Numerical regularization: The numerical analysis of implicit subgrid models

Implicit Large Eddy Simulation: Computing Turbulent Fluid Dynamics

Volumn 9780521869829, Issue , 2007, Pages 195-221

  Margolin, Len G ^a,b   Rider, William J ^c,d  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b Applied Physics Division   (United States)

^c SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

^d Computational Physics Research and Development Department ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; LARGE EDDY SIMULATION; NUMERICAL MODELS;

APPROPRIATE MODELS; FINITE-VOLUME; FINITE-VOLUME METHOD; IMPLICIT LARGE EDDY SIMULATIONS; MODIFIED EQUATION ANALYSIS; NONOSCILLATORY; REGULARISATION; SPACE AND TIME; SUBGRID MODELING; VOLUME EQUATIONS;

MACHINERY;

EID: 84928422915     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/9780511618604.011     Document Type: Chapter

References (19)

1. Drikakis, D., & Rider, W. 2004 High-Resolution Methods for Incompressible and Low-Speed Flows. New York: Springer-Verlag.
2. Frisch, U. 1995 Turbulence: The Legacy of A. N. Kolmogorov. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Fureby, C., & Grinstein, F. F. 2002 Large eddy simulation of high reynolds number free and wall bounded flows. J. Comp. Phys. 181, pp. 68-97.
4. Garnier, E., Mossi, M., Sagaut, P., Comte, P., & Deville, M. 1999 On the use of shock-capturing scheme for large-eddy simulation. J. Comput. Phys. 153, 273.
5. Grinstein, F. F., & Fureby, C. 2002 Recent progress on MILES for high Re flows. J. Fluids Eng. 124, 848.
6. Hirsch, C. 1999 Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows. New York: Wiley.
7. Hirt, C. W. 1968 Heuristic stability theory for finite difference equations. J. Comput. Phys. 2, 339-355.
8. Hughes, T. J. R., Mazzei, L., Oberai, A. A., & Wray, A. 2001. The multiscale formulation of large eddy simulation: Decay of homogeneous isotropic turbulence. Phys. Fluids 13, 505-512.
9. Huynh, H. T. 1995 Accurate upwind methods for the Euler equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 32, 1565-1619.
10. Kang, H.S., Chester, S., & Meneveau, C. 2003 Decaying turbulence in an active-grid-generated flow and comparisons with large-eddy simulation. J. Fluid Mech. 480, 129-160.
11. Knoll, D., Mousseau, V., Margolin, L., & Chacon, L. 2003 On balanced approximations for time integration of multiple time scale systems. J. Comput. Phys. 185, 583-611.
12. Margolin, L. G., & Rider, W. J. 2002 A rationale for implicit turbulence modeling. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 39, 821-841.
13. Margolin, L. G., & Rider, W. J. 2005 The design and construction of implicit subgrid scale models. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 47, 1173-1179.
14. Meneveau, C., & Katz, J. 2000 Scale-invariance and turblence models for large-eddy simulation. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 1-32.
15. Rider, W., & Margolin, L. 2003 From numerical analysis to implicit subgrid turbulence modeling. Paper AIAA-2003-4101.
16. Rider, W. J., Greenough, J., & Kamm, J. R. 2005 Combining high-order accuracy with non-oscillatory methods through monotonicity preservation. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 47, 1253-1259.
17. Rider, W. J., Greenough, J. & Kamm, J. R. 2006 Extrema, accuracy and monotonicity preserving methods through adaptive nonlinear hybridizations. J. Comp. Phy., revised.
18. Sagaut, P. 2005 Large eddy simulation for Incompressible Flows, 3rd Edition. New York: Springer-Verlag.
19. Smagorinsky, J. 1963 General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. I. The basic experiment. Mon. Weather Rev. 101, 99-164.