Social Accountability: What Does the Evidence Really Say?

World Development

Volumn 72, Issue , 2015, Pages 346-361

  Fox, Jonathan A ^a  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Public information access; Social accountability; State society synergy; Transparency; Voice

Indexed keywords

ACCOUNTABILITY; COLLECTIVE ACTION; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; EMPOWERMENT; META-ANALYSIS; PUBLIC SECTOR; SYNERGISM;

EID: 84928136164     PISSN: 0305750X     EISSN: 18735991     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.03.011     Document Type: Article

References (112)

1. Abers R., Keck M. Mobilizing the state: The erratic partner in Brazil's participatory water policy. Politics and Society 2009, 37(2):289-314.
2. Ackerman J. Co-governance for accountability: Beyond 'exit' and 'voice'. World Development 2004, 32(3):447-463.
3. Ackerman, J. (2005). Human rights and social accountability. World Bank social development papers, 86. Available at: http://www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/IW3P/IB/2005/07/20/000012009_20050720134205/Rendered/PDF/330110HR0and0SAc0paper0in0SDV0format.pdf.
4. Aiyar Y., Mehta S. Spectators or participants? The effects of social audits in Andhra Pradesh. Economic and Political Weekly 2015, 50(7):66-71. February 14.
5. Altschuler D. How patronage politics undermines parental participation and accountability: Community-managed schools in Honduras and Guatemala. Comparative Education Review 2013, 57(1):117-144.
6. Avritzer L. Democracy and the public space in Latin America 2002, Princeton University Press.
7. Baiocchi G., Heller P., Silva M.K. Bootstrapping democracy: Transforming local governance and civil society in Brazil 2011, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto.
8. Banerjee A.T., Banerji R., Duflo E., Glennerster R., Khemani K. The pitfalls of participatory programs: Evidence from a randomized evaluation in education in India. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 2010, 2(1):1-30.
9. Banerjee A., Glennerster R., Duflo E. Putting a band-aid on a corpse: Incentives for nurses in the Indian public health care system. Journal of the European Economic Association 2008, 6(2-3):487-500.
10. Barr, A., & Zeitlin, A. (2011). Conflict of interest as a barrier to local accountability. CSAE working paper (Center for the Study of African Economies), WPS/2011-13. Available at: http://www.csae.ox.ac.uk/workingpapers/pdfs/csae-wps-2011-13.pdf.
11. Barr, A., Mugisha, F., Serneels, P., & Zeitlin, A. (2012). Information and collective action in community-based monitoring of schools: Field and lab experimental evidence from Uganda. Working paper. Available at: http://cega.berkeley.edu/assets/cega_events/3/doc7Zeitlin-et-al_Information-and-Collective-Action-in-Community-based-mMonitoring-of-Schools.pdf.
12. Besley T., Pande R., Rao V. Participatory democracy in action: Survey Evidence from South India. Journal of the European Economic Association 2005, 3(2-3):648-657.
13. Björkman M., Svensson J. Power to the people: Evidence from a randomized field experiment on community-based monitoring in Uganda. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2009, 124(2):735-769.
14. Björkman-Nyqvist, M., Walque, D., & Svensson, J. (2014). Information is power: Experimental evidence of the long run impact of community based monitoring. World Bank policy research working paper 7015. Available at http://perseus.iies.su.se/~jsven/Power2_Jan2014.pdf.
15. Borras S. State-Society relations in land reform implementation in the Philippines. Development and Change 2001, 32:545-575.
16. Brown L.D., Fox J. Accountability within transnational coalitions. The struggle for accountability. The World Bank, NGOs and grassroots movements 1998, 439-484. MIT Press, Cambridge. J. Fox, L.D. Brown (Eds.).
17. Carlitz R. Improving transparency and accountability in the budget process: An assessment of recent initiatives. Development Policy Review 2013, 31(s1):s49-s67.
