Current strategies for reproductive management of gilts and sows in North America

Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Kraeling, Robert R ^a   Webel, Stephen K ^b  

^a L and R Research Associates   (United States)

^b JBS United   (United States)

Author keywords

Gilts; Management; Nutrition; Reproductive technology; Sows

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84928007637     PISSN: 16749782     EISSN: 20491891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2049-1891-6-3     Document Type: Review

References (152)

1. Foxcroft GR, Dixon WT, Novak S, Putnam CT, Town SC, Vinsky MDA. The biological basis for prenatal programming of postnatal performance in pigs. J Anim Sci 2006, 84(E. Suppl):E105-12.
2. PigChamp USA 2012 - year end summary 2013, http://benchmark.farms.com/2013_Summary_of_the_2012_data.html, PigChamp.
3. Stalder KJ. Pork industry productivity analysis, research grant report 2014, 1-13. Des Moines, Iowa: National Pork Board.
4. Ketchem R, Rix M. SMS Database Revision Reveals Intriguing Production Trends. National Hog Farmer 2014, (Online Exclusive http://nationalhogfarmer.com/business/sms-database-revision-reveals-intriguing-production-trends?page=1). 2014. January 6, 2014.
5. Knox RV, Rodriguez Zas SL, Sloter NL, McNamara KA, Gall TJ, Levis DG, et al. An analysis of survey data by size of the breeding herd for the reproductive management practices of North American sow farms. J Anim Sci 2013, 91:433-45. 10.2527/jas.2012-5189, 23097401.
6. Engblom L, Lundeheim N, Strandberg E, Schneider MP, Dalin AM, Andersson K. Factors affecting length of productive life in Swedish commercial sows. J Anim Sci 2008, 86:432-41.
7. Gill P. Nutritional management of the gilt for lifetime productivity - feeding for fitness or fatness?. London Swine Conference Proceedings. London, Ontario: Today's Challenges. . . Tomorrow's Opportunities 2007, 83-99.
8. Lucia T, Dial GD, Marsh WE. Lifetime reproductive performance in female pigs having distinct reasons for removal. Livest Prod Sci 2000, 63:213-22.
9. Tomes GK, Nielson HE. Factors affecting reproductive efficiency of the breeding herd. Control of pig reproduction 1982, 527-9. London: Butterworth Scientific, Cole DJA, Foxcroft G.
10. Foxcroft G, Beltranena E, Patterson J, Williams N, Pizzarro G. Physiological limits to maximizing sow productivity. London Swine Conference Proceedings 2005, 29-46. London, Ontario: Production at the leading edge.
11. Foxcroft G, Patterson J, Dyck M. Improving production efficiency in a competitive industry. 24th Manitoba Swine Seminar. Sharing Ideas and Information for Efficient Pork Production 2010, 81-98. Winnipeg, Manitoba: Manitoba Pork Council.
12. Williams N, Patterson J, Foxcroft GR. Non-negotiables of gilt development. Advances in Pork Production 2005, 16:1-9.
13. Bortolozzo FP, Bernardi ML, Kummer R, Wentz I. Growth, body state and breeding performance in gilts and primiparous sows. Soc Reprod Fertil 2009, 66(Suppl):281-91.
14. Wiedmann R. Advances in sow and gilt management. London Swine Conference Proceedings 2010, 53-9. London, Ontario: Focus on the Future.
15. Whitney MH, Masker C. Replacement gilt and boar nutrient recommendations and feeding management 2010, U.S. Pork Center of Excellence: Des Moines, Iowa.
16. Sterning M, Rydhmer L, Eliasson-Selling L. Relationships between age at puberty and interval from weaning to estrus and between estrus signs at puberty and after the first weaning in pigs. J Anim Sci 1998, 76:353-9.
17. Stalder KJ, Johnson C, Miller DP, Baas TJ, Berry N, Christian AE, et al. Replacement gilt evaluation guide: for the evaluation of structural, feet, leg and reproductive soundness in repalcement gilts 2009, Des Moines, Iowa: National Pork Board.
