Relationships among personality, situational construal and social outcomes

European Journal of Personality

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 97-106

  Morse, Patrick J ^a   Sauerberger, Kyle S ^a   Todd, Elysia ^a   Funder, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Personality; Situational construal; Situations; Social outcomes

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928200741     PISSN: 08902070     EISSN: 10990984     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/per.1987     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abelson, R. P. (1985). A variance explanation paradox: When a little is a lot. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 129-133. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.97.1.129
2. Anderson, C., John, O. P., Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 116-132. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.116
3. Arnulf J. K., Larsen K. R., Martinsen Ø. L., & Bong, C. H. (2014). Predicting survey responses: How and why semantics shape survey statistics on organizational behaviour. PLoS ONE 9(9): e106361. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106361
4. Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2011). A closer look at first sight: Social relations lens model analysis of personality and interpersonal attraction at zero acquaintance. European Journal of Personality, 25, 225-238. DOI: 10.1002/per.790
5. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements. Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396-403.
6. Berrios, R., Totterdell, P., & Niven, K. (2015). Why do you make us feel good? Correlates and interpersonal consequences of affective presence in speed-dating. European Journal of Personality, 29, 72-82.
7. Berry, D. S., & Hansen, J. S. (1996). Positive affect, negative affect, and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 796-809. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.796
8. Biesanz, J. C. (2010). The social accuracy model of interpersonal perception: Assessing individual differences in perceptive and expressive accuracy. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 853-885.
9. Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (in press, 2015). Statistically small effects of the implicit association test can have societally large effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000016
10. Finn, C., Mitte, K., & Neyer, F. J. (2013). The relationship-specific interpretation bias mediates the link between neuroticism and satisfaction in couples. European Journal of Personality, 27, 200-212. DOI: 10.1002/per.1862
11. Funder, D. C. (2013). Taking situations seriously. Honolulu: Division 8 Presidential Address, American Psychological Association.
12. Funder, D. C., Furr, R. M., & Colvin, C. R. (2000). The Riverside Behavioral Q-sort: A tool for the description of social behavior. Journal of Personality, 68, 451-489.
13. Furr, R. M. (2008). A framework for profile similarity: Integrating similarity, normativeness, and distinctiveness. Journal of Personality, 76, 1267-1316.
14. Hill, P. L., Turiano, N. A., Mroczek, D. K., & Roberts, B. W. (2012). Examining concurrent and longitudinal relations between personality traits and social well-being in adulthood. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 698-705. DOI: 10.1177/1948550611433888
15. Ilmarinen, V., Vainikainen, M., Verkasalo, M., & Lönnqvist, J. (2015). Why are extraverts more popular? Oral fluency mediates the effect of extraversion on popularity in middle childhood. European Journal of Personality, 29, 138-151.
16. John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research.(pp. 114-158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
17. John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory-Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
18. Kelly, H. H. (1950). The warm-cold variable in first impressions of persons. Journal of Personality, 18, 431-439.
19. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
20. Morse, P. J., Neel, R., Todd, E., & Funder, D. C. (in press). Renovating situation taxonomies: Exploring the construction and content of fundamental motive situation types. Journal of Personality.
21. Morse, P. J., Sweeny, K., & Legg, A. M. (2015). A situational construal approach to healthcare experiences. Manuscript submitted for publication.
22. Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
23. Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401-421. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127
24. Paunonen, S. V. (2003). Big Five factors of personality and replicated predictions of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 411-424. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.411
25. Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007). The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 313-345. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x
26. Schaffhuser, K., Allemand, M., & Martin, M. (2014). Personality traits and relationship satisfaction in intimate couples: Three perspectives on personality. European Journal of Personality, 28, 120-133. DOI: 10.1002/per.1948
27. Serfass, D. G., & Sherman, R. A. (2013). Personality and perceptions of situations from the Thematic Apperception Test. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 708-718. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.06.007
28. Sherman, R. A., Nave, C. S., & Funder, D. C. (2013). Situational construal is related to personality and gender. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 1-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.10.008
29. Stopfer, J. M., Egloff, B., Nestler, S., & Back, M. D. (2013). Being popular in online social networks: How agentic, communal, and creativity traits relate to judgments of status and liking. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 592-598. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.005
30. Ten Berge, M. A., & De Raad, B. (1999). Taxonomies of situations from a trait psychological perspective: A review. European Journal of Personality, 13, 337-360. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199909/10)13:5<337::AID-PER363>3.0.CO;2-F
31. Ten Berge, M. A., & De Raad, B. (2001). The construction of a joint taxonomy of traits and situations. European Journal of Personality, 15, 253-276. DOI: 10.1002/per.410
32. Ten Berge, M. A., & De Raad, B. (2002). The structure of situations from a personality perspective. European Journal of Personality, 16, 81-102. DOI: 10.1002/per.435
33. Vater, A., & Schröder-Abé, M. (2015). Explaining the link between personality and relationship satisfaction: Emotion regulation and interpersonal behavior in conflict discussions. European Journal of Personality, 29, 201-215.
34. Wagerman, S. A., & Funder, D. C. (2009). Situations. In P. J. Corr & G. Matthews (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of personality (pp. 27-42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.