Combining high-order accuracy with non-oscillatory methods through monotonicity preservation

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 47, Issue 10-11, 2005, Pages 1253-1259

  Rider, W J ^a   Greenough, J A ^b   Kamm, J R ^a  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

High order; Monotonicity; Non oscillatory; Preserving

Indexed keywords

FLUID DYNAMICS;

HIGH-RESOLUTION METHODS; MONOTONICITY CONDITIONS; NON-OSCILLATORY METHODS; STENCIL SELECTION;

OSCILLATIONS;

MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; OSCILLATION;

EID: 16244378250     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.875     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method. Journal of Computational Physics 1979; 32:101-136. (Reprinted in 1997; 135 (2):229-248).
2. Colella P, Woodward PR. The piecewise parabolic method (PPM) for gas-dynamical simulations. Journal of Computational Physics 1984; 54:174-201.
3. Harten A, Engquist B, Osher S, Chakravarthy S. Uniformly high order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes, III. Journal of Computational Physics 1987; 71:231-301.
4. Harten A, Osher S. Uniformly high-order accurate nonoscillatory schemes. I. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 1987; 24:1565-1619.
5. Jiang G-S, Shu C-W. Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 1996; 126:202-228.
6. Huynh HT. Accurate upwind methods for the Euler equations. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 1995; 32:279-309.
7. Suresh A, Huynh HT. Accurate monotonicity-preserving schemes with Runge-Kutta time stepping. Journal of Computational Physics 1997; 136:83-99.
8. Boris JP. A fluid transport algorithm that works. Computing as a Language for Physics. International Atomic Energy Commission: Trieste, 1971; 171-189.
9. Van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative differencing scheme I: The quest of monotonicity. Lecture Notes in Physics 1973; 163-168.
10. Tam CKW, Webb JC. Dispersion-relation-preserving schemes for computational acoustics. Journal of Computational Physics 1993; 107:262-281.
11. Rider WJ. An adaptive Riemann solver using a two-shock approximation. Computers and Fluids 1999; 28:741-777.
12. Greenough JA, Rider WJ. A quantitative comparison of numerical methods for the compressible Euler equations. Journal of Computational Physics 2004; 196(1):281-296.
13. Rider WJ, Greenough JA, Kamm JR. Extrema, accuracy and monotonicity preserving methods through adaptive nonlinear hybridizations. Journal of Computational Physics 2004, submitted. Also Los Alamos Report LA-UR-04-0593.
14. Majda A, Osher S. Propagation of error into regions of smoothness for accurate difference approximations to hyperbolic equations. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 1977; 30:671-705.