18. Wilson ME, Ward TL. Impact of lameness on productive potential of the sow. London Swine Conference. A Time for Change: 28 March 2012 2012, 27-33.
19. Filha WSA, Bernardi ML, Wentz I, Bortolozzo FP. Growth rate and age at boar exposure as factors influencing gilt puberty. Livestock Sci 2009, 120:51-7.
20. Rozeboom DW, Pettigrew JE, Moser RL, Cornelius SG, El Kandelgy SM. Influence of gilt age and body composition at first breeding on sow reproductive performance and longevity. J Anim Sci 1996, 74:138-50.
21. Hoge MD, Bates RO. Developmental factors that influence sow longevity. J Anim Sci 2011, 89:1238-45. 10.2527/jas.2010-3175, 21183709.
22. Gonyou H, Rioja-Lang F, Seddon Y. Group housing systems: floor space allowance and group size 2013, Des Moines, Iowa: National Pork Board.
23. Southern LL, Olayiwola A, DeLange CFM, Hill GM, Kerr BJ, Lindemann MD, et al. Nutrient requirements of swine 2012, Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
24. Rodriguez-Zas SL, Davis CB, Ellinger PN, Schnitkey GD, Romine NM, Connor JF, et al. Impact of biological and economic variables on optimal parity for replacement in swine breed-to-wean herds. J Anim Sci 2006, 84:2555-65. 10.2527/jas.2005-635, 16908661.
25. Stalder KJ, Lacy C, Cross TL, Conatser GE. Financial impact of average parity of culled females in a breed-to-wean swine operation using replacement gilt net present value analysis. J Swine Health Prod 2003, 11:69-74.
26. Anil SS, Anil L, Deen J. Analysis of periparturient risk factors affecting sow longevity in breeding herds. Can J Anim Sci 2008, 88:381-9.
27. Flowers W. Gilt and sow management considerations in sow longevity. Banff Pork Seminar. Advances in Pork Production: 21-23 January 2014 2014, 26-55.
28. Serenius T, Stalder KJ, Baas TJ, Mabry JW, Goodwin RN, Johnson RK, et al. National pork producers council maternal line national genetic evaluation program: a comparison of sow longevity and trait associations with sow longevity. J Anim Sci 2006, 84:2590-5. 10.2527/jas.2005-499, 16908665.
29. Martineau G-P, Badouard B. Managing highly prolific sows. London Swine Conference. Tools of the Trade 2014, 3-19. 4-1-2009.
30. Ball RO, Samuel RS, Moehn S. Nutrient requirements of prolific sows. Advances in Pork Production 2008, 19:223-36.
31. Boyd RD, Castro GC, Cabrera RA. Nutrition and management of the sow to maximize lifetime productivity. Advances in Pork Production 2002, 13:47-59.
32. Campos PH, Silva BA, Donzele JL, Oliveira RF, Knol EF. Effects of sow nutrition during gestation on within-litter birth weight variation: a review. Animal 2012, 6:797-806. 10.1017/S1751731111002242, 22558927.
33. Kim SW, Weaver AC, Shen YB, Zhao Y. Improving efficiency of sow productivity: nutrition and health. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2013, 4:26. 10.1186/2049-1891-4-26, 3733949, 23885840.
34. Moehn S, Ball RO. London swine conference. Managing for production 2013, 55-63. 3-27-2013.
35. Peltoniemi OA, Oliviero C, Halli O, Heinonen M. Feeding affects reproductive performance and reproductive endocrinology in the gilt and sow. Acta Vet Scand 2007, 49 Suppl 1:S6.
36. Theil PK, Lauridsen C, Quesnel H. Neonatal piglet survival: impact of sow nutrition around parturition on fetal glycogen deposition and production and composition of colostrum and transient milk. Animal 2014, 8:1-10.
37. Langendijk P, Peltoniemi O. How does nutrition influence luteal function and early embryo survival. Soc Reprod Fertil 2013, 68:145-58.
