Is transparency an effective anti-corruption strategy? Evidence from a field experiment in India

Regulation and Governance

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 261-280

  Peisakhin, Leonid ^a   Pinto, Paul ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Corruption; Field experiment; Freedom of information; India; Public goods; Transparency

Indexed keywords

EID: 77957131922     PISSN: 17485983     EISSN: 17485991     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01081.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Angrist J, Imbens G, Rubin D. Identification of Causal Effects and Instrumental Variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1996, 91:444-455.
2. Bardhan P. The Economist's Approach to the Problem of Corruption. World Development 2006, 34:341-348.
3. Becker G, Stigler G. Law Enforcement, Malfeasance, and Compensation of Enforcers. Journal of Legal Studies 1974, 3:1-18.
4. Bertrand M, Djankov S, Hanna R, Mullainathan S. Does Corruption Produce Unsafe Drivers? 2006, NBER Working Paper 12274. Cambridge, MA
5. Das S. Public Office, Private Interest: Bureaucracy and Corruption in India 2001, Oxford University Press, New Delhi
6. Action Research Villages: A Right to Information Campaign 2007, Development Alternatives, Development Alternatives, New Delhi
7. Di Tella R, Schargrodsky E. The Role of Wages and Auditing during a Crackdown on Corruption in the City of Buenos Aires. Journal of Law and Economics 2003, 46:269-292.
8. Gentzkow M, Glaeser E, Goldin C. The Rise of the Fourth Estate: How Newspapers Became Informative and Why It Mattered. Corruption and Reform: Lessons from America's Economic History 2006, 187-230. Glaeser E, Goldin C, eds, NBER and Chicago University Press, Cambridge, MA and Chicago, IL
9. CIC Annual Report 2005-6. 2006, http://cic.gov.in/AnnualReports/AR2005-06.pdf, Government of India Central Information Commission, Last accessed 1 Feb 2010.] Available from URL:
10. 2007, http://planningcommission.nic.in/reports/repgen.html, Government of India Planning Commission, [Last accessed 1 February 2010.] Available from URL:
11. Condition of Urban Slums 2002: Salient Features. 2002, http://www.domain-b.com/economy/general/2005/pdf/Urban_Slums.pdf, Government of India National Sample Survey Organization, Report No. 486 (58/0.21/1). [Last accessed 1 February 2010.] Available from URL:
12. Jenkins R, Goetz A. Accounts and Accountability: Theoretical Implications of the Right-to-Information Movement in India. Third World Quarterly 1999, 20:603-622.
13. Jenkins R, Goetz A. Civil Society Engagement and India's Public Distribution System: Lessons from the Rationing Kruti Samiti in Mumbai. 2002, http://www.righttofoodindia.org/data/jenkins-goetz2002civil-society-engagement-pds.pdf, Prepared for the World Development Report 2004 Workshop. [Last accessed 11 August 2010.] Available from URL:
14. Jha S, Rao V, Woolcock M. Governance in the Gullies: Democratic Responsiveness and Leadership in Delhi's Slums. 2005, http://econ.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64165259&piPK=64165421&theSitePK=469372&menuPK=64216926&entityID=000016406-20050824161000, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3694. [Last accessed 2 May 2010.] Available from URL:
15. Kaufmann D, Mehrez G, Gurgur T. Voice or Public Sector Management? An Empirical Investigation of Determinants of Public Sector Performance Based on a Survey of Public Officials. 2002, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=316865, World Bank Research Working Paper. World Bank and IMF, Washington, DC. [Last accessed 4 June 2010.] Available from URL:
16. Khan M. Patron-client Networks and the Economic Effects of Corruption in Asia. Corruption: Concepts and Contexts 2002, 467-488. Heidenheimer AJohnston M. eds, 3rd, edn, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ
17. Morton R, Williams K. From Nature to the Lab: The Methodology of Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality 2009, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY
18. Nye J. Corruption and Political Development: A Cost-Benefit Analysis. Political Corruption: Concepts and Contexts 2001, 281-300. Heidenheimer AJohnston M. eds, pp, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ
19. Peisakhin L. Does Greater Government Transparency Help the Poor to access Public Goods? Evidence from Field-Experiments in India. 2010, Working Paper, Yale University, New Haven, CT
20. Final Report: Understanding the " Key Issues and Constraints" in Implementing the RTI Act. 2009, http://rti.gov.in/rticorner/studybypwc/Executive%20Summary.pdf, PricewaterhouseCoopers, Commissioned by the Government of India, Department of Personnel and Training. [Last accessed 2 Feb 2010.] Available from URL:
21. State of Information Commissioners in India - A Performance Evaluation. 2010, http://www.rtiawards.org/images/final_report.pdf, Public Cause Research Foundation, Last accessed 13 August 2010.] Available from URL:
22. Reinikka R, Svensson J. Local Capture: Evidence from a Central Government Transfer Program in Uganda. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2004, 119:679-705.
23. Rose-Ackerman S. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform 1999, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY
24. Rose-Ackerman S. Governance and Corruption. Global Crises, Global Solutions 2004, 301-338. Lomborg B. ed, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
25. Singh G. Understanding Political Corruption in Indian Politics. Political Studies 1997, 45:626-638.
26. Corruption Perceptions Index. 2009, http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi/2009, Transparency International, Last accessed 5 Feb 2010.] Available from URL:
27. Treisman D. What have We Learned about the Causes of Corruption from Ten Years of Cross-national Empirical Research? Annual Review of Political Science 2007, 10:211-244.
28. Wade R. The Market for Public Office: Why the Indian State is not Better at Development. World Development 1985, 13:467-495.