18. Spaces for change? The politics of citizen participation in new democratic arenas 2007, Zed, London. A. Cornwall, V. Schattan Coelho (Eds.).
19. D'Cruz, C., Fadrigo Cadornigara, S., & Satterthwaite, D. (2014). Tools for inclusive cities: The roles of community-based engagement and monitoring in reducing poverty. IIED working paper. International Institute for Environment and Development. Available at. http://www.academia.edu/7475688/Tools_for_Inclusive_Cities_the_Roles_of_Community-Based_Engagement_and_Monitoring_in_Reducing_Poverty.
20. Devarajan S., Khemani S., Walton M. Can civil society overcome government failure in Africa?. World Bank Research Observer 2014, 29(1):1-28.
21. Díaz-Cayeros A., Magaloni B., Ruiz-Euler A. Traditional governance, citizen engagement, and local public goods: Evidence from Mexico. World Development 2014, 53:80-93.
22. Dogbe, T., & Kwabena-Adade, J. (2012). Ghana: Budget monitoring by SEND-Ghana and its partners helps improve nutrition for children and support local farmers. International budget partnership, From Analysis to Impact, Study No. 9. Available at. http://internationalbudget.org/publications/ghana-budget-monitoring-by-send-ghana-and-its-partners-helps-improve-nutrition-for-children-and-support-local-farmers/.
23. Duflo, E., Dupas, P., & Kremer, M. (2012). School governance, teacher incentives, and pupil - Teacher ratios: Experimental evidence from Kenyan primary schools. NBER working paper 17939. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at. http://economics.mit.edu/files/7660.
24. Evans P. Government action, social capital and development: Reviewing the evidence on synergy. World Development 1996, 24(6):1119-1132.
25. Ferraz C., Finan F. Exposing corrupt politicians: The effects of Brazil's publicly released audits on electoral outcomes. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 2008, 123(2):703-745.
26. Fox J. The politics of food in Mexico: State power and social mobilization 1992, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
27. Fox J. How does civil society thicken? The political construction of social capital in rural Mexico. World Development 1996, 24(6):1089-1103.
28. Fox J. The World Bank and social capital: Contesting the concept in practice. Journal of International Development 1997, 9(7):963-971.
29. Fox J. Vertically integrated policy monitoring: A tool for civil society policy advocacy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 2001, 30(3):616-627.
30. Fox J. Empowerment and institutional change: Mapping 'Virtuous Circles' of state-society interaction. Power, rights and poverty: Concepts and connections 2004, 68-92. World Bank/GB Department of International Development, Washington. R. Alsop (Ed.).
31. Fox J. The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in Practice 2007, 17(4-5):663-671.
32. Fox J. Accountability politics: Power and voice in rural Mexico 2007, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
33. Fox J. State power and clientelism: Eight propositions for discussion. Clientelism in everyday Latin American politics 2012, 187-211. Palgrave, New York. T. Hilgers (Ed.).
34. Fox, J. (2014). Social accountability: What does the evidence really say? GPSA working paper, 1. Available at. http://gpsaknowledge.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Social-Accountability-What-Does-Evidence-Really-Say-GPSA-Working-Paper-1.pdf.
35. The struggle for accountability: The World Bank, NGOs and grassroots movements 1998, MIT Press. J. Fox, L.D. Brown (Eds.).
36. Fox J., Gershman J. The World Bank and social capital: Lessons from ten rural development projects in Mexico and the Philippines. Policy Sciences 2000, 33(3 & 4):399-419.
37. Friedman J. Expanding and diversifying Indonesia's Program for community empowerment, 2007-2012 2013, Innovations for Successful Societies, Princeton University.
38. Fung A., Graham M., Weil D. Full disclosure: The perils and promise of transparency 2007, Cambridge University Press, New York.
39. Gauri V. Redressing grievances and complaints regarding basic service delivery. World Development 2013, 41:109-119.
40. Courting social justice: Judicial enforcement of social and economic rights in the development world 2008, Cambridge University Press, New York. V. Gauri, D. Brinks (Eds.).