38. Vignola M. Sow feeding management during lactation. London Swine Conference. Tools of the Trade 2009, 107-17. 4-1-2009.
39. Love RJ, Klupiec C, Thornton EJ, Evans G. An interaction between feeding rate and season affects fertility of sows. Anim Reprod Sci 1995, 39:275-84.
40. Virolainen JV, Tast A, Sorsa A, Love RJ, Peltoniemi OA. Changes in feeding level during early pregnancy affect fertility in gilts. Anim Reprod Sci 2004, 80:341-52. 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.08.005, 15036509.
41. Johnston L. Gestating swine nutrient recommendations and feeding management 2010, Des Moines, Iowa, U.S: Pork Center of Excellence. National Swine Nutrition Guide.
42. Moehn S, Levesque CL, Samuel RS, Ball RO. Applying new research to reduce sow feed costs. Advances in Pork Production 2009, 20:84-94.
43. Moehn S, Franco D, Levesque C, Samuel R, Ball RO. Phase feeding for pregnant sows 2012, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Swine Research and Technology Center 4-10 Agriculture/Forestry Centre University of Alberta.
44. Young MG, Tokach MD, Aherne FX, Main RG, Dritz SS, Goodband RD, et al. Comparison of three methods of feeding sows in gestation and the subsequent effects on lactation performance. J Anim Sci 2004, 82:3058-70.
45. Oliviero C. Management to improve neonate piglet survival. Soc Reprod Fertil 2013, 68:203-10.
46. National Agricultural Statistic Service NASS Agricultural statistics book by year 2011, Washington DC, USA: Government Printing Office, National Agricultural Statistic Service NASS.
47. Kauffold J, Gottschalk J, Schneider F, Beynon N, Wahner M. Effects of feeding level during lactation on FSH and LH secretion patterns, and follicular development in primiparous sows. Reprod Domest Anim 2008, 43:234-8. 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2007.00880.x, 18042210.
48. Jones DB, Stahly TS. Impact of amino acid nutrition during lactation on luteinizing hormone secretion and return to estrus in primiparous sows. J Anim Sci 1999, 77:1523-31.
49. Jones DB, Stahly TS. Impact of amino acid nutrition during lactation on body nutrient mobilization and milk nutrient output in primiparous sows. J Anim Sci 1999, 77:1513-22.
50. Quesnel H, Pasquier A, Mounier AM, Prunier A. Influence of feed restriction during lactation on gonadotropic hormones and ovarian development in primiparous sows. J Anim Sci 1998, 76:856-63.
51. Kemp B, Soede NM, Helmond FA, Bosch MW. Effects of energy source in the diet on reproductive hormones and insulin during lactation and subsequent estrus in multiparous sows. J Anim Sci 1995, 73:3022-9.
52. Prunier A, Quesnel H, de Braganca MM, Kermabon MY. Environmental and seasonal influences on the return-to-oestrus after weaning in primiparous sows: a review. Livest Prod Sci 1996, 45:103-10.
53. Prunier A, DeBragana MM, LeDividich J. Influence of high ambient temperature on performance of reproductive sows. Livest Prod Sci 1997, 52:123-33.
54. Quiniou N, Noblet J. Influence of high ambient temperatures on performance of multiparous lactating sows. J Anim Sci 1999, 77:2124-34.
55. Renaudeau D, Noblet J. Effects of exposure to high ambient temperature and dietary protein level on sow milk production and performance of piglets. J Anim Sci 2001, 79:1540-8.
56. Silva BA, Noblet J, Donzele JL, Oliveira RF, Primot Y, Gourdine JL, et al. Effects of dietary protein level and amino acid supplementation on performance of mixed-parity lactating sows in a tropical humid climate. J Anim Sci 2009, 87:4003-12. 10.2527/jas.2008-1176, 19749018.
57. Silva BA, Noblet J, Oliveira RFM, Donzele JL, Fernandez HC, Lima AL, et al. Effect of floor cooling and dietary amino acids content on performance and behaviour of lactating primiparous sows during summer. Livest Sci 2014, 120:25-34.
