Mapping prosody and syntax as Discourse Strategies: How basic discourse units vary across genres

Where Prosody Meets Pragmatics

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 79-105

  Degand, Liesbeth ^a   Simon, Anne Catherine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928060319     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1163/9789004253223_005     Document Type: Chapter

References (68)

1. Askehave, I. and J. Swales (2001). ''Genre identification and communicative purpose: A problem and a possible solution''. Applied Linguistics 22 (2): 195-212.
2. Auchlin, A. (to appear). ''Du phonostyle à l'éthos, les prosodies comme interfaces entre sens et corps. Pour repenser l'acte de langage à partir de l'activité de parole'', in Actes du 3ème Symposium International sur l'Analyse du Discours, Belo Horizonte, avril 2008.
3. Auchlin, A. and A. Ferrari. (1994). ''Structuration prosodique, syntaxe, discours: Évidences et problèmes''. Cahiers de linguistique franc-aise 15: 187-217.
4. Auer, P., E. Couper-Kuhlen and F. Müller (1999). Language in time. The rhythm and tempo of spoken interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Berrendonner, A. (1990). ''Pour une macro-syntaxe''. Travaux de Linguistique 21: 25-36.
6. Berrendonner, A. (2002). ''Les deux syntaxes''. Verbum 24 (1-2): 23-36.
7. Bilger, M. and E. Campione. (2002). ''Propositions pour un étiquetage en 'séquences fonctionnelles''. Recherches sur le Franc-ais Parlé 17: 117-136.
8. Blanche-Benveniste, C. (2002a). ''Macro-syntaxe et micro-syntaxe: les dispositifs de la rection verbale'', in H. Andersen and H. Nølke (eds.), Macro-Syntaxe et Macro-Sémantique. Actes du Colloque International d'Å rhus, 17-19 mai 2001, Peter Lang, Frankfurt/Bern, 95-118.
9. Blanche-Benveniste, C. (2002). ''Phrase et construction verbale''. Verbum 24 (1-2): 7-22.
10. Blanche-Benveniste, C., M. Bilger, Ch. Rouget, K. van den Eynde and P. Mertens (1990). Le Franc- ais Parlé: Etudes Grammaticales, Éditions du CNRS, Paris.
11. Boersma, P. and D. Weenink (2008). ''Praat: doing phonetics by computer'' (Version 5.1). Available at: http://www.praat.org/
12. Campione, E. (2001). Etiquetage prosodique semi-automatique de corpus oraux: algorithmes et méthodologie. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Provence, available at: http://sites.univ-provence.fr/delic/perso/campione/index.html
13. Chafe, W. L. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14. Couper-Kuhlen, E. and T. Ono (2007). ''Incrementing in conversation. A comparison of practices in English, German and Japanese''. Pragmatics (Special issue: Turn continuation in cross-linguistic perspective) 17 (4): 513-552.
15. Degand, L. and A. C. Simon (2005). ''Minimal discourse units: Can we define them, and why should we?'', in M. Aurnague, M. Bras, A. Le Draoulec and L. Vieu (eds.), Proceedings of SEM-05. Connectors, discourse framing and discourse structure: From corpus-based and experimental analyses to discourse theories. Biarritz, 14-15 November 2005, 65-74.
16. Degand, L. and A. C. Simon (2008). ''Minimal discourse units in spoken French: Uncovering genre-bound segmentation strategies'', in W. Ramm and C. Fabricius-Hansen (eds.), Linearisation and segmentation in discourse. Lysebu, Oslo: Department of Literature, Area Studies and European Languages, University of Oslo, 31-42. http://www.hf.uio.no/ilos/forskning/konferanser/mad08/proceedings.html
17. Degand, L. and A. C. Simon (2009). ''Minimal discourse units in spoken French: On the role of syntactic and prosodic units in discourse segmentation''. Discours 4. http://discours.revues.org/index.html
18. Delattre, P. (1966). ''Les dix intonations de base du franc- ais''. French Review 40 (1): 1-14.
19. Delais-Roussarie, E. and B. Post (2008). ''Unités prosodiques et grammaire de l'intonation: vers une nouvelle approche'', Journées d'Études de la Parole 2008, available at: http://www.afcp-parole.org/doc/Archives_JEP/2008_XVII_JEP_Avignon/PDF/avignon2008_pdf/JEP/077_jep_1565.pdf
