Role of Rhipicephalus microplus cheliceral receptors in gustation and host differentiation

Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 228-233

  Ferreira, Lorena Lopes ^a   Soares, Sara Fernandes ^a   de Oliveira Filho, Jaires Gomes ^a   Oliveira, Thaynara Tatielly ^a   Pérez de León, Adalberto A ^b   Borges, Lígia Miranda Ferreira ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF GOIÁS   (Brazil)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Blood feeding; Cheliceral sensilla; Electrophysiology; Gustation; Host selection; Rhipicephalus microplus

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; GLUCOSE; GLUTATHIONE; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD SAMPLING; BOS INDICUS; BOS TAURUS; CHELICERATE; CHEMORECEPTOR; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HOST RANGE; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RHIPICEPHALUS (BOOPHILUS) MICROPLUS; SENSILLUM; TASTE DISCRIMINATION; TASTE PREFERENCE; ANIMAL; BOVINE; CATTLE DISEASE; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; MALE; PARASITOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RHIPICEPHALUS; TASTE; TICK INFESTATION; VETERINARY;

ANIMALIA; BOS; BOS INDICUS; BOS TAURUS; IXODIDA; RHIPICEPHALUS;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASES; DISEASE SUSCEPTIBILITY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; FEMALE; HOST SPECIFICITY; MALE; RHIPICEPHALUS; SENSILLA; TASTE; TICK INFESTATIONS;