58. van den Brand H, Kemp B. Dietary fat and reproduction in the post partum sow. Soc Reprod Fertil 2006, 62(Suppl):177-89.
59. Leibbrandt VD, Johnston LJ, Shurson GC, Crenshaw JD, Libal GW, Arthur RD. Effect of nipple drinker water flow rate and season on performance of lactating swine. J Anim Sci 2001, 79:2770-5.
60. Mroz Z, Jongbloed AW, Lenis NP, Vreman K. Water in pig nutrition: physiology, allowances and environmental implications. Nutr Res Rev 1995, 8:137-64. 10.1079/NRR19950010, 19094283.
61. Edgerton LA. Effect of lactation upon the postpartum interval. J Anim Sci 1980, 51(Suppl 2):40-52.
62. Soede NM, Hazeleger W, Gerritsen R, Langendijk P, Kemp B. Ovarian responses to lactation management strategies. Soc Reprod Fertil 2009, 66(Suppl):177-86.
63. Mabry JW, Culbertson MS, Reeves D. Effects of lactation length on weaning-to-first service interval, first-service farrowing rate, and subsequent litter size. Swine Health Prod 1996, 4:185-8.
64. Niell C, Williams N. Milk production and nutritional requirements of modern sows. London Swine ConferenceProceedings 2010, 232-31. London, Ontario: Focus on the Future.
65. Einarsson S, Sjunnesson Y, Hulten F, Eliasson-Selling L, Dalin AM, Lundeheim N, et al. A 25 years experience of group-housed sows-reproduction in animal welfare-friendly systems. Acta Vet Scand 2014, 56:37. 10.1186/1751-0147-56-37, 4061533, 24910081.
66. Jansen J, Kirkwood RN, Zanella AJ, Tempelman RJ. Influence of gestation housing on sow behavior and fertility. J Swine Health Prod 2007, 15:132-6.
67. Rhodes RT, Appleby MC, Chinn K, Douglas L, Firkins LD, Houpt KA, et al. A comprehensive review of housing for pregnant sows. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005, 227:1580-90. 10.2460/javma.2005.227.1580, 16313035.
68. McGlone JJ, Stansbury WF, Tribble LF. Management of lactating sows during heat stress: effects of water drip, snout coolers, floor type and a high energy-density diet. J Anim Sci 1988, 66:885-91.
69. McGlone JJ, Stansbury WF, Tribble LF, Morrow JL. Photoperiod and heat stress influence on lactating sow performance and photoperiod effects on nursery pig performance. J Anim Sci 1988, 66:1915-9.
70. McGlone JJ, von Borell EH, Deen J, Johnson AK, Levis DG, Meunier-Salaun M, et al. Review: compilation of the scientific literature comparing housing systems for gestating sows and gilts using measures of physiology, behavior, performance, and health. Prof Anim Sci 2004, 20:105-17.
71. McGlone JJ. Review: updated scientific evidence on the welfare of gestating sows kept in different housing systems. Prof Anim Sci 2013, 29:189-98.
72. McGlone JJ, Salak-Johnson J. Changing from Sow gestation crates to pens: problem or opportunity? 2008 Manitoba Swine Seminar. Proceedings of the Manitoba Swine Seminar 2008, 47-53. Winnipeg, Manitoba: Manitoba Pork Council.
73. Knox RV. Impact of swine reproductive technologies on pig and global food production. Adv Exp Med Biol 2014, 752:131-60. 10.1007/978-1-4614-8887-3_7, 24170358.
74. Council Directive 2008/120/EC Laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs 2008, Council Directive 2008/120/EC.
75. Soede NM, Langendijk P, Kemp B. Reproductive cycles in pigs. Anim Reprod Sci 2011, 124:251-8. 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.02.025, 21397415.
76. Soede NM, Kemp B. Expression of oestrus and timing of ovulation in pigs. J Reprod Fertil 1997, 52(Suppl):91-103.
77. Knox RV, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Miller GM, Willenburg KL, Robb JA. Administration of P.G. 600 to sows at weaning and the time of ovulation as determined by transrectal ultrasound. J Anim Sci 2001, 79:796-802.
