Addressing reproductive health disparities as a healthcare management priority: Pursuing equity in the era of the Affordable Care Act

Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 531-538

  Mehta, Pooja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Disparities; Health reform; Reproductive health

Indexed keywords

ETHNIC DIFFERENCE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH DISPARITY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; LAW; MATERNAL MORTALITY; MATERNAL WELFARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACE DIFFERENCE; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; REVIEW; SOCIAL STATUS; UNPLANNED PREGNANCY; ECONOMICS; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DISPARITY; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SERVICE; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; MINORITY HEALTH; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; SOCIOECONOMICS; TRENDS; UNITED STATES;

FEMALE; HEALTH CARE REFORM; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HEALTH STATUS DISPARITIES; HEALTHCARE DISPARITIES; HUMANS; MATERNAL MORTALITY; MINORITY HEALTH; PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, UNPLANNED; PRENATAL CARE; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84928014928     PISSN: 1040872X     EISSN: 1473656X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000119     Document Type: Review

References (86)

1. Braveman P. Health disparities and health equity: concepts and measurement. Annu Rev Public Health 2006; 27:167-194.
2. Dehlendorf C, Bryant AS, Huddleston HG, et al. Health disparities: definitions and measurements. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202:212-213.
3. Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR, editors. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2003.
4. Ma IW, Khan NA, Kang A, et al. Systematic review identified suboptimal reporting and use of race/ethnicity in general medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60:572-578.
5. Health People 2020 Health Policy Blueprint. US Department of Health and Human Services: Foundation Health Measures; 2010.
6. Conron KJ, Landers SJ, Reisner SL, Sell RL. Sex and gender in the US health surveillance system: a call to action. Am J Public Health 2014; 104:970-976.
7. Williams DR. Race and health: basic questions, emerging directions. Ann Epidemiol 1997; 7:322-333.
8. Krieger N. Does racism harm health? Did child abuse exist before 1962? On explicit questions, critical science, and current controversies: an ecosocial perspective. Am J Public Health 2008; 98 (Suppl 9):S20-S25.
9. Bryant AS, Worjoloh A, Caughey AB, Washington AE. Racial/ethnic disparities in obstetric outcomes and care: prevalence and determinants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202:335-343.
10. Dehlendorf C, Harris LH, Weitz TA. Disparities in abortion rates: a public health approach. Am J Public Health 2013; 103:1772-1779. This is a thoughtful review from national experts covering recent data on abortion disparities, a summary of most likely causes of these disparities, and an argument for a multifaceted public health approach to addressing them.
11. Braveman P, Gottlieb L. The social determinants of health: it's time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Rep 2014; 129 (Suppl 2):19-31.
12. Asch DA, Armstrong K. Aggregating and partitioning populations in healthcare disparities research: differences in perspective. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:2117-2121.
13. Creanga AA, Berg CJ, Ko JY, et al. Maternal mortality andmorbidity in the United States: where are we now? J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2014; 23:3-9. A brief overview of the work conducted by the Division of Reproductive Health at the CDC on severe maternal morbidity and mortality, including specific discussion of CDC efforts to prioritize addressing of maternal substance abuse and mental health disorders during pregnancy.
14. Callaghan WM. Overview of maternal mortality in the United States. Semin Perinatol 2012; 36:2-6.
15. Creanga AA, Bateman BT, Kuklina EV, Callaghan WM. Racial and ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity: a multistate analysis, 2008-2010. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210:435.e1-435.e8. This article represents the most recent data on severe maternal morbidity from the CDC. State Inpatient Database data are used to demonstrate that non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander, and American Indian/Alaska Native women had 2.1, 1.3, 1.2, and 1.7 times (all P < 0.05), respectively, higher rates of severe morbidity compared with non-Hispanic White women. Severe maternal morbidity is recommended as a key reproductive health indicator to be measured at facility, state, and national levels in order to guide creation and evaluation of interventions to address disparities.