41. Gaventa J., Barrett G. Mapping the outcomes of citizen engagement. World Development 2012, 40(2):2399-2410.
42. Citizen action and national policy reform 2010, Zed, London. J. Gaventa, R. McGee (Eds.).
43. Gaventa J., McGee R. The impact of transparency and accountability initiatives. Development Policy Review 2013, 31(S1):s3-s28.
44. Gibson E. Boundary control: Subnational authoritarianism in democratic countries. World Politics 2005, 58(1):101-132.
45. Closing the feedback loop: Can technology close the accountability gap? 2014, World Bank, Washington. B.S. Gigler, S. Baijur (Eds.).
46. Giraudy A. Varieties of subnational undemocratic regimes: Evidence from Argentina and Mexico. Studies in Comparative International Development 2013, 48(1):51-80.
47. Goetz A., Jenkins B. Hybrid forms of accountability: Citizen engagement in institutions of public-sector oversight in India. Public Management Review 2001, 2(3):363-383.
48. Gonçalves S. The effects of participatory budgeting on municipal expenditures and infant mortality in Brazil. World Development 2014, 53:94-110.
49. Grandvoinnet H., Aslam G., Raha S. Opening the black box: Contextual drivers of social accountability effectiveness 2015, World Bank, Washington.
50. Griffin C., Ferranti D., Tolmie C. Lives in the balance: Improving accountability for public spending in developing countries 2010, Brookings, Washington.
51. Guerzovich, F., & Rosenzweig, S. (2013). Strategic dilemmas in changing contexts: G-watch's experience in the philippine education sector. Think Piece, Transparency and Accountability Initiative, April 10. Available at. http://www.transparency-initiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Strategic-Dilemmas-Context-FG-SR.pdf.
52. Guggenheim S. Crises and contradictions: Understanding the origins of a community development project in Indonesia. The search for empowerment: Social capital as idea and practice at the World Bank 2006, 111-144. Kumarian, Bloomfield, CT. A. Bebbington, M. Woolcock, S. Guggenheim, E.A. Olson (Eds.).
53. Heller P. Moving the state: The politics of democratic decentralization in Kerala, South Africa, and Porto Alegre. Politics and Society 2001, 29:131-163.
54. Heller P., Harilal K.N., Chaudhuri S. Building local democracy: Evaluating the impact of decentralization in Kerala, India. World Development 2007, 35(4):626-648.
55. Changing paths: International development and the new politics of inclusion 2003, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. P. Houtzager, M. Moore (Eds.).
56. Hubbard, P. (2007). Putting the power of transparency in context: Information's role in reducing corruption in Uganda's education sector. Working paper no. 136. Center for Global Development. Available at. http://www.cgdev.org/sites/default/files/15050_file_Uganda.pdf.
57. Isham J., Kahkonen S. Institutional determinants of the impact of community-based water services: Evidence from Sri Lanka and India. Economic Development and Cultural Change 2002, 50(3):667-691.
58. Isunza Vera E. Para analizar los procesos de democratización: Interfaces socioestatales, proyectos políticos y rendición de cuentas. Democratización, rendición de cuentas y sociedad civil: participación y control social 2006, 265-291. CIESAS/Universidad Veracruzana/Ed. Miguel Ángel Porrúa, Mexico City. E. Isunza Vera, A. Olvera (Eds.).
59. Democratización, rendición de cuentas y sociedad civil: participación y control social 2006, CIESAS/Universidad Veracruzana/Ed Miguel Ángel Porrúa, Mexico City. E. Isunza Vera, A. Olvera (Eds.).
60. Joshi A. Do they work? Assessing the impact of transparency and accountability initiatives in service delivery. Development Policy Review 2013, 31(s1):s29-s48.
61. Joshi A. Reading the local context: A causal chain approach to social accountability. IDS Bulletin 2014, 45(5):23-35.