EID: 84928213200     PISSN: 1877959X     EISSN: 18779603     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.12.008     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Allan S. Chemical ecology of tick-host interactions. Olfaction in Vector-host Interactions: Ecology and Control of Vector-borne Diseases 2010, vol. 2:327-348. Wagenging Academic Publishers, Netherlands.
2. Angus B.M. The history of the cattle tick Boophilus microplus in Australia and achievements in its control. Int. J. Parasitol. 1996, 26:1341-1355.
3. Amstutz H.E. Manual Merck de Veterinária 2014, Roca, São Paulo. 10th ed.
4. Arthur D.R. Ticks and Disease 1961, Row, Peterson and Co, Evanston, IL.
5. Aubry P., Geale D.W. A review of bovine anaplasmosis. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2011, 58:1-30.
6. Balashov Y.S. Bloodsucking ticks (Ixodoidea) - vectors of diseases of man and animals. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1972, 8:160-376.
7. Brake D.K., Pérez de León A.A. Immunoregulation of bovine macrophages by factors in the salivary glands of Rhipicephalus microplus. Parasites Vectors 2012, 5:38-46.
8. Brown P.R., Agarwal R.P., Gell J., Parks R.E. Nucleotide metabolism in the whole blood of various vertebrates: enzyme levels and the use of high pressure liquid chromatography for the determination of nucleotide patterns. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1972, 43B:891-904.
9. Carvalho W.A., Bechara H.G., More D.D., Ferreira B.R., Da Silva L.S., Santos I.K.F.M. Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus: distinct acute phase proteins vary during infestations according to the genetic composition of the bovine hosts, Bos taurus and Bos indicus. Exp. Parasitol. 2008, 118:587-591.
10. Carvalho W.A., Franzin A.M., Abatepaulo A.R.R., Oliveira C.J.F., Moré D.D., Silva J.S., Ferreira B.R., Santos I.K.F.M. Modulation of cutaneous inflammation induced by ticks in contrasting phenotypes of infestation in bovines. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 167:260-273.
11. Carvalho W.A., Ianella P., Arnoldi F.G.C., Caetano A.R., Maruyama S.R.C., Conti L.H.A., da Silva M.R.M., Paula J.O.F., Maia A.A.M., de Miranda Santos I.K.F. Haplotypes of the bovine IgG2 heavy gamma chain in tick-resistant and tick-susceptible breeds of cattle. Immunogenetics 2011, 63:319-324.
12. Chapman R.F. Contact chemoreception in feeding by phytophagous insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2003, 48:455-484.
13. Constantinoiu C.C., Jackson L.A., Jorgensen W.K., Lew-Tabor A.E., Piper E.K., Mayer D.G., Venus B., Jonsson N.N. Local immune response against larvae of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in Bos taurus indicus and Bos taurus taurus cattle. Int. J. Parasitol. 2010, 40:865-875.
14. Dethier V.G. The taste of salt. Am. Sci. 1977, 65:744-751.
15. Galun R., Kindler S.H. Chemical basis of feeding in the tick Ornithodoros tholozani. J. Insect Physiol. 1968, 14:1409-1421.
16. Galun R., Kindler S.H. Glutathione as an inducer of feeding in ticks. Science 1965, 147:166-167.
17. Grisi L., Leite R.C., Martins J.R.S., Barros A.T.M., Andreotti R., Cançado P.H.D., Pérez de León A.A., Pereira J.B., Villela H.S. Reassessment of the potential economic impact of cattle parasites in Brazil. Braz. J. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 23:150-156.
18. Hodgson E.S., Lettvin J.Y., Roeder K.D. Physiology of a primary chemoreceptor unit. Science 1955, 122:417-418.
19. Ibelli A.M.G., Ribeiro A.R.B., Giglioti R., Regitano L.C.A., Alencar M.M., Chagas A.C.S., Paço A.L., Oliveira H.N., Duarte J.M.S., Oliveira M.C.S. Resistance of cattle of various genetic groups to the tick Rhipicephalus microplus and the relationship with coat traits. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 186:425-430.
20. Ibelli A.M.G. Avaliação da resposta de bovinos Nelore e cruzados, Senepol×Nelore e Angus×Nelore, infestados com carrapatos Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus 2012, (Tese (Doutorado em Genética Evolutiva e Biologia Molecular)), Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos.
21. Jonsson N.N., Matschoss A.L., Pepper P., Green P.E., Ansell J. Resistance of Holstein-Friesian cows to infestation by the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus). Vet. Parasitol. 2000, 89:297-305.
22. Kashino S.S., Resende J., Sacco A.M., Rocha C., Proenca L., Carvalho W.A., Firmino A.A., Queiroz R., Benavides M., Gershwin L.J., De Miranda Santos I.K.F. Boophilus microplus: the pattern of bovine immunoglobulin isotype responses to high and low tick infestations. Exp. Parasitol. 2005, 110:12-21.
23. Marion-Poll F., Descoins C. Taste detection of phytoecdysteroids in larvae of Bombyx mori, Spodoptera littoralis and Ostrinia nubilalis. J. Insect Physiol. 2002, 48:467-476.
24. Marion-Poll F., Pers J. Un-filtered recordings from insect taste sensilla. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1996, 80:113-115.
25. Moorhouse D.E., Tatchell R.J. The feeding processes of the cattle-tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini): a study in host-parasite relations. Part I. Attachment to the host. Parasitology 1966, 56:623-632.
26. Morris C.A. A review of genetic resistance to disease in Bos taurus cattle. Vet. J. 2007, 174:481-491.
27. Nari A. Strategies for the control of one-host ticks and relationship with tick-borne diseases in South America. Vet. Parasitol. 1995, 57:153-165.
28. Pérez de León A.A., Vannier E., Almazán C., Krause P.J. Tick-borne protozoa. Biology of Ticks 2014, vol. 2:147-179. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 2nd ed.