16. Howell EA, Zeitlin J, Hebert P, et al. Paradoxical trends and racial differences in obstetric quality and neonatal and maternal mortality. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121:1201-1208. In this key analysis, National Inpatient Sample data were used to demonstrate national improvement over a 10-year period in agency-sponsored obstetric quality indicators in both Black and White women. Despite this improvement, inpatient maternal and neonatal mortality and racial disparities in mortality remained constant over the same period of time.
17. Callaghan WM. Geographic variation of reproductive health indicators and outcomes in the United States: place matters. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211:278-284. This article demonstrates how reproductive health indicators and conditions relevant to obstetricians and gynecologists vary across states and regions in the United States as well as within regions and states because of the intersection of place, the social determinants of health, and policy. Online data resources for use in examining geographic variation are provided.
18. Kramer MR, Hogue CR. Place matters: variation in the black/white very preterm birth rate across U.S. metropolitan areas, 2002-2004. Public Health Rep 2008; 123:576-585.
19. Vang ZM, Elo IT. Exploring the health consequences of majority-minority neighborhoods: minority diversity and birthweight among native-born and foreign-born blacks. Soc Sci Med 2013; 97:56-65.
20. Creanga AA, Bateman BT, Mhyre JM, et al. Performance of racial and ethnic minority-serving hospitals on delivery-related indicators. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014. Secondary analysis using State Inpatient Database and American Hospital Association data to examine how racial/ethnic minority-serving hospitals perform on 15 delivery-related indicators, and examine whether indicators vary by race/ethnicity within the same type of hospitals. These data are of relevance as the ACA shifts the financial resources available to minority-serving hospitals.
21. US Census Bureau. Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2007, in Current Population Reports. Washington DC; 2009.
22. Bengiamin MI, Capitman JA, Ruwe MB. Disparities in initiation and adherence to prenatal care: impact of insurance, race-ethnicity and nativity. Matern Child Health J 2010; 14:618-624.
23. Kogan MD, Kotelchuck M, Alexander GR, Johnson WE. Racial disparities in reported prenatal care advice from healthcare providers. Am J Public Health 1994; 84:82-88.
24. Coley SL, Aronson RE. Exploring birth outcome disparities and the impact of prenatal care utilization among North Carolina teen mothers. Womens Health Issues 2013; 23:e287-e294.
25. Catov JM, Flint M, Lee M, et al. The relationship between race, inflammation and psychosocial factors among pregnant women. Matern Child Health J 2014.
26. Quispel C, Lambregtse-van den Berg MP, Steegers EA, et al. Contribution of psychopathology, psychosocial problems and substance use to urban and rural differences in birth outcomes. Eur J Public Health 2014.
27. Wallace M, Harville E, Theall K, et al. Neighborhood poverty, allostatic load, and birth outcomes in African American and white women: findings from the Bogalusa Heart Study. Health Place 2013; 24:260-266.
28. Wallace M, Harville E, Theall K, et al. Preconception biomarkers of allostatic load and racial disparities in adverse birth outcomes: the Bogalusa Heart Study. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2013; 27:587-597.
29. Wallace ME, Harville EW. Allostatic load and birth outcomes among white and black women in New Orleans. Matern Child Health J 2013; 17:1025-1029.
30. Rosenberg L, Palmer JR, Wise LA, et al. Perceptions of racial discrimination and the risk of preterm birth. Epidemiology 2002; 13:646-652.
31. Reagan PB, Salsberry PJ. Race and ethnic differences in determinants of preterm birth in the USA: broadening the social context. Soc Sci Med 2005; 60:2217-2228.
32. Osypuk TL, Acevedo-Garcia D. Are racial disparities in preterm birth larger in hypersegregated areas? Am J Epidemiol 2008; 167:1295-1304.
