The post-cervical insemination does not impair the reproductive performance of primiparous sows

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 59-64

  Sbardella, P E ^a   Ulguim, R R ^a   Fontana, D L ^a   Ferrari, C V ^a   Bernardi, M L ^a   Wentz, I ^a   Bortolozzo, F P ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SUIDAE;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; ESTRUS; FEMALE; LITTER SIZE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PARITY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; REPRODUCTION; SPERMATOZOON COUNT; SWINE; UTERINE CERVIX;

ANIMALS; CERVIX UTERI; ESTRUS DETECTION; FEMALE; INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL; LITTER SIZE; MALE; PARITY; PREGNANCY; REPRODUCTION; SPERM COUNT; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 84892503978     PISSN: 09366768     EISSN: 14390531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/rda.12224     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bennemann PE, Milbradt E, Diehl GN, Weber D, Schimidt ACT, Bernardi ML, Wentz I, Bortolozzo FP, 2004: Reproductive performance of sows submitted to intrauterine insemination at different pre-ovulatory intervals. Anim Reprod 1, 106-110.
2. Bennemann PE, Koller FL, Bernardi ML, Wentz I, Bortolozzo FP, 2005: Desempenho reprodutivo de fêmeas suínas submetidas à inseminação artificial intra-uterina ou à tradicional. Ciência Rural 35, 1735-1739.
3. Dallanora D, Mezalira A, Katzer LH, Bernardi ML, Bortolozzo FP, Wentz I, 2004: Desempenho reprodutivo de fêmeas suínas inseminadas pela técnica intra-uterina ou tradicional. Pesq Agrop Bras 39, 815-819.
4. Diehl GN, Amaral Filha WS, Kummer R, Koller F, Bernardi ML, Wentz I, Bortolozzo FP, 2006: Nova pipeta para inseminação intra-uterina em suínos. Ciência Rural 36, 179-185.
5. Hernández-Caravaca I, Izquierdo-Rico MJ, Matás C, Carvajal JA, Vieira L, Abril D, Soriano-Úbeda C, García-Váquez FA, 2012: Reproductive performance and backflow study in cervical and post-cervical artificial insemination in sows. Anim Reprod Sci 136, 14-22.
6. Hoving LL, Soede NM, Feitsma H, Kemp B, 2012: Lactation weight loss in primiparous sows: consequences for embryo survival and progesterone and relations with metabolic profiles. Reprod Dom Anim 47, 1009-1016.
7. Langendijk P, Bouwman EG, Schams D, Soede NM, Kemp B, 2003: Effects of different sexual stimuli on oxytocin release, uterine activity and receptive behavior in estrous sows. Theriogenology 59, 849-861.
8. Martinez EA, Vazquez JM, Roca J, Lucas X, Gil MA, Parrilla I, Vasquez JL, Day BN, 2001: Successful non-surgical deep intrauterine insemination with small numbers of spermatozoa in sows. Reprod 122, 289-296.
9. Martinez EA, Vazquez JM, Roca J, Lucas X, Gil MA, Parrilla I, Vazquez JL, Day BN, 2002: Minimum number of spermatozoa required for normal fertility after deep intrauterine insemination in non-sedated sows. Reproduction 123, 163-170.
10. Mezalira A, Dallanora D, Bernardi ML, Wentz I, Bortolozzo FP, 2005: Influence of sperm cell dose and post-insemination backflow on reproductive performance of intrauterine inseminated sows. Reprod Dom Anim 40, 1-5.
11. Roberts PK, Bilkei G, 2005: Field experiences on post-cervical artificial insemination in the sow. Reprod Dom Anim 40, 489-491.
12. Roca J, Carvajal G, Lucas X, Vazquez JM, Martinez EA, 2003:Fertility of weaned sows after deep intrauterine insemination with a reduced number of frozen-thawed spermatozoa. Theriogenology 60, 77-87.
13. Rozeboom KJ, Reicks DL, Wilson ME, 2004: The reproductive performance and factors affecting on-farm application of low-dose intrauterine deposit of semen in sows. J Anim Sci 82, 2164-2168.
14. Serret CG, Alvarenga MVF, Cória ALP, Dias CP, Corcini CD, Corrêa MN, Deschamps JC, Bianchi I, Lucia T Jr, 2005: Intrauterine artificial insemination of swine with different sperm concentrations, parities, and methods for prediction of ovulation. Anim Reprod 2, 250-256.
15. Soede NM, Wetzels CCH, Zondag W, Koning MAI, Kemp B, 1995: Effects of time of insemination relative to ovulation, as determined by ultrasonography, on fertilization rate and accessory sperm count in sows. J Reprod Fertil 104, 99-106.
16. Steverink DWB, Soede NM, Bouwman EG, Kemp B, 1998: Semen backflow after insemination and its effect on fertilisation results in sows. Anim Reprod Sci 54, 109-119.
17. Thaker MYC, Bilkei G, 2005: Lactation weight loss influences subsequent reproductive performance of sows. Anim Reprod Sci 88, 309-318.
18. Vazquez JM, Martinez EA, Parrilla I, Roca J, Gil MA, Vazquez JL, 2003: Birth of piglets after deep intrauterine insemination with flow cytometrically sorted boar spermatozoa. Theriogenology 59, 1605-1614.
19. Vinsky M, Novak S, Dixon WT, Dyck MK, Foxcroft GR, 2006: Nutritional restriction in lactating primiparous sows selectively affects female embryo survival and overall litter development. Reprod Fertil Dev 18, 347-355.
20. Watson PF, Behan JR, 2002: Intrauterine insemination of sows with reduced sperm numbers: results of a commercially based field trial. Theriogenology 57, 1683-1693.
21. Willenburg KL, Miller GM, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Knox RV, 2003: Effect of boar exposure at time of insemination on factors influencing fertility in gilts. J Anim Sci 81, 9-15.
22. Young MG, Tokach MD, Aherne FX, Main RG, Dritz SS, Goodband RD, Nelssen JL, 2004: Comparison of three methods of feeding sows in gestation and the subsequent effects on lactation performance. J Anim Sci 82, 3058-3070.
23. Zak LJ, Xu X, Hardin RT, Foxcroft GR, 1997: Impact of different patterns of feed intake during lactation in the primiparous sow on follicular development and oocyte maturation. J Reprod Fert 110, 99-106.