78. Soede NM, Wetzels CC, Zondag W, de Koning MA, Kemp B. Effects of time of insemination relative to ovulation, as determined by ultrasonography, on fertilization rate and accessory sperm count in sows. J Reprod Fertil 1995, 104:99-106. 10.1530/jrf.0.1040099, 7636812.
79. Almeida FRCL, Novak S, Foxcroft GR. The time of ovulation in relation to estrus duration in gilts. Theriogenology 2000, 53:1389-96. 10.1016/S0093-691X(00)00281-8, 10898208.
80. Kemp B, Soede NM. Consequences of variation in interval from insemination to ovulation on fertilization in pigs. J Reprod Fertil 1997, 52(Suppl):79-89.
81. Rozeboom KJ, Troedsson MH, Shurson GC, Hawton JD, Crabo BG. Late estrus or metestrus insemination after estrual inseminations decreases farrowing rate and litter size in swine. J Anim Sci 1997, 75:2323-7.
82. Baxter EM, Edwards SA. Determining piglet survival. Soc Reprod Fertil 2013, 68:129-43.
83. Foxcroft GR. Reproduction in farm animals in an era of rapid genetic change: will genetic change outpace our knowledge of physiology?. Reprod Domest Anim 2012, 47(Suppl 4):313-9.
84. Phillips CE, Farmer C, Anderson JE, Johnston LJ, Shurson GC, Deen J, et al. Pre-weaning mortality in group-housed lactating sows: hormonal differences between high risk and low risk sows. J Anim Sci 2014, 92:2603-11. 10.2527/jas.2014-7624, 24713168.
85. Vanderhaeghe C, Dewulf J, de Kruif A, Maes D. Non-infectious factors associated with stillbirth in pigs: a review. Anim Reprod Sci 2013, 139:76-88. 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2013.03.007, 23602009.
86. McCaw MB. McREBEL™ PRRS: management procedures for PRRS control in large herd nurseries. Leman Swine Conference, vol. 22 1995, 161-2. Allen D.
87. McCaw MB. Impact of McREBELTM (minmum cross-fostering) management upon nursery pig sale weight and survival under production conditions in PRRS asymtomatic herds. International Pig Veterinary Society Congress. Proceedings of the International Pig Veterinary Society Congress 2000, 333.
88. McCaw MB. Effect of reducing cross-fostering at birth on piglet mortality and performance during an acute outbreak of porcine reproductive respiratory syndrome. Swine Health Prod 2000, 8:15-21.
89. Quesnel H, Gondret F, Merlot E, Loisel F, Farmer C. Sow influence on neonatal survival: a special focus on colostrum. Soc Reprod Fertil 2013, 68:117-28.
90. Holyoake PK, Dial GD, Trigg T, King VL. Reducing pig mortality through supervision during the perinatal period. J Anim Sci 1995, 73:3543-51.
91. Nguyen K, Casser G, Friendship RM, Dewey C, Farzan A, Kirkwood RN. Stillbirth and preweaning mortality in litters of sows induced to farrow with supervision compared to litters of naturally farrowing sows with minimal supervision. J Swine Health Prod 2011, 19:214-7.
92. Britt JH, Szarek VE, Levis DG. Characterization of summer infertility of sows in large confinement units. Theriogenology 1983, 20:133-40. 10.1016/0093-691X(83)90032-8, 16725840.
93. Claus R, Weiler U. Influence of light and photoperiodicity on pig prolificacy. J Reprod Fertil 1985, 33(Suppl):185-97.
94. Love RJ. Seasonal infertility in pigs. Vet Rec 1981, 109:407-9. 10.1136/vr.109.18.407, 7340074.
95. Love RJ, Evans G, Klupiec C. Seasonal effects on fertility in gilts and sows. J Reprod Fertil 1993, 48(Suppl):191-206.
