Teacherbot: interventions in automated teaching

Teaching in Higher Education

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 455-467

  Bayne, Sian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

automation; digital; MOOC; posthumanism; teacher

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928267459     PISSN: 13562517     EISSN: 14701294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2015.1020783     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway. Durham: Duke University Press.
2. Bayne, S. 2015. “Posthumanism and Research in Digital Education.” In SAGE Handbook of E-learning Research, edited by Caroline Haythornthwaite. London: SAGE.
3. Bayne, S. 2014. “What’s the Matter with ‘Technology Enhanced Learning?’” Learning, Media and Technology 40: 5–20. doi:10.1080/17439884.2014.915851.
4. Biesta, G. J. J. 1998. “Pedagogy without Humanism: Foucault and the Subject of Education.” Interchange 29 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1023/A:1007472819086.
5. Braidotti, R. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
6. Clarke, A. C. 1980. “Electronic Tutors.” Omni Magazine, June.
7. Clegg, S., A. Hudson, and J. Steel. 2003. “The Emperor’s New Clothes: Globalisation and E-learning in Higher Education.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 24 (1): 39–53. doi:10.1080/01425690301914.
8. Edwards, R. 2010. “The End of Lifelong Learning: A Post-human Condition?” Studies in the Education of Adults 42 (1): 5–17.
9. Feenberg, A. 2003. “Modernity Theory and Technology Studies: Reflections on Bridging the Gap.” In Modernity and Technology, edited by Thomas J. Misa, Philip Brey, and Andrew Feenberg, 73–104. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
10. Graham, E. L. 2002. Representations of the Post/Human: Monsters, Aliens and Others in Popular Culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
11. Hacking, I. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Hamilton, Edward C., and Norm Friesen. 2013. “Online Education: A Science and Technology Studies Perspective.” Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology 39 (2): 1–21.
13. Haugsbakk, G., and Y. Nordkvelle. 2007. “The Rhetoric of ICT and the New Language of Learning: A Critical Analysis of the Use of ICT in the Curricular Field.” European Educational Research Journal 6 (1): 1–12. doi:10.2304/eerj.2007.6.1.1.
14. Lather, P., and E. St. Pierre. 2013. “Post-qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 26 (6): 629–633.
15. Latour, B. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Latour, B. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30 (2): 225–248. doi:10.1086/421123.
17. Laurillard, D. 2011. Productivity: Achieving Higher Quality and More Effective Learning in Affordable and Acceptable ways. A draft research briefing document from the technology‐enhanced learning research programme. Accessed December 2, 2014. http://www.tlrp.org/docs/ProdBeta.pdf.
18. McKay, R. 2005. “‘Identifying with the Animals’: Language, Subjectivity and the Animal Politics of Margaret Atwood’s Surfacing.” In Figuring Animals: Essays on Animal Images in Art, Literature, Philosophy and Popular Culture, edited by M. S. Pollock and C. Rainwater, 207–227. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
19. Pedersen, H. 2010. “Is the ‘Posthuman’ Educable? On the Convergence of Educational Philosophy, Animal Studies, and Posthumanist Theory.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 31 (2): 237–250. doi:10.1080/01596301003679750.
20. Pedersen, H. 2012. “Education, Animals, and the Commodity Form.” Culture and Organization 18 (5): 415–432. doi:10.1080/14759551.2012.728395.
21. Pedersen, H. 2013. “‘Follow the Judas Sheep: Materializing Post-qualitative Methodology in Zooethnographic Space.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 26 (6): 717–731. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.788760.
22. Pickering, A. 2005. “Asian Eels and Global Warming: A Posthumanist Perspective on Society and the Environment.” Ethics and the Environment 10 (2): 29–43. doi:10.2979/ETE.2005.10.2.29.
23. Snaza, N. 2013. “Bewildering Education.” Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy 10 (1): 38–54. doi:10.1080/15505170.2013.783889.
24. Suppes, P. 1966. “The Uses of Computers in Education.” Scientific American 215 (2): 206–220.
25. Underwood, J., and R. Luckin. 2011. What Is AIED and Why Does Education Need It? A Report for the UK’s TLRP Technology Enhanced Learning – Artificial Intelligence in Education Theme. Accessed December 2, 2014. http://tel.ioe.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/telaied_whyaied.pdf.
26. Usher, R., and R. Edwards. 1994. Postmodernism and Education. London: Routledge.
27. Winograd, T., and F. Flores. 1987. Understanding Computers and Cognition. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
28. Wolfe, C. 2010. What Is Posthumanism? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
29. Woolfe, B. P. 2010. A Roadmap for Education Technology. Accessed December 2, 2014. http://www.cra.org/ccc/files/docs/groe/GROE%20Roadmap%20for%20Education%20Technology%20Final%20Report.pdf.