62. Joshi A., Houtzager P. Widgets or watchdogs?. Public Management Review 2012, 14(2):145-162.
63. Keefer, P., & Khemani, S. (2012). Do informed citizens receive more. .or pay more? The impact of radio on the government distribution of public health benefits. World Bank Policy research working paper, 5952. Available at. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/3236.
64. Kosack S., Fung A. Does transparency improve governance?. Annual Review of Political Science 2014, 17:65-87.
65. Krishna A., Uphoff N. Mapping and measuring social capital through assessment of collective action to conserve and develop watersheds in Rajasthan, India. The role of social capital in development: An empirical assessment 2002, 85-124. Cambridge University Press, New York. C. Grootaert, T. van Bastelaer (Eds.).
66. Lieberman E., Posner D., Tsai L. Does information lead to more active citizenship? Evidence from an education intervention in rural Kenya. World Development 2014, 60:69-83.
67. Lipsky M. Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services 1980, Russell Sage, New York.
68. Loewenstein G., Sunstein C.R., Golman R. Disclosure: Psychology changes everything. Annual Review of Economics 2014, 6:391-419.
69. Long N. A perspective on the sociology of development. Sociologia Ruralis 1984, 24(3-4):168-184.
70. Democratic accountability in Latin America 2003, Oxford University Press, Oxford. S. Mainwaring, C. Welna (Eds.).
71. Maiorano D. The politics of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act in Andhra Pradesh. World Development 2014, 58:95-105.
72. Mansuri G., Rao V. Localizing Development: Does participation work? 2013, World Bank, Washington, DC.
73. Maru V. Allies unknown: Social accountability and legal empowerment. Health and Human Rights 2010, 12(1):83-93.
74. Mejía Acosta A. The impact and effectiveness of accountability and transparency initiatives: The governance of natural resources. Development Policy Review 2013, 31(S1):s89-s105.
75. Moreno E., Crisp B., Shugart M.S. The accountability deficit in Latin America. Democratic accountability in Latin America 2003, 79-131. Oxford University Press, Oxford. S. Mainwaring, C. Welna (Eds.).
76. Narayan D. The contribution of people's participation: Evidence from 121 rural water supply projects. Environmentally sustainable development occasional paper series, 1 1995, World Bank.
77. O'Donnell G. Horizontal accountability in new democracies. Journal of Democracy 1998, 9(3):1112-1126.
78. O'Meally S.C. Mapping context for social accountability. Social development resource paper 2013, World Bank, Washington, DC.
79. O'Donnell G. On the state, democratization and some conceptual problems: A Latin American view with glances at some postcommunist countries. World Development 1993, 21(8):1355-1369.
80. Olken B. Monitoring corruption: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. Journal of Political Economy 2007, 115(2):200-249.
81. Olken B. Corruption perceptions vs. corruption reality. Journal of Public Economics 2009, 93(7-8):950-964.
82. Ostrom E. Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development 1996, 24(6):1073-1087.
83. Pande, S. (2014). The right to know, the right to live: Grassroots struggle for information and work in India (Ph.D. dissertation). Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.
84. Pande, S. (2015). Dying for information: Right to information and whistleblower protection in India. U4 Brief, 3. Available at. http://www.u4.no/publications/dying-for-information-right-to-information-and-whistleblower-protection-in-india/.
85. Pandey, P., Goyal, S., & Sundararaman, V. (2008). Community participation in public schools: The impact of information campaigns in three Indian states. World Bank policy research working paper series, 4776. Impact evaluation series no. 26. Available at. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/6359.
86. Paul S. Accountability in public services: Exit, voice and control. World Development 1992, 20(7):1047-1060.
87. Paul S. Public spending, outcomes and accountability: Citizen report card as a catalyst for public action. Economic and Political Weekly 2006, 41(4):333-340.
88. Peisakhin L., Pinto P. Is transparency an effective anti-corruption strategy? Evidence from a field experiment in India. Regulation and Governance 2010, 4:261-280.