20. Deulofeu, J. (2003). ''L'approche macrosyntaxique en syntaxe: un nouveau modèle de rasoir d'Occam contre les notions inutiles''. Scolia 16: 77-95.
21. Di Cristo, A. and D. Hirst (1996). ''Vers une typologie des unités intonatives du franc- ais'', in Proceedings of XXI J.E.P, Avignon 1996, 219-222.
22. Dister, A., M. Francard, Ph. Hambye and A. C. Simon (2009). ''Du corpus à la banque de données. Du son, des textes et des métadonnées. L'évolution de banque de données textuelles orales VALIBEL (1989-2009)''. Cahiers de Linguistique 33 (2): 113-129.
23. Duez, D. (2001). ''Signification des hésitations dans la production et la perception de la parole spontanée''. Revue PArole 17-18-19: 113-137.
24. Erman, B. (2001). ''Pragmatic markers revisited with a focus on you know in adult and adolescent talk''. Journal of Pragmatics 33 (9): 1337-1359.
25. Esser, J. (1998). ''Syntactic and prosodic closure in on-line speech production''. Anglia 116 (4): 479-491.
26. Goldman, J. (2008). ''EasyAlign: A semi-automatic phonetic alignment tool under Praat'', available at: http://latlcui.unige.ch/phonetique/easyalign (9 October 2008).
27. Grosz, B. J. and C. L. Sidner (1986). ''Attention, intentions and the structure of discourse''. Computational Linguistics Journal 12 (3): 175-204.
28. Gumperz, J. (2001). ''Inference'', in A. Duranti (ed.), Keyterms in language and culture. Oxford: Blackwell, 126-128.
29. Halford, B. (1996). Talk units: The structure of spoken Canadian English. Tübingen: Narr.
30. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
31. Hannay, M. and C. Kroon (2005). ''Acts and the relationship between discourse and grammar''. Functions of Language 12 (1): 87-124.
32. Hirschberg, J. (2000). ''Corpus-based approach for speaking styles'', in M. Horne, (ed.), Prosody: Theory and experiment. Studies Presented to Gösta Bruce, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 335-350.
33. Hobbs, J. R. (1985). On the coherence and structure of discourse, Report No. CSLI-85-37, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, available at: http://www.isi.edu/Bhobbs/ocsd.pdf (26 August 2009).
34. Hutchby, I. and R. Wooffitt (1998). Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
35. Jun, S. and C. Fougeron (2000). ''A phonological model of French intonation'', in A. Botinis (ed.), Intonation: Analysis, modelling and technology. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 185-208.
36. Kawaguchi, P. Y., I. Fonagy and T. Moriguchi (eds.) (2006). Prosody and syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
37. Koch, P. and W. Oesterreicher (2001). ''Langage parlé et langage écrit'', in G. Holtus, M. Metzeltin and C. Schmitt (eds.), Lexikon der romanistischen Linguistik (LRL). Tübingen: Niemeyer, 584-627.
38. Lacheret-Dujour, A. and F. Beaugendre (1999). La Prosodie du Franc-ais. Paris: Editions du CNRS.
39. Lacheret-Dujour, A. and B. Victorri (2002). ''La période intonative comme unité d'analyse du franc- ais parlé: modélisation prosodique et enjeux linguistiques''. Verbum 24 (1-2): 55-72.
40. Mann, W. C. and S. A. Thompson. (1988). ''Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization''. Text 8: 243-281.
41. Martin, J. R. (1985). ''Process and text: Two aspects of human semiosis'', in J. D. Benson and W. S. Greave (eds.), Systemic perspectives on discourse Vol. 1. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 248-274.
42. Martin, J. R. (1997). ''Analysing genre: Functional parameters'', in F. Christie and J. R. Martin (eds.), Genres and institutions. London: Cassell, 3-39.
43. Mertens, P. (1993). ''Intonational grouping, boundaries and syntactic structure in French'', in Proceedings of ESCA Workshop on Prosody, September 27-29, Lund Working Papers 41, 156-159.
44. Mertens, P. (2006). ''A predictive approach to the analysis of intonation in discourse in French'', in P. Y. Kawaguchi, I. Fonagy and T. Moriguchi (eds.), Prosody and syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 64-101.
45. Mertens, P. (2008). ''Syntaxe, prosodie et structure informationnelle: une approche prédictive pour l'analyse de l'intonation dans le discourse''. Travaux de Linguistique 56 (1): 87-124.
