Local immune response against larvae of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in Bos taurus indicus and Bos taurus taurus cattle

International Journal for Parasitology

Volumn 40, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 865-875

  Constantinoiu, C C ^a,b,c   Jackson, L A ^a,b   Jorgensen, W K ^a,b   Lew Tabor, A E ^a,b,d   Piper, E K ^a,c   Mayer, D G ^b   Venus, B ^b,c   Jonsson, N N ^a,c  

^a Cooperative Research Centre for Beef Genetic Technologies ^*  (Australia)

^b DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND FISHERIES   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^d MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Bos taurus indicus; Bos taurus taurus; Cattle; Host immune response; Immunohistochemistry; Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus; Skin

Indexed keywords

MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGEN CLASS 2;

ANTIGEN; BIOCHEMISTRY; CATTLE; GENE EXPRESSION; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTION; IMMUNE RESPONSE; LARVA; PARASITE; SKIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; B LYMPHOCYTE; BOS TAURUS INDICUS; BOS TAURUS TAURUS; CATTLE; CELL INFILTRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GRANULOCYTE; IMMUNE RESPONSE; INFESTATION; LARVA; LEUKOCYTE; NONHUMAN; PUNCH BIOPSY; RHIPICEPHALUS; RHIPICEPHALUS MICROPLUS; T LYMPHOCYTE;

ANIMALS; BIOPSY; CATTLE; CATTLE DISEASES; FEMALE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; LARVA; LEUKOCYTES; MICROSCOPY; RHIPICEPHALUS; SKIN; TICK INFESTATIONS;

ANIMALIA; BOOPHILUS; BOS; BOS INDICUS; BOS TAURUS; RHIPICEPHALUS;

