical properties and osteoconductivity of hydroxyapatite bone scaffolds with multi-scale porosity. Biomaterials. 2007; 28(1): 45-54.
13. Woesz A, et al. Towards bone replacement materials from calcium phosphates via rapid prototyping and ceramic gelcasting. Mater Sci Eng C. 2005; 25(2): 181-6.
14. Yang SF. The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part 1. Traditional factors. Tissue Eng. 2001; 7(6): 679-89.
15. Alisky JM. Xenografts are an achievable breakthrough. Med Hypotheses. 2004; 63(1): 92-7.
16. Tancred DC, McCormack BAO, Carr AJ. A synthetic bone implant macroscopically identical to cancellous bone. Biomaterials. 1998; 19(24): 2303-11.
17. Vaccaro A. The role of the osteoconductive scaffold in synthetic bone graft. Orthopaeadics. 2002; 25(5): s571-8.
18. Hing KA, Wilson LF, Buckland T. Comparative performance of three ceramic bone graft substitutes. Spine J. 2007; 7(4): 475-90.
19. Blom A. (V) Which scaffold for which application? Curr Orthop. 2007; 21(4): 280-7.
20. Muhamad Nor MAA et al. Preparation and characterization of ceramic foam produced via polymeric foam replication method. J Mater Process Technol. 2008; (in press, corrected proof).
21. Chen QZ, Thompson ID, Boccaccini AR. 45S5 Bioglass derived glass ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2006; 27: 2414-25.
22. Saiz E, et al. Preparation of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C. 2007; 27(3): 546-50.
23. Ramay HR, Zhang M. Preparation of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds by combination of the gel-casting and polymer sponge methods. Biomaterials. 2003; 24(19): 3293-302.
24. Kim H-W, Knowles JC, Kim H-E. Hydroxyapatite porous scaffold engineered with biological polymer hybrid coating for antibiotic vancomycin release. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2005; 16(3): 189-95.
25. Callcut S, Knowles JC. Correlation between structure and compressive strength in a reticulated glass-reinforced hydroxyapatite foam. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2002; 13(5): 485-9.
26. Kim H-W, Knowles JC, Kim H-E. Hydroxyapatite/poly([var epsilon]-caprolactone) composite coatings on hydroxyapatite porous bone scaffold for drug delivery. Biomaterials. 2004; 25 (7-8): 1279-87.
27. Zhang F, et al. Bioinspired structure of bioceramics for bone regeneration in load-bearing sites. Acta Biomater. 2007; 3(6): 896-904.
28. Müller WEG, et al. Traditional and modern biomedical prospecting: Part I-the history sustainable exploitation of biodiversity (sponges and invertebrates) in the Adriatic Sea in Rovinj (Croatia). Evid Based Complement Alternat Med (eCAM). 2004; 1(1): 71-82.
29. Rambo CR, et al. Biomimetic apatite coating on biomorphous alumina scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C. 2006; 26(1): 92-9.
30. Cunningham E, et al. High-solid-content hydroxyapatite slurry for the production of bone substitute scaffolds. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 2009; 223(6): 727-37.
31. Abell AB, Willis KL, Lange DA. Mercury intrusion porosimetry and image analysis of cement-based materials. J Colloid Interf Sci. 1999; 211: 39-44.
32. Moro F, Bohni H. Ink-bottle effect in mercury intrusion porosimetry of cement-based materials. J Colloid Interf Sci. 2001; 246: 135-49.
33. Pronzato R, Manconi R. Mediterranean commercial sponges: over 5000 years of natural history and cultural heritage. Mar Ecol. 2008; 29: 144-66.
34. Chang B-S, et al. Osteoconduction at porous hydroxyapatite with various pore configurations. Biomaterials. 2000; 21(12): 1291-8.
35. Gauthier O, et al. Macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics: influence of macropore diameter and macroporosity percentage on bone ingrowth. Biomaterials. 1998; 19(1-3): 133-9.
36. Le Huec JC, et al. Influence of porosity on the mechanical resistance of hydroxyapatite ceramics under compressive stress. Biomaterials. 1995; 16(2): 113-8.