33. Mustillo S, Krieger N, Gunderson EP, et al. Self-reported experiences of racial discrimination and Black-White differences in preterm and low-birthweight deliveries: the CARDIA Study. Am J Public Health 2004; 94:2125-2131.
34. Collins JW Jr, David RJ, Handler A, et al. Very low birthweight in African American infants: the role of maternal exposure to interpersonal racial discrimination. Am J Public Health 2004; 94:2132-2138.
35. Lu MC, Chen B. Racial and ethnic disparities in preterm birth: the role of stressful life events. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191:691-699.
36. Messer LC, Vinikoor LC, Laraia BA, et al. Socioeconomic domains and associations with preterm birth. Soc Sci Med 2008; 67:1247-1257.
37. Bell JF, Zimmerman FJ, Almgren GR, et al. Birth outcomes among urban African-American women: a multilevel analysis of the role of racial residential segregation. Soc Sci Med 2006; 63:3030-3045.
38. Zambrana RE, Scrimshaw SC, Collins N, Dunkel-Schetter C. Prenatal health behaviors and psychosocial risk factors in pregnant women of Mexican origin: the role of acculturation. Am J Public Health 1997; 87:1022-1026.
39. Ruiz RJ, Saade GR, Brown CE, et al. The effect of acculturation on progesterone/ estriol ratios and preterm birth in Hispanics. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 111 (2 Pt 1):309-316.
40. Ruiz RJ, Dolbier CL, Fleschler R. The relationships among acculturation, biobehavioral risk, stress, corticotropin-releasing hormone, and poor birth outcomes in Hispanic women. Ethn Dis 2006; 16:926-932.
41. Rosenberg TJ, Raggio TP, Chiasson MA. A further examination of the 'epidemiologic paradox': birth outcomes among Latinas. J Natl Med Assoc 2005; 97:550-556.
42. von Ehrenstein OS, Wilhelm M, Wang A, Ritz B. Preterm birth and prenatal maternal occupation: the role of Hispanic ethnicity and nativity in a populationbased sample in Los Angeles, California. Am J Public Health 2014; 104 (Suppl 1):S65-S72.
43. Xiong X, Pridjian G, Dickey RP. Racial and ethnic disparities in preterm births in infants conceived by in vitro fertilization in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209:128.e1-128.e6.
44. Tucker MJ, Berg CJ, Callaghan WM, Hsia J. The Black-White disparity in pregnancy-related mortality from 5 conditions: differences in prevalence and case-fatality rates. Am J Public Health 2007; 97:247-251.
45. SpongCY,Iams J,Goldenberg R, et al. Disparities inperinatalmedicine: preterm birth, stillbirth, and infant mortality. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117:948-955.
46. Dehlendorf C, Rodriguez MI, Levy K, et al. Disparities in family planning. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 202:214-220.
47. Stern AM. Sterilized in the name of public health: race, immigration, and reproductive control inmodernCalifornia.AmJ Public Health 2005; 95:1128-1138.
48. Shapiro TM, Fisher W, Diana A. Family planning and female sterilization in the United States. Soc Sci Med 1983; 17:1847-1855.
49. Roberts D. The pill at 40: a new look at a familiar method. Black women and the pill. Fam Plann Perspect 2000; 32:92-93.
50. Thorburn S, Bogart LM. African American women and family planning services: perceptions of discrimination. Women Health 2005; 42:23-39.
51. Borrero S, Schwarz EB, Creinin M, Ibrahim S. The impact of race and ethnicity on receipt of family planning services in the United States. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2009; 18:91-96.
52. Finer LB, Zolna MR.Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001-2008. Am J Public Health 2014; 104 (Suppl 1):S43-S48. This article summarizes the most up-to-date and rigorously calculated data on unintended pregnancy rate. In 2008, 51% of pregnancies in the United States were unintended. Between 2001 and 2008, intended pregnancies decreased and unintended pregnancies increased (a shift not observed previously), with fewer unintended pregnancies ending in abortion. Large disparities in unintended pregnancy by relationship status, income, and education increased.