EID: 77952542834     PISSN: 00207519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Barclay A., Brown M., Alex Law S., McNight A., Tomlinison M., Anton van der Merwe P. The Leukocyte Antigen Factsbook 1997, Academic Press, San Diego.
2. Barriga O.O., da Silva S.S., Azevedo J.S. Inhibition and recovery of tick functions in cattle repeatedly infested with Boophilus microplus. J. Parasitol. 1993, 79:710-715.
3. Belkaid Y. Regulatory T cells and infection: a dangerous necessity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2007, 7:875-888.
4. Bennett G.F. Boophilus microplus (acarina: ixodidae): experimental infestations on cattle restrained from grooming. Exp. Parasitol. 1969, 26:323-328.
5. Bensaid A., Hadam M. Individual antigens of cattle. Bovine CD4 (BoCD4). Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1991, 27:51-54.
6. Boppana D.K., Wikel S.K., Raj D.G., Manohar M.B., Lalitha J. Cellular infiltration at skin lesions and draining lymph nodes of sheep infested with adult Hyalomma anatolicum anatolicum ticks. Parasitology 2005, 131:657-667.
7. Born W.K., Reardon C., O'Brien R.L. The function of γδ T cells in innate immunity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2006, 18:31-38.
8. Collins R.A., Werling D., Duggan S.E., Bland A.P., Parsons K.R., Howard C.J. Gammadelta T cells present antigen to CD4+ alphabeta T cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 1998, 63:707-714.
9. Davis W.C., MacHugh N.D., Park Y.H., Hamilton M.J., Wyatt C.R. Identification of a monoclonal antibody reactive with the bovine orthologue of CD3 (BoCD3). Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1993, 39:85-91.
10. Gosselin E.J., Wardwell K., Rigby W.F., Guyre P.M. Induction of MHC class II on human polymorphonuclear neutrophils by granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor, IFN-gamma, and IL-3. J. Immunol. 1993, 151:1482-1490.
11. Gutierrez M., Forster F.I., McConnell S.A., Cassidy J.P., Pollock J.M., Bryson D.G. The detection of CD2+, CD4+, CD8+, and WC1+ T lymphocytes, B cells and macrophages in fixed and paraffin embedded bovine tissue using a range of antigen recovery and signal amplification techniques. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1999, 71:321-334.
12. Hein W.R., Dudler L. TCR gamma delta+ cells are prominent in normal bovine skin and express a diverse repertoire of antigen receptors. Immunology 1997, 91:58-64.
13. Jones M., Cordell J.L., Beyers A.D., Tse A.G., Mason D.Y. Detection of T and B cells in many animal species using cross-reactive anti-peptide antibodies. J. Immunol. 1993, 150:5429-5435.
14. Kashino S.S., Resende J., Sacco A.M., Rocha C., Proenca L., Carvalho W.A., Firmino A.A., Queiroz R., Benavides M., Gershwin L.J., De Miranda Santos I.K. Boophilus microplus: the pattern of bovine immunoglobulin isotype responses to high and low tick infestations. Exp. Parasitol. 2005, 110:12-21.
15. Keresztes G., Takacs L., Vilmos P., Kurucz E., Ando I. Monoclonal antibodies detecting components of the bovine immune system in formaldehyde-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue specimens. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1996, 52:383-392.
16. Koudstaal D., Kemp D.H., Kerr J.D. Boophilus microplus: rejection of larvae from British breed cattle. Parasitology 1978, 76:379-386.
17. + γδT cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2006, 80:939-951.
18. Larregina A.T., Falo L.D. Changing paradigms in cutaneous immunology: adapting with dendritic cells. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2005, 124:1-12.
19. Liebana E., Marsh S., Gough J., Nunez A., Vordermeier H.M., Whelan A., Spencer Y., Clifton-Hardley R., Hewinson G., Johnson L. Distribution and activation of T-lymphocyte subsets in tuberculous bovine lymph-node granulomas. Vet. Pathol. 2007, 44:366-372.
20. Loser K., Beissert S. Dendritic cells and T cells in the regulation of cutaneous immunity. Adv. Dermatol. 2007, 23:307-333.
21. Mans B.J., Andersen J.F., Francischetti I.M., Valenzuela J.G., Schwan T.G., Pham V.M., Garfield M.K., Hammer C.H., Ribeiro J.M. Comparative sialomics between hard and soft ticks: implications for the evolution of blood-feeding behavior. Insect. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2008, 38:42-58.
22. Mbow M.L., Rutti B., Brossard M. Infiltration of CD4+ CD8+ T cells, and expression of ICAM-1, Ia antigens, IL-1 alpha and TNF-alpha in the skin lesion of BALB/c mice undergoing repeated infestations with nymphal Ixodes ricinus ticks. Immunology 1994, 82:596-602.
23. Moorhouse D.E., Tatchell R.J. The feeding processes of the cattle-tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini): a study in host-parasite relations. I. Attachment to the host. Parasitology 1966, 56:623-632.
24. Morrison W.I., Davis W.C. Individual antigens of cattle. Differentiation antigens expressed predominantly on CD4- CD8- T lymphocytes (WC1, WC2). Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1991, 27:71-76.
25. Naessens J., Nthale J.M., Muiya P. Biochemical analysis of preliminary clusters in the non-lineage panel. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 1996, 52:347-356.
26. Piper E.K., Jackson L.A., Bagnall N.H., Kongsuwan K.K., Lew A.E., Jonsson N.N. Gene expression in the skin of Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle infested with the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 2008, 126:110-119.