29. Piper E.K., Jonsson N.N., Gondro C., Lew-Tabor A.E., Moolhuijzen P., Vance M.E., Jackson L.A. Immunological profiles of Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle infested with the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2009, 16:1074-1086.
30. R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2010, R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
31. Rharrabe K., Sayah F., Marion Poll F. Gustatory perception of phytoecdysteroids in Plodia interpunctella larvae. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2011, 138:33-39.
32. Richter D., Matuschka F.R., Spielman A., Mahadevan L. How ticks get under your skin: insertion mechanics of the feeding apparatus of Ixodes ricinus ticks. Proc. R. Soc. B 2013, 280:20131758.
33. Rodriguez-Vivaz R.I., Pérez-Cogollo L.C., Rosado-Aguilar J.A., Ojeda-Chi M.M., Trinidad-Martinez I., Miller R.J., Li A.Y., Pérez de León A., Guerrero F., Klafke G. Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus resistant to acaricides and ivermectin in cattle farms of Mexico. Braz. J. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 23:113-122.
34. Shyma K.P., Gupta J.P., Singh V. Breeding strategies for tick resistance in tropical cattle: a sustainable approach for tick control. J. Parasit. Dis. 2013, 10.1007/s12639-013-0294-5.
35. Silva J.B., Rangel C.P., Baêta B.A., Fonseca A.H. Analysis of the risk factors relating to cows' resistance to Rhipicephalus microplus ticks during the peripartum. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2014, 63:551-557.
36. Silva A.M., Alencar M.M., Regitano L.C.A., Oliveira M.C.S. Infestação natural de fêmeas bovinas de corte por ectoparasitas na região Sudeste do Brasil. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2010, 39:1477-1482.
37. Šimo L., Sonenshine D.E., Park Y., Zitnan D. Nervous and sensory systems: structure, functions, genomics and proteomics. Biology of Ticks 2014, vol. 1:309-367. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 2nd ed.
38. Smedley S.R., Eisner T. Sodium uptake by puddling in a moth. Science 1995, 270:1816-1818.
39. Soares S.F., Louly C.C.B., Marion-Poll F., Ribeiro M.F.B., Borges L.M.F. Study on cheliceral sensilla of the brown tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Latreille, 1806) (Acari:Ixodidae) involved in taste perception of phagostimulants. Acta Trop. 2013, 126:75-83.
40. Soares S.F., Louly C.C.B., Neves C.A., Marion-Poll F., Borges L.M.F. Detection of phytoecdysteroids by gustatory sensilla on chelicerae of the brown dog tick Rhipicephalus sanguineus. Physiol. Entomol. 2012, 37:241-249.
41. Sonenshine D.E. Biology of Ticks 1993, Oxford University Press, New York. 1st ed.
42. Sonenshine D.E., Anderson J.M. Mouthparts and digestive system: antomy and molecular biology feeding and digestion. Biology of Ticks 2014, vol. 1:122-162. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 2nd ed.
43. Sonenshine D.E., Taylor M., Carson K.A. Chemically mediated behavior in acari: adaptions for finding hosts and mates. J. Chem. Ecol. 1986, 12:1091-1198.
44. Tanaka Y., Asaoka K., Takeda S. Different feeding and gustatory responses to ecdysone and 20-hydroxyecdysone by larvae of the silkworm Bombyx mori. J. Chem. Ecol. 1994, 20:125-133.
45. Tatchell R.J. The ionic regulatory role of the salivary secretion of the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus. J. Insect Physiol. 1969, 15:1421-1430.
46. Vaz I.S., Martinez R.H.M., Oliveira A., Heck A., Logullo C., Gonzales J.C., Dewes H., Masuda A. Functional bovine immunoglobulins in Boophilus microplus hemolymph. Vet. Parasitol. 1996, 62:155-160.
47. Veríssimo C.J., Nicolau C.V.J., Cardoso V.L., Pinheiro M.G. Haircoat characteristics and tick infestation on Gyr (Zebu) and crossbred (Holstein×Gyr) cattle. Arch. Zootec. 2002, 5:389-392.
48. Villares J.B. Climatologia zootécnica III. Contribuição ao estudo da resistência e suscetibilidade genética dos bovinos ao Boophilus microplus. Bol. Ind. Anim. 1941, 4:60-79.
49. Viviano K.R., Lavergne S.N., Goodman L., Vanderwielen B., Grundahl L., Padilla M., Trepanier L.A. Glutathione, cysteine, and ascorbate concentrations in clinically ill dogs and cats. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2009, 23:250-257.
50. Waladde S.M. The sensory nervous system of the adult cattle tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) Ixodidae. Part I. Light microscopy. J. Aust. Entomol. 1976, 15:379-387.
51. Waladde S.M. The sensory nervous system of the adult cattle tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) Ixodidae. Part II. Scanning electron microscopy. Aust. J. Entomol. 1977, 16:73-79.
52. Waladde S.M., Kemp D.H., Rice M.J. Feeding electrograms and fluid uptake measurements of cattle tick Boophilus microplus attached on artificial membranes. Int. J. Parasitol. 1979, 9:89-95.
53. Waladde S.M., Rice M.J. The sensory nervous system of the adult cattle tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) Ixodidae. Part III. Ultra-structure and electrophysiology of the cheliceral receptors. Aust. J. Entomol. 1977, 16:441-453.
54. Waladde S.M., Rice M.J. The sensory basis of tick feeding behaviour. Physiology of Ticks 1982, 71-118. Pergamon, Oxford. F.D. Obenchain, R. Galun (Eds.).
55. Wambura P.N., Gwakisa P.S., Silayo R.S., Rugaimukamu E.A. Breed-associated resistance to tick infestation in Bos indicus and their crosses with Bos taurus. Vet. Parasitol. 1998, 77:63-70.
56. Wikel S.K. Tick-host interactions. Biology of Ticks 2014, vol. 2:88-128. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 2nd ed.
57. Wilkinson P.R. Observations on infestations of undipped cattle of British breeds with the cattle tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1955, 6:655-665.