46. Mertens, P. and A. C. Simon (2009). ''Automatic detection of prosodic boundaries in spoken French'', Ms., Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and Université catholique de Louvain (Louvain-la-Neuve).
47. Miller, C. R. (1984). ''Genre as social action''. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151-167.
48. Moneglia, M. and E. Cresti (eds.) (2005). C-ORAL-ROM: Integrated reference corpora for spoken romance language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
49. Polanyi, L. (1988). ''A formal model of the structure of discourse''. Journal of Pragmatics 12 (5-6): 601-638.
50. Post, B. (2000). Tonal and phrasal structures in French intonation. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
51. Rossari, C. (1996). ''Identification d'unités discursives: Les actes et les connecteurs''. Cahiers de Linguistique Franc-aise 18: 157-177.
52. Rossi, M. (1999). L'Intonation, le Système du Franc-ais: Description et Modélisation. Paris: Ophrys.
53. Roulet, E. (2002). ''Le problème de la définition des unités à la frontière entre le syntaxique et le textual''. Verbum 24 (1-2): 161-178.
54. Roulet, P., L. Filliettaz, A. Grobet and M. Burger (2001). Un Modèle et un Instrument d'Analyse de l'Organisation du Discours. Bern: Peter Lang.
55. Sanders, T. (1997). ''Semantic and pragmatic sources of coherence: On the categorization of coherence relations in context''. Discourse Processes 24 (1): 119-147.
56. Sanders, T. and W. Spooren (2007). ''Discourse and text structure'', in D. Geeraerts and H. Cuykens (eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 916-943.
57. Schegloff, E. A. (1996). ''Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction'', in E. Ochs, E. A. Schegloff and S. A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 52-133.
58. Selting, M. (2000). ''The construction of units in conversational talk''. Language in Society 29 (4): 477-517.
59. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (2000). ''Phrase level phonology in speech production planning: Evidence for the role of prosodic structure'', in M. Horne (ed.), Prosody: Theory and experiment. Studies Presented to Gösta Bruce, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 201-230.
60. Shiffrin, R. M. and W. Schneider (1977). ''Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory''. Psychological Review 84 (2): 127-190.
61. Simon, A. C. (2004). La Structuration Prosodique du Discours en Franc-ais. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
62. Simon, A. C., A. Auchlin, M. Avanzi and J.-Ph. Goldman (in press), ''Les phonostyles: une description prosodique des styles de parole en franc- ais'', in M. Abecassis and G. Ledegen (eds.), Les voix des Franc-ais. En parlant, en écrivant. Berne: Peter Lang.
63. Simon, A. C., M. Avanzi and J. Goldman (2008). ''La détection des proéminences syllabiques. Un aller-retour entre l'annotation manuelle et le traitement automatique'', in J. Durand, B. Habert and B. Laks (eds.), Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Franc-aise. Paris: Institut de Linguistique Franc- aise. [available online at: http://www.linguistiquefrancaise.org/index.php?option 1/4 article&access 1/4 standard&Itemid 1/4 129&url 1/4 /articles/cmlf/pdf/2008/01/cmlf08256.pdf].
64. Steen, G. (2005). ''Basic discourse acts: Towards a psychological theory of discourse segmentation'', in F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez and M. S. Peña Cervel (eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 283-312.
65. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66. Taboada, M. (2006). ''Discourse markers as signals (or not) of rhetorical relations''. Journal of Pragmatics 38 (4): 567-592.
67. Taboada, M. and W. C. Mann (2006). ''Rhetorical structure theory: Looking back and moving ahead''. Discourse Studies 8 (3): 423-459.
68. Van Dijk, T. (1997). ''Cognitive context models and discourse'', in M. Stamenov (ed.), Language structure, discourse and the access to consciousness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 189-226.