96. Peltoniemi OA, Virolainen JV. Seasonality of reproduction in gilts and sows. Soc Reprod Fertil 2005, 62(Suppl):205-18.
97. Wettemann RR, Bazer FW. Influence of environmental temperature on prolificacy in pigs. J Reprod Fertil 1985, 33(Suppl):199-208.
98. Mabry JW, Cunningham FJ, Kraeling RR, Rampacek GB. The effect of artificially extended photoperiod during lactation on maternal performance of the sow. J Anim Sci 1982, 54:918-21.
99. Kraeling RR, Rampacek GB, Mabry JW, Cunningham FL, Pinkert CA. Serum concentrations of pituitary and adrenal hormones in female pigs exposed to two photoperiods. J Anim Sci 1983, 57:1243-50.
100. Mabry JW, Coffey MT, Seerley RW. A comparison of an 8- versus 16-h photoperiod during lactation on suckling frequency of the baby pig and maternal performance of the sow. J Anim Sci 1983, 57:292-5.
101. Auvigne V, Leneveu P, Jehannin C, Peltoniemi O, Salle E. Seasonal infertility in sows: a five year field study to analyze the relative roles of heat stress and photoperiod. Theriogenology 2010, 74:60-6. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.12.019, 20189636.
102. Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL. Behavioural responses affecting gilt and sow reproduction. J Reprod Fertil 1990, 40(Suppl):343-54.
103. Hemsworth PH. Human-animal interactions in livestock production. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2003, 81:185-98.
104. Kirkden RD, Broom DM, Andersen IL. Invited review: piglet mortality: management solutions. J Anim Sci 2013, 91:3361-89. 10.2527/jas.2012-5637, 23798524.
105. Estill CT. Current concepts in estrus synchronization in swine. Proc Am Soc Anim Sci 1999, 77:1-9.
106. Ulberg LC, Grummer RH, Casida LE. The effects of progesterone upon ovarian function in gilts. J Anim Sci 1951, 10:665-71.
107. Anderson LL, Dyck GW, Mori H, Henricks DM, Melampy RM. Ovarian function in pigs following hypophysial stalk transection or hypophysectomy. Am J Physiol 1967, 212:1188-94.
108. Du Mesnil Du Buisson F, Leglise PC. Effet de l'hypophysectomie sur les corps jaunes de la truie. C R Hebd Seances Acad Sci 1963, 257:261-3.
109. Diehl JR, Day BN. Effect of prostaglandin F2 alpha on luteal function in swine. J Anim Sci 1974, 39:392-6.
110. Hallford DM, Wettemann RP, Turman EJ, Omtvedt IT. Luteal function in gilts after prostaglandin F2alpha. J Anim Sci 1975, 41:1706-10.
111. Webel SK, Day BN. The control of ovulation. Control of pig reproduction 1982, 197-210. London: Butterworth Scientific, Cole DJA, Foxcroft G.
112. Webel SK. Ovulation control in the pig. Control of Ovulation 1978, 421-34. London: Butterworth Scientific, Crighton DB, Foxcroft G, Haynes NB, Lamming GE.
113. Estienne MJ, Harper AF, Horsley BR, Estienne CE, Knight JW. Effects of P.G. 600 on the onset of estrus and ovulation rate in gilts treated with Regu-mate. J Anim Sci 2001, 79:2757-61.
114. Kraeling RR, Dziuk PJ, Pursel VG, Rampacek GB, Webel SK. Synchronization of estrus in swine with allyl trenbolone (RU-2267). J Anim Sci 1981, 52:831-5.
115. Martinat-Botte F, Bariteau F, Badouard B, Terqui M. Control of pig reproduction in a breeding programme. J Reprod Fertil 1985, 33(Suppl):211-28.
116. Sporke J, Patterson J, Beltranena E, Foxcroft GR. Gilt development unit management and using matrix and pg600 in a commercial swine operation. Leman Swine Conference 2005, 72-100. Allen D.
117. Wood CM, Kornegay ET, Shipley CF. Efficacy of altrenogest in synchronizing estrus in two swine breeding programs and effects on subsequent reproductive performance of sows. J Anim Sci 1992, 70:1357-64.