53. Masinter LM, Feinglass J, Simon MA. Pregnancy intention and use of contraception among Hispanic women in the United States: data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 2006-2010. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2013; 22:862-870. Analysis of 2006-2010 National Survey of Family Growth data examining fertility, contraception use, and unintended pregnancy in Latina women. Seventy percent of Hispanic women reported ever having been pregnant, with a 51% unintended pregnancy rate overall and an 81% unintended pregnancy rate in teenagers, with additionally high rates in multigravidas. Half of unintended pregnancies were preceded by no contraception. The most common reason for unintended pregnancy preceded by contraception was 'improper use' (45%).
54. Dehlendorf C, Park SY, Emeremni CA, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in contraceptive use: variation by age and women's reproductive experiences. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210:526.e1-526.e9. This is the most recent data with the largest available sample examining the association between race/ethnicity and contraceptive use. Compared with Whites, Blacks were less likely to use any method [adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 0.65]; Blacks and Hispanics were less likely to use a highly or moderately effective method (AOR, 0.49 and 0.57, respectively). Interaction analyses revealed that younger women had more prominent disparities. These data complement prior NSFG analysis showing that Black and Hispanic women are more likely to use sterilization as a contraceptive method than White women.
55. Craig AD, Dehlendorf C, Borrero S, et al. Exploring young adults' contraceptive knowledge and attitudes: disparities by race/ethnicity and age. Womens Health Issues 2014; 24:e281-e289. Secondary analysis of the National Survey of Reproductive and Contraceptive Knowledge, showing that teenagers and Hispanics had lower awareness of available contraceptive methods and lower knowledge about individual methods compared with White women and young adults (age 20-29 years).
56. Borrero S, Farkas A, Dehlendorf C, Rocca CH. Racial and ethnic differences in men's knowledge and attitudes about contraception. Contraception 2013; 88:532-538.
57. Zhang S, Cardarelli K, Shim R, et al. Racial disparities in economic and clinical outcomes of pregnancy among Medicaid recipients. Matern Child Health J 2013; 17:1518-1525. A cross-sectional study of adverse pregnancy outcomes and Medicaid payments using data on all Medicaid enrollees in fourteen Southern states. African-American women had a higher rate of adverse pregnancy outcomes than White or Hispanic women. A significant financial return-on-investment tied to eliminating racial disparities in birth outcomes is described.
58. Rodriguez MI, Caughey AB, Edelman A, et al. Cost-benefit analysis of stateand hospital-funded postpartum intrauterine contraception at a university hospital for recent immigrants to the United States. Contraception 2010; 81:304-308.
59. Rodriguez MI, Angus L, Elman E, et al. Financial effect of instituting Deficit Reduction Act documentation requirements in family planning clinics in Oregon. Contraception 2011; 83:537-541.
60. Markus AR, Andres E, West KD, et al. Medicaid covered births, 2008 through 2010, in the context of the implementation of health reform. Womens Health Issues 2013; 23:e273-e280.
61. Kozhimannil KB, Shippee TP, Adegoke O, Vemig BA. Trends in hospitalbased childbirth care: the role of health insurance. Am J Manag Care 2013; 19:e125-e132. A well designed retrospective analysis of hospital discharge data examining trends in mode of delivery by primary payer. Births covered by Medicaid had lower odds of cesarean delivery (AOR, 0.91), labor induction (AOR, 0.73), and episiotomy (AOR, 0.62) and higher odds of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (AOR, 1.20; P < 0.001 for all AORs) compared with privately insured births.
62. Ranji U, Stewart AM, Cox M, Doamekpor L. State Medicaid coverage of family planning services: summary of state Survey findings. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2009.
