The end of lifelong learning: A post-human condition?

Studies in the Education of Adults

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 5-17

  Edwards, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84858657720     PISSN: 02660830     EISSN: 14789833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02660830.2010.11661585     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Badmington, N., (2003) ‘Theorising posthumanism’, Cultural Critique, 53, pp. 10–27.
2. Barad, K., (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway, Durham: Duke University Press.
3. Beck, U., (1992) The Risk Society, London: Sage.
4. Biesta, G., (1998) ‘Say you want a revolution…. Suggestions for the impossible future of critical pedagogy’, Educational Theory, 48, pp. 499–510.
5. Biesta, G., (2004) ‘Against learning: Reclaiming a language for education in an age of learning’, Nordisk Pedogogik, 24, pp. 70–82.
6. Bowker, G., and Star, S., (1999) Sorting Things Out, Harvard: Harvard University Press.
7. Butler, J., (1993) Bodies That Matter, London: Routledge.
8. Derrida, J., (1992) The Other Heading: Reflections on Today's Europe, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
9. Edwards, R., (2008) ‘Education—an impossible practice’, Scottish Education Review, 40, pp. 4–11.
10. Fenwick, T., (2009) ‘Responsibility, complexity science and education: Dilemmas and uncertain responses’, Studies in Philosophy and Education, 28, pp. 101–18.
11. Gough, N., (2004) ‘RhizomANTically becoming-cyborg: performing posthuman pedagogies’, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36, 3, pp. 253–65.
12. Grosz, E., (2009) ‘The thing’, in F., Candlin and R., Guins (eds) The Object Reader, London: Routledge.
13. Hacking, I., (1983) Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Hacking, I., (1999) The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
15. Haraway, D., (1997) Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience, New York: Routledge.
16. Haraway, D., (2000) How Like a Leaf: An Interview with Thyrza Nichols Goodeve, London: Routledge.
17. Haraway, D., (2003) ‘Interview with Donna Haraway’, in D., Ihde and E., Selinger (eds) Chasing Technoscience: Matrix for Materiality, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
18. Heidegger, M., (2009) ‘The thing’, in F., Candlin and R., Guins (eds) The Object Reader, London: Routledge.
19. Henare, A., Holbraad, M., and Wastell, S., (2007) ‘Introduction: thinking through things’, in A., Henare, M., Holbraad and S., Wastell (eds) Thinking Through Things: Theorising Artefacts Ethnographically, London: Routledge.
20. Latour, B., (1993) We Have Never Been Modern, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
21. Latour, B., (1996) Aramis, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
22. Latour, B., (1999) Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
23. Latour, B., (2004) ‘Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern’, Critical Inquiry, 30, pp. 225–48.
24. Latour, B., (2005) Reassembling the Social, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Latour, B., (2008) What Is the Style of Matters of Concern? Amsterdam: Van Gorcum.
26. Law, J., (2004) ‘Matter-ing, Or How Might STS Contribute?’ published by the Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YL, UK at http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/socioogy/papers/law-matter-ing.pdf (accessed 15 May 2009).
27. Lyotard, J-F., (1984) The Postmodern Condition, Manchester: Manchester University Press. Lyotard, J-F., (1992) The Postmodern Explained to Children, London: Turnaround.
28. Mol, A., (2002) The Body Multiple, Durham: Duke University Press.
29. Osberg, D., and Biesta, G., (2007) ‘Beyond presence: epistemological and pedagogical implications of ‘strong’ emergence’, Interchange, 38, pp. 31–51.
30. Rose, N., (1998) Inventing Our Selves, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.