118. Guthrie HD. Control of time of parturition in pigs. J Reprod Fertil 1985, 33(Suppl):229-44.
119. Foisnet A, Farmer C, David C, Quesnel H. Altrenogest treatment during late pregnancy did not reduce colostrum yield in primiparous sows. J Anim Sci 2010, 88:1684-93. 10.2527/jas.2009-2751, 20118420.
120. Gooneratne A, Hartmann PE, McCauley I, Martin CE. Control of parturition in the sow using progesterone and prostaglandin. Aust J Biol Sci 1979, 32:587-95.
121. Guthrie HD, Meckley PE, Young EP, Hartsock TG. Effect of altrenogest and Lutalyse on parturition control, plasma progesterone, unconjugated estrogen and 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F2 alpha in sows. J Anim Sci 1987, 65:203-11.
122. Jackson JR, Hurley WL, Easter RA, Jensen AH, Odle J. Effects of induced or delayed parturition and supplemental dietary fat on colostrum and milk composition in sows. J Anim Sci 1995, 73:1906-13.
123. Martinat-Botte F, Bariteau F, Forgerit Y, Macar C, Poirier P, Terqui M. Control of reproduction with a progestagen-altrenogest (Regumate) in gilts and at weaning in primiparous sows: effect on fertility and litter size [Abstract]. Reprod Domest Anim 1994, 29:362-5.
124. van Leeuwen JJ, Martens MR, Jourquin J, Driancourt MA, Kemp B, Soede NM. Effects of altrenogest treatments before and after weaning on follicular development, farrowing rate, and litter size in sows. J Anim Sci 2011, 89:2397-406. 10.2527/jas.2010-3752, 21421833.
125. Fernandez L, Diez C, Ordonez J, Carbajo M. Reproductive performance in primiparous sows after postweaning treatment with a progestagen. J Swine Health Prod 2005, 13:28-30.
126. Knox RV, Tudor KW, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Robb JA. Effect of subcutaneous vs intramuscular administration of P.G. 600 on estrual and ovulatory responses of prepubertal gilts. J Anim Sci 2000, 78:1732-7.
127. Britt JH, Day BN, Webel SK, Brauer MA. Induction of fertile estrus in prepuberal gilts by treatment with a combination of pregnant mare's serum gonadotropin and human chorionic gonadotropin. J Anim Sci 1989, 67:1148-53.
128. Brussow KP, Schneider F, Kanitz W, Ratky J, Kauffold J, Wahner M. Studies on fixed-time ovulation induction in the pig. Soc Reprod Fertil 2009, 66(Suppl):187-95.
129. Kirkwood RN. Pharmacological intervention in swine reproduction. Swine Health Prod 1999, 7:29-55.
130. Kirkwood RN, Aherne FX, Foxcroft GR. Effect of gonadotropin at weaning on reproductive performance of primiparous sows. Swine Health Prod 1998, 6:51-5.
131. Armstrong TA, Flowers WL, Britt JH. Control of the weaning-to-estrus interval in sows using gonadotropins and prostaglandins during lactation. J Anim Sci 1999, 77:2533-9.
132. Patterson JL, Cameron AC, Smith TA, Kummer AB, Schott R, Greiner LL, et al. The effect of gonadotrophin treatment at weaning on primiparous sow performance. J Swine Health Prod 2010, 18:196-9.
133. Driancourt MA. Fixed time artificial insemination in gilts and sows. Tools, schedules and efficacy. Soc Reprod Fertil 2013, 68(Suppl):89-99.
134. Zak LJ, Patterson J, Hancock J, Hockley J, Rogan D, Foxcroft GR. Benefits of synchronizing ovulation with porcine luteinizing hormone in a fixed-time insemination protocol in weaned multiparous sows. J Swine Health Prod 2010, 18:125-31.