89. Enforcing the rule of law: Social accountability in the new Latin American democracies 2006, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh. E. Peruzzotti, C. Smulovitz (Eds.).
90. Platteau J.P., Gaspart F. The risk of resource misappropriation in community-driven development. World Development 2003, 31(10):1687-1703.
91. PNPM rural impact evaluation 2012 2012, PNPM, PNPM Support Facility, Jakarta.
92. Pogrebinschi T., Samuels D. The impact of participatory democracy: Evidence from Brazil's national public policy conferences. Comparative Politics 2014, 46(3):313-332.
93. Pradhan, M., Suryadarma, D., Beatty, A., Wong, M., Alishjabana, A., Gaduh, A., et al. (2011). Improving educational quality through enhancing community participation: Results from a randomised field experiment in Indonesia. World Bank policy research working paper, no. 5795.
94. Democracy, accountability and representation 1999, Cambridge University Press. A. Przeworski, S. Stokes, B. Manin (Eds.).
95. Ravallion, M., van de Walle, D., Dutta, P., & Murgai, R. (2013). Testing information constraints on India's largest antipoverty program. World Bank policy research working paper, no. 6598.
96. Reinikka R., Svensson J. The power of information: Evidence from a newspaper campaign to reduce capture. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2004, 119(2):678-704.
97. Reinikka R., Svennson J. The power of information in public services: Evidence from education in Uganda. Journal of Public Economics 2011, 95:956-966.
98. Ribot J. Democratic decentralization of natural resources: Institutionalizing popular participation 2002, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
99. Democratic decentralisation through a natural resource lens: Cases from Africa, Asia and Latin America 2005, Routledge, New York. J. Ribot, A. Larson (Eds.).
100. Sartori G. Concept misinformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review 1970, 64(4).
101. Schedler A. Conceptualizing accountability. The self-restraining state: Power and accountability in new democracies 1999, 13-28. Lynne Reinner, Boulder. A. Schedler, L. Diamond, M.F. Plattner (Eds.).
102. Schommer, P. C., Calvalho Rocha, A., Spaniol, E. L. & Dahmer, J. (2013). Accountability and the co-production of information as a public good: Conceptual interaction and evidence in Brazilian public administration. Presented at the XVII international research society on public management, IRSPM conference, Prague.
103. Shankar, S. (2010). Can social audits count? ASARC working paper. New Delhi. Available at. https://crawford.anu.edu.au/acde/asarc/pdf/papers/2010/WP2010_09.pdf.
104. Snyder R. Scaling down: the subnational comparative method. Studies in Comparative International Development 2001, 36(1).
105. Tarrow S. Dynamics of diffusion: Mechanisms, institutions and scale shift. The diffusion of social movements: Actors, mechanisms, and political effects 2010, 204-220. Cambridge University Press, New York. R. Kolins Givan, K.M. Roberts, S.A. Soule (Eds.).
106. Tembo F. Rethinking social accountability in Africa: Lessons from the Mwananchi Programme 2013, Overseas Development Institute, London.
107. Tendler J. Good government in the tropics 1997, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
108. Touchton M., Wampler B. Improving social well-being through new democratic institutions. Comparative Political Studies 2014, 47(10):1442-1469.
109. Uphoff N., Wijayaratna C.M. Demonstrated benefits from social capital: The productivity of farmer organizations in Gal Oya, Sri Lanka. World Development 2000, 28(11):1875-1890.
110. World development report 2004: Making services work for poor people 2003, World Bank, World Bank/Oxford University Press, Washington, DC.
111. Woolcock M. Using case studies to explore the external validity of 'complex' development interventions. Evaluation 2013, 19(3):229-248.
112. Zimmerman, B. (2014). Transparency, sanctioning capacity, and corruption displacement: multi-method evidence from local government in Malawi (Ph.D. dissertation). University of California, San Diego, Political Science Dept.