27. Piper E.K., Jonsson N.N., Gondro C., Lew-Tabor A.E., Moolhuijzen P., Vance M.E., Jackson L.A. Immunological profiles of Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle infested with the cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2009, 16:1074-1086.
28. Piper E.K., Jackson L.A., Bielefeldt-Ohmann H., Gondro C., Lew-Tabor A.E., Jonsson N.N. Tick-susceptible Bos taurus cattle display an increased cellular response at the site of larval Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus attachment, compared with tick-resistant Bos indicus cattle. Int. J. Parasitol. 2010, 40/4:431-441.
29. Pruett J.H., Olafson P.U., Davey R.B. Serologically defined Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus larval antigens in BmLF3, a partially pure Sephacryl S-300 fraction of crude larval proteins. Vet. Parasitol. 2008, 155:264-272.
30. Rechav Y., Kostrzewski M.W. Relative resistance of six cattle breeds to the tick Boophilus decoloratus in South Africa. Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 1991, 58:181-186.
31. Riek R.F. Factors influencing the susceptibility of cattle to tick infestation. Aust. Vet. J. 1956, 32:204-208.
32. Roberts J.A. Resistance of cattle to the tick Boophilus microplus (canestrini). II. Stages of the life cycle of the parasite against which resistance is manifest. J. Parasitol. 1968, 54:667-673.
33. Roberts J.A. Acquisition by the Host of Resistance to the Cattle Tick, Boophilus microplus (Canestrini). J. Parasitol. 1968, 54:657-662.
34. Roberts J.A., Kerr J.D. Boophilus microplus: passive transfer of resistance in cattle. J. Parasitol. 1976, 62:485-488.
35. Rowell, R., Walters, D., 1976. Analysing data with repeated observations on each experimental unit. J. Agric. Sci. 87.
36. Schleger A.V., Lincoln D.T., McKenna R.V., Kemp D.H., Roberts J.A. Boophilus microplus: cellular responses to larval attachment and their relationship to host resistance. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1976, 29:499-512.
37. Schleger A.V., Lincoln D.T., Bourne A.S. Arteriovenous anastomoses in the dermal vasculature of the skin of Bos taurus cattle, and their relationship with resistance to the tick, Boophilus microplus. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1981, 34:27-35.
38. Schleger A.V., Lincoln D.T., Kemp D.H. A putative role for eosinophils in tick rejection. Experientia 1981, 37:49-50.
39. Seifert G.W. Variations between and within breeds of cattle in resistance to field infestations of the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1971, 22:159-168.
40. Stewart N.P., Callow L.L., Duncalfe F. Biological comparisons between a laboratory-maintained and a recently isolated field strain of Boophilus microplus. J. Parasitol. 1982, 68:691-694.
41. Tatchell R.J., Moorhouse D.E. The feeding processes of the cattle tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini). II. The sequence of host-tissue changes. Parasitology 1968, 58:441-459.
42. Tatchell R.J., Moorhouse D.E. Neutrophils: their role in the formation of a tick feeding lesion. Science 1970, 167:1002-1003.
43. Taylor B.C., Choi K.Y., Scibienski R.J., Moore P.F., Stott J.L. Differential expression of bovine MHC class II antigens identified by monoclonal antibodies. J. Leukoc. Biol. 1993, 53:479-489.
44. Turni C., Lee R.P., Jackson L.A. Effect of salivary gland extracts from the tick, Boophilus microplus, on leucocytes from Brahman and Hereford cattle. Parasite Immunol. 2002, 24:355-361.
45. Utech K.B., Wharton R.H., Kerr J.D. Resistance to Boophils microplus (Canestrini) in different breeds of cattle. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1978, 29:885-895.
46. Valent P., Bettelheim P. Cell surface structures on human basophils and mast cells: biochemical and functional characterization. Adv. Immunol. 1992, 52:333-423.
47. Wagland B.M. Host resistance to cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) in Brahman (Bos indicus) cattle. II. The dynamics of resistance in previously unexposed and exposed cattle. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1978, 29:395-400.
48. Wagland B.M. Host resistance to cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) in Brahman (Bos indicus) cattle. IV Ages of ticks rejected. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1979, 30:211-218.
49. Wardlaw A.J., Moqbel R., Kay A.B. Eosinophils: biology and role in disease. Adv. Immunol. 1995, 60:151-266.
50. Wharton R.H., Harley K.L.S., Wilkinson P.R., Utech K.B., Kelley B.M. A comparison of the cattle tick control by pasture spelling, planned dipping and tick-resistant cattle. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1969, 20:783-797.
51. Wikel S.K. Tick modulation of host immunity: an important factor in pathogen transmission. Int. J. Parasitol. 1999, 29:851-859.
52. Willadsen P., Williams P.G., Roberts J.A., Kerr J.D. Responses of cattle to allergens from Boophilus microplus. Int. J. Parasitol. 1978, 8:89-95.
53. Willadsen P. Immunity to ticks. Adv. Parasitol. 1980, 18:293-311.
54. Willadsen, P., Bird, P., Cobon, G.S., Hungerford, J., 1995. Commercialisation of a recombinant vaccine against Boophilus microplus. Parasitology 110(Suppl), S43-S50.