135. Zak LJ, Patterson J, Hancock J, Rogan D, Foxcroft GR. Benefits of synchronizing ovulation with porcine luteinizing hormone (pLH) in a fixed time insemination protocol in weaned multiparous sows. Soc Reprod Fertil 2009, 66:305-6.
136. Francisco C, Johnston M, Kraeling R, Webel S. Field evaluations using OvuGel® for single fixed-time artificial insemination. AASV 45th Annual Meeting Proceedings 2014, 251-5. 3-1-2014.
137. Knox RV, Taibl JN, Breen SM, Swanson ME, Webel SK. Effects of altering the dose and timing of triptorelin when given as an intravaginal gel for advancing and synchronizing ovulation in weaned sows. Theriogenology 2014, 82:379-86. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.04.020, 24888686.
138. Driancourt MA, Cox P, Rubion S, Harnois-Milon G, Kemp B, Soede NM. Induction of an LH surge and ovulation by buserelin (as Receptal) allows breeding of weaned sows with a single fixed-time insemination. Theriogenology 2013, 80:391-9. 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2013.05.002, 23777891.
139. Flowers WL, Alhusen HD. Reproductive performance and estimates of labor requirements associated with combinations of artificial insemination and natural service in swine. J Anim Sci 1992, 70:615-21.
140. Mickevicius E. Post cervical artificial insemination in sows - what, why, how?. London Swine Conference. A Time for Change 2012, 37-43. 3-28-2010.
141. Willenburg K, Dyck M, Foxcroft G. Tools, techniques and strategies to improve reproductive performance and genetic progress. London Swine Conference Proceedings. A Time for Change. London, Ontario 2012, 9-14. 3-28-2012.
142. Wilson ME. Differences in mating between a boar, traditional artificial insemination, and post cervical insemination. London Swine Conference. A Time for Change 2012, 3-28-2012.
143. Hancock JL. Pig insemination technique. Vet Rec 1959, 71:527.
144. Martinez EA, Vazquez JM, Roca J, Lucas X, Gil MA, Parrilla I, et al. Successful non-surgical deep intrauterine insemination with small numbers of spermatozoa in sows. Reproduction 2001, 122:289-96. 10.1530/rep.0.1220289, 11467980.
145. Martinez EA, Vazquez JM, Roca J, Lucas X, Gil MA, Parrilla I, et al. Minimum number of spermatozoa required for normal fertility after deep intrauterine insemination in non-sedated sows. Reproduction 2002, 123:163-70. 10.1530/rep.0.1230163, 11869198.
146. Mezalira A, Dallanora D, Bernardi M, Wentz I, Bortolozzo FP. Influence of sperm cell dose and post-insemination backflow on reproductive performance of intrauterine inseminated sows. Reprod Domest Anim 2005, 40:1-5. 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2004.00524.x, 15654993.
147. Serret CG, Alvarenga MVF, Coria ALP, Corcini CD, Correa MN, Deschamps JC, et al. Intrauterine artificial insemination of swine with different sperm concentrations, parities, and methods for prediction of ovulation. Anim Reprod 2005, 2:250-6.
148. Sbardella PE, Ulguim RR, Fontana DL, Ferrari CV, Bernardi ML, Wentz I, et al. The post-cervical insemination does not impair the reproductive performance of primiparous sows. Reprod Domest Anim 2014, 49:59-64. 10.1111/rda.12224, 23895197.
149. Flowers WL, Armstrong JD, White SL, Woodward TO, Almond GW. Real-time ultrasonography and pregnancy diagnosis in swine. J Anim Sci 2000, 77:1-7.
150. Kirkden RD, Broom DM, Andersen IL. Piglet mortality: the impact of induction of farrowing using prostaglandins and oxytocin. Anim Reprod Sci 2013, 138:14-24. 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2013.02.009, 23489471.
151. Webel S, Johnston MF, Francisco CK, Kraeling R. Sow reproductive performance using Triptorelin Gel and fixed-time AI in commercial swine farms. 23rd International Pig Veterinary Society Congress 2014, 136. 6-8-2014.
152. Johnston ME. Personal communication 2014,