Financial effect of instituting deficit reduction act documentation requirements in family planning clinics in Oregon

Contraception

Volumn 83, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 537-541

  Rodriguez, Maria Isabel ^a   Angus, Lisa ^b   Elman, Emily ^b   Darney, Philip D ^c   Caughey, Aaron B ^a  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OREGON PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cost analysis; Deficit reduction act; Family planning; Policy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CITIZENSHIP; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCUMENTATION; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAID; MONTE CARLO METHOD; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PREGNANCY; REIMBURSEMENT; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY; UNITED STATES;

AMBULATORY CARE FACILITIES; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; DOCUMENTATION; EMIGRANTS AND IMMIGRANTS; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MARKOV CHAINS; MEDICAID; MODELS, ECONOMIC; MONTE CARLO METHOD; OREGON; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, UNPLANNED; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79955939914     PISSN: 00107824     EISSN: 18790518     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.09.014     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Foster DG, Rostovtseva DP, Brindis CD, Biggs MA, Hulett D, Darney PD. Cost savings from the provision of specific methods of contraception in a publicly funded program. Am J Public Health 2009;99:446-51.
2. Amaral G, Foster DG, Biggs MA, Jasik CB, Judd S, Brindis CD. Public savings from the prevention of unintended pregnancy: a cost analysis of family planning services in California. Health Serv Res 2007;42:1960-80. (Pubitemid 47397182)
3. Gold RB. Breaking New Ground: Ingenuity and innovation in medicaid family planning expansions, Vol. 11. New York (NY): Guttmacher Institute; 2008. p. 6.
4. Frost JJ, Sonfield A, Gold RB. Estimating the impact of expanding medicaid eligibility for family planning services. Occasional Report. New York (NY): The Guttmacher Institute; 2006. p. 33.
5. Foster DG, Biggs MA, Amaral G, et al. Estimates of pregnancies averted through California's family planning waiver program in 2002. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2006;38:126-31.
6. Foster DG, Klaisle CM, Blum M, Bradsberry ME, Brindis CD, Stewart FH. Expanded state-funded family planning services: estimating pregnancies averted by the Family PACT Program in California, 1997-1998. Am J Public Health 2004;94:1341-6.
7. Angus L, Devoe J. Evidence that the citizenship mandate curtailed participation in Oregon's Medicaid family planning program. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:690-8.
8. Ku L. New requirement for birth certificates or passports could threaten Medicaid coverage for vulnerable beneficiaries: a state by state analysis. Washington DC: Center for Budget and Policy Priorities; 2006.
9. DuBard CA, Massing MW. Trends in emergency Medicaid expenditures for recent and undocumented immigrants. JAMA 2007;297:1085-92. (Pubitemid 46425513)
10. Rodriguez MI, Edelman A, Wallace N, Jensen JT. Denying postpartum sterilization to women with Emergency Medicaid does not reduce hospital charges. Contraception 2008;78:232-6.
11. Cosgrove J. States reported that citizenship documentation requirement resulted in enrollment declines for eligible citizens and posed administrative burdens. Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office; 2007. p. 43.
12. Trussell J, Lalla AM, Doan QV, Reyes E, Pinto L, Gricar J. Cost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States. Contraception 2009;79:5-14.
13. Hatcher RATJ, Nelson AL. Contraceptive Technology. 18th ed. New York (NY): Ardent Media; 2004.
14. Price Rx drug price and reference tool (Medi-Span Master Drug Database). In: Health WK, ed. Vol. 2009.
15. Lilford RJ, Pauker SG, Braunholtz DA, Chard J. Decision analysis and the implementation of research findings. BMJ 1998;317:405-9.
16. Ponce N, Nordyke RJ, Hirota S. Uninsured working immigrants: a view from a California county. J Immigr Health 2005;7:45-53. (Pubitemid 40372997)
17. Okie S. Immigrants and health care-at the intersection of two broken systems. N Engl J Med 2007;357:525-9. (Pubitemid 47236276)
18. Phibbs CS, Schmitt SK. Estimates of the cost and length of stay changes that can be attributed to one-week increases in gestational age for premature infants. Early Hum Dev 2006;82:85-95. (Pubitemid 43234042)
19. Finer LB, Henshaw SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2006;38:90-6.
20. Gipson JD, Koenig MA, Hindin MJ. The effects of unintended pregnancy on infant, child, and parental health: a review of the literature. Stud Fam Plann 2008;39:18-38.