63. Hasstedt K. Toward equity and access: removing legal barriers to health insurance coverage for immigrants. Guttmacher Policy Rev 2013; 16:2-8. A concise review of legislative changes and state policies regarding insurance coverage of immigrants from the Guttmacher Institute, including in-depth discussion of the status of maternity coverage and contraceptive service and supply access for undocumented and recent immigrants.
64. Gee RE. Preventive services for women under the Affordable Care Act. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120:12-14.
65. Gee RE, Levy B, Reyes C; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Health Policy C. Health reform in action: updates on implementation of the Affordable Care Act. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123:869-873. A useful update on implementation of relevant portions of the ACA as of April 2014, written for obstetricians and gynecologists.
66. Gee RE, Rosenbaum S. The Affordable Care Act: an overview for obstetricians and gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120:1263-1266.
67. Health Reform: Implications for Women's Access to Coverage and Care. Issue Brief. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation: Washington, DC, 2013. http:// kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/7987-03-health-reformimplications- for-women-s-access-to-coverage-and-care.pdf. [Accessed 1 June 2014] This recent brief discusses the impact of the health reform law on women in terms of access to coverage, healthcare affordability, scope of benefits, reproductive health, and long-term care.
68. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Benefits to women of Medicaid expansion through the Affordable Care Act. Committee Opinion #522. January 2013. This Committee Opinion highlights ACOG's support for appropriate reimbursement to healthcare providers and universal expansion of Medicaid as key strategies to improve the health of low-income women.
69. Mas N. Responding to financial pressures. The effect of managed care on hospitals' provision of charity care. Int J Healthcare Finance Econ 2013; 13:95-114. Financial pressures imposed by managed care disproportionately affect closure of safety net hospitals. Among those hospitals that remain open, hospitals may react by closing services most used by uninsured in areas where managed care penetration is highest.
70. Ko M, Needleman J, Derose KP, et al. Residential segregation and the survival of U.S. urban public hospitals. Med Care Res Rev 2014; 71:243-260.
71. Dennis A, Blanchard K, Cordova D, et al. What happens to the women who fall through the cracks of healthcare reform? Lessons from Massachusetts. J Health Polit Policy Law 2013; 38:393-419. Exploratory mixed methods study from 2008 to 2009 documenting perspectives and experiences of women seeking publicly funded family planning services and providers involved in service delivery, before and after health reform in Massachusetts. Altough reform was found to lead to overall improved access, particular barriers were faced by minors, immigrants, and women living outside of urban areas. Specific barriers were as follows: confusing eligibility and enrollment requirements, difficulty obtaining an appointment, and difficulty using prescription benefits.
72. Mohan A, Grant J, Batalden M, McCormick D. The health of safety net hospitals following Massachusetts healthcare reform: changes in volume, revenue, costs, and operating margins from 2006 to 2009. Int J Health Serv 2013; 43:321-335. Quasiexperimental descriptive study using a difference-in-differences analysis to show that in the years following Massachusetts health reform (2006-2009) safety net hospitals continued to play a disproportionately large role in caring for disadvantaged patients but underwent a loss of revenue compared with nonsafety net hospitals.
73. Carter M, Desilets K, Gavin L, et al. Trends in uninsured clients visiting health centers funded by the Title X family planning program: Massachusetts, 2005- 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2014; 63:59-62. This report from the CDC documents trends in Title X family planning clinic usage in Massachusetts during the years following health reform, 2005-2012. Authors describe maintenance of high client volume in five continuously funded clinics, with a decrease in uninsured clients from 59 to 36% over 6 years. Across all years, 43-46% of all clients were aged 20-29 years, also the age group at highest risk for unintended pregnancy and most likely to remain uninsured.
74. Oglesby WH. Do we still need Title X? Perceptions of and preferences for federally-funded family planning clinics. Reprod Health 2014; 11:50.
