Clustering of mammalian Hox genes with other H3K27me3 targets within an active nuclear domain

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 112, Issue 15, 2015, Pages 4672-4677

  Vieux Rochas, Maxence ^a   Fabre, Pierre J ^a   Leleu, Marion ^a   Duboule, Denis ^a,b   Noordermeer, Daan ^a,c  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^c INSTITUTE FOR INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGY OF THE CELL I2BC   (France)

Author keywords

Hox genes; Long range chromatin contacts; Nuclear organization; Polycomb

Indexed keywords

HISTONE H3; HISTONE H3K27ME3; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; HISTONE; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEIN; LAMIN B; LAMIN B1; LYSINE; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; POLYCOMB GROUP PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

ARTICLE; CELL NUCLEUS; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; GENE CLUSTER; GENE INTERACTION; HOX GENE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ANIMAL; ANIMAL EMBRYO; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL CULTURE; CHROMOSOME; CYTOLOGY; DNA MICROARRAY; EMBRYOLOGY; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; MALE; METABOLISM; METHYLATION; MOUSE; MULTIGENE FAMILY;

MAMMALIA;

ANIMALS; CELLS, CULTURED; CHROMOSOMES, MAMMALIAN; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; HISTONES; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; LAMIN TYPE B; LYSINE; MALE; METHYLATION; MICE; MODELS, GENETIC; MULTIGENE FAMILY; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; POLYCOMB-GROUP PROTEINS; PROTEIN BINDING;

EID: 84928165183     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1504783112     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Spitz F, Furlong EE (2012) Transcription factors: From enhancer binding to developmental control. Nat Rev Genet 13(9):613-626.
2. Boyer LA, et al. (2006) Polycomb complexes repress developmental regulators in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature 441(7091):349-353.
3. Bracken AP, Dietrich N, Pasini D, Hansen KH, Helin K (2006) Genome-wide mapping of Polycomb target genes unravels their roles in cell fate transitions. Genes Dev 20(9): 1123-1136.
4. Bernstein BE, et al. (2006) A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125(2):315-326.
5. Tschopp P, Tarchini B, Spitz F, Zakany J, Duboule D (2009) Uncoupling time and space in the collinear regulation of Hox genes. PLoS Genet 5(3):e1000398.
6. Soshnikova N, Duboule D (2009) Epigenetic temporal control of mouse Hox genes in vivo. Science 324(5932):1320-1323.
7. Noordermeer D, et al. (2011) The dynamic architecture of Hox gene clusters. Science 334(6053):222-225.
8. Noordermeer D, et al. (2014) Temporal dynamics and developmental memory of 3D chromatin architecture at Hox gene loci. eLife 3:e02557.
9. Bantignies F, et al. (2011) Polycomb-dependent regulatory contacts between distant Hox loci in Drosophila. Cell 144(2):214-226.
10. Tolhuis B, et al. (2011) Interactions among Polycomb domains are guided by chromosome architecture. PLoS Genet 7(3):e1001343.
11. Denholtz M, et al. (2013) Long-range chromatin contacts in embryonic stem cells reveal a role for pluripotency factors and polycomb proteins in genome organization. Cell Stem Cell 13(5):602-616.
12. Lieberman-Aiden E, et al. (2009) Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326(5950):289-293.
13. Guelen L, et al. (2008) Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 453(7197):948-951.
14. Dixon JR, et al. (2012) Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485(7398):376-380.
15. Shen Y, et al. (2012) A map of the cis-regulatory sequences in the mouse genome. Nature 488(7409):116-120.
16. de Wit E, Braunschweig U, Greil F, Bussemaker HJ, van Steensel B (2008) Global chromatin domain organization of the Drosophila genome. PLoS Genet 4(3):e1000045.
17. Noordermeer D, et al. (2011) Variegated gene expression caused by cell-specific long-range DNA interactions. Nat Cell Biol 13(8):944-951.
18. Splinter E, et al. (2011) The inactive X chromosome adopts a unique threedimensional conformation that is dependent on Xist RNA. Genes Dev 25(13):1371-1383.
19. Peric-Hupkes D, et al. (2010) Molecular maps of the reorganization of genomenuclear lamina interactions during differentiation. Mol Cell 38(4):603-613.
20. Meuleman W, et al. (2013) Constitutive nuclear lamina-genome interactions are highly conserved and associated with A/T-rich sequence. Genome Res 23(2):270-280.
21. Zhu J, et al. (2013) Genome-wide chromatin state transitions associated with developmental and environmental cues. Cell 152(3):642-654.
22. Barbieri M, et al. (2012) Complexity of chromatin folding is captured by the strings and binders switch model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(40):16173-16178.
23. Lundin LG, Larhammar D, Hallböök F (2003) Numerous groups of chromosomal regional paralogies strongly indicate two genome doublings at the root of the vertebrates. J Struct Funct Genomics 3(1-4):53-63.
24. Sundström G, Larsson TA, Larhammar D (2008) Phylogenetic and chromosomal analyses of multiple gene families syntenic with vertebrate Hox clusters. BMC Evol Biol 8:254.
25. Spitz F, Herkenne C, Morris MA, Duboule D (2005) Inversion-induced disruption of the Hoxd cluster leads to the partition of regulatory landscapes. Nat Genet 37(8):889-893.
26. Kind J, et al. (2013) Single-cell dynamics of genome-nuclear lamina interactions. Cell 153(1):178-192.
27. Pauler FM, et al. (2009) H3K27me3 forms BLOCs over silent genes and intergenic regions and specifies a histone banding pattern on a mouse autosomal chromosome. Genome Res 19(2):221-233.
28. Schoenfelder S, et al. (2010) Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells. Nat Genet 42(1):53-61.
29. Li G, et al. (2012) Extensive promoter-centered chromatin interactions provide a topological basis for transcription regulation. Cell 148(1-2):84-98.
30. Phillips-Cremins JE (2014) Unraveling architecture of the pluripotent genome. Curr Opin Cell Biol 28:96-104.
31. Ryba T, et al. (2010) Evolutionarily conserved replication timing profiles predict long-range chromatin interactions and distinguish closely related cell types. Genome Res 20(6):761-770.
32. Morey C, Da Silva NR, Perry P, Bickmore WA (2007) Nuclear reorganisation and chromatin decondensation are conserved, but distinct, mechanisms linked to Hox gene activation. Development 134(5):909-919.