75. Neuhausen K, Davis AC, Needleman J, et al. Disproportionate-share hospital payment reductions may threaten the financial stability of safety-net hospitals. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014; 33:988-996. Decreases in uncompensated care costs in the state of California due to ACA insurance expansion may not match the ACA's disproportionate share hospital payment reductions due to a high number of remaining uninsured, low Medicaid reimbursement rates, and medical cost inflation, with unmet costs estimated at $1.38-1.54 billion between 2010 and 2019.
76. Tandon SD, Cluxton-Keller F, Colon L, et al. Improved adequacy of prenatal care and healthcare utilization among low-income Latinas receiving group prenatal care. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2013; 22:1056-1061. This prospective cohort study demonstrates that a Centering/group prenatal care intervention improved postpartum satisfaction with prenatal care (84.3 Centering vs. 64.9 traditional, P<0.001) and engagement in care as measured by surveys, postpartum visit compliance, establishment of a medical home, and child emergency room visits (39.7 vs. 28.1, P<0.001) in a population of low-income Latina women.
77. Hale N, Picklesimer AH, Billings DL, Covington-Kolb S. The impact of Centering Pregnancy Group Prenatal Care on postpartum family planning. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210:50.e1-50.e7. This retrospective cohort study determined that utilization of postpartum family planning services was higher among women participating in group prenatal care compared with propensity score-matched controls receiving individual prenatal care at four points in time, with highest adherence to postpartum family planning visits in non-Hispanic Black women in the group prenatal care group.
78. Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services. Strong start for mothers and newborns initiative: general information. Innovation Models 2014; http:// innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/Strong-Start-Strategy-2/index.html. [Accessed 3 July 2014]
79. Kangovi S, Mitra N, Grande D, et al. Patient-centered community health worker intervention to improve posthospital outcomes: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174:535-543. This randomized control trial demonstrates that a high-quality community health worker intervention improved primary care follow-up [odds ratio 1.52, confidence interval (CI) 1.03-2.23] and decreased rate of recurrent readmission from 40 to 15% (odds ratio 0.27, CI 0.08-0.89) in a population of low-SES patients admitted to an inpatient medicine service.
80. Artiga S, Stephens J, Lyons B, Heiman H. Advancing opportunities, assessing challenges: key themes from a roundtable discussion of health care and health equity in the South. Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured; 2014. This brief summarizes a roundtable discussion by key stakeholders regarding current and future opportunities and challenges for advancing healthcare and health equity in the South. Opportunities provided by the ACA and high-priority strategies for addressing disparities are reviewed.
81. deRosset L, Mullenix A, Flores A, et al. Promotora de salud: promoting folic acid use among Hispanic women. JWomens Health (Larchmt) 2014; 23:525-531.
82. Yun K, Chesnokova A,Matone M, et al. Effect of maternal-child home visitation on pregnancy spacing for first-time Latina mothers. Am J Public Health 2014; 104 (Suppl 1):S152-S158. This retrospective cohort study examines the impact of a maternal-child nursing home visitation program on birth spacing for first-time Latina mothers, noting a small decrease in risk of an interpregnancy interval less than 18 months (hazard ratio 0.86, CI 0.75-0.99) in the exposure group.
83. Thompson DK, Clark MJ, Howland LC, Mueller MR. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (PL 111-148): an analysis of maternal-child health home visitation. Policy Polit Nurs Pract 2011; 12:175-185.
84. Cleland K, Peipert JF, Westhoff C, et al. Family planning as a cost-saving preventive health service. N Engl J Med 2011; 364:e37.
85. Peipert JF, Madden T, Allsworth JE, Secura GM. Preventing unintended pregnancies by providing no-cost contraception. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120:1291-1297.
86. Grossman D, Fuentes L. Over-the-counter access to oral contraceptives as a reproductive healthcare strategy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2013; 25:500-505. This excellent review summarizes current evidence on the safety and effectiveness of moving oral contraceptives from prescription-only to over-the-counter status. Potential barriers and facilitators to an over-the-counter switch are discussed.