Tissue mechanics and adhesion during embryo development

Developmental Biology

Volumn 401, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 152-164

  Shawky, Joseph H ^a   Davidson, Lance A ^a,b  

^a University of Pittsburgh   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adhesion energy; Binding energy; Elastic modulus; Morphogenesis; Stiffness; Surface tension

Indexed keywords

CADHERIN; CELL SURFACE PROTEIN; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; UVOMORULIN;

ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL AGGREGATION; CELL POLARITY; CELL POPULATION; CELL STRESS; CELLS BY BODY ANATOMY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; TISSUE ADHESION; TISSUE STRUCTURE; VISCOSITY; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICS; BIOPHYSICS; CELL COMMUNICATION; MORPHOGENESIS; PHYSIOLOGY; TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; BIOPHYSICS; CELL ADHESION; CELL COMMUNICATION; CELLULAR MICROENVIRONMENT; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MORPHOGENESIS;

EID: 84927972905     PISSN: 00121606     EISSN: 1095564X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.12.005     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Aliee M., Röper J.-C., Landsberg K.P., Pentzold C., Widmann T.J., Jülicher F., Dahmann C. Physical mechanisms shaping the Drosophila dorsoventral compartment boundary. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:967-976.
2. Bayas M.V., Leung A., Evans E., Leckband D. Lifetime measurements reveal kinetic differences between homophilic cadherin bonds. Biophys. J. 2006, 90:1385-1395.
3. Beaune G., Stirbat T.V., Khalifat N., Cochet-Escartin O., Garcia S., Gurchenkov V.V., Murrell M.P., Dufour S., Cuvelier D., Brochard-Wyart F. How cells flow in the spreading of cellular aggregates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111:8055-8060.
4. Bhadriraju K., Yang M., Alom Ruiz S., Pirone D., Tan J., Chen C.S. Activation of ROCK by RhoA is regulated by cell adhesion, shape, and cytoskeletal tension. Exp. Cell Res. 2007, 313:3616-3623.
5. Borghi N., Sorokina M., Shcherbakova O.G., Weis W.I., Pruitt B.L., Nelson W.J., Dunn A.R. E-cadherin is under constitutive actomyosin-generated tension that is increased at cell-cell contacts upon externally applied stretch. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109:12568-12573.
6. Brodland G.W. The Differential Interfacial Tension Hypothesis (DITH): a comprehensive theory for the self-rearrangement of embryonic cells and tissues. J. Biomech. Eng. 2002, 124:188-197.
7. Campbell I.D., Humphries M.J. Integrin structure, activation, and interactions. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3:aa004994.
8. Chien Y.H., Jiang N., Li F., Zhang F., Zhu C., Leckband D. Two stage cadherin kinetics require multiple extracellular domains but not the cytoplasmic region. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:1848-1856.
9. Conway D.E., Breckenridge M.T., Hinde E., Gratton E., Chen C.S., Schwartz M.A. Fluid shear stress on endothelial cells modulates mechanical tension across VE-cadherin and PECAM-1. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23:1024-1030.
10. Cooke J., Zeeman E.C. A clock and wavefront model for control of the number of repeated structures during animal morphogenesis. J. Theor. Biol. 1976, 58:455-476.
11. David R., Luu O., Damm E.W., Wen J.W., Nagel M., Winklbauer R. Tissue cohesion and the mechanics of cell rearrangement. Development 2014, 141:3672-3682.
12. Davidson L.A., Dzamba B.D., Keller R., Desimone D.W. Live imaging of cell protrusive activity, and extracellular matrix assembly and remodeling during morphogenesis in the frog, Xenopus laevis. Dev. Dyn. 2008, 237:2684-2692.
13. Davidson L.A., Hoffstrom B.G., Keller R., DeSimone D.W. Mesendoderm extension and mantle closure in Xenopus laevis gastrulation: combined roles for integrin alpha5beta1, fibronectin, and tissue geometry. Dev. Biol. 2002, 242:109-129.
14. Dias A.S., de Almeida I., Belmonte J.M., Glazier J.A., Stern C.D. Somites without a clock. Science 2014, 343:791-795.
15. Douezan S., Guevorkian K., Naouar R., Dufour S., Cuvelier D., Brochard-Wyart F. Spreading dynamics and wetting transition of cellular aggregates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108:7315-7320.
16. Dray N., Lawton A., Nandi A., Julich D., Emonet T., Holley S.A. Cell-fibronectin interactions propel vertebrate trunk elongation via tissue mechanics. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23:1335-1341.
17. Dubrulle J., McGrew M.J., Pourquie O. FGF signaling controls somite boundary position and regulates segmentation clock control of spatiotemporal Hox gene activation. Cell 2001, 106:219-232.
18. Fagotto F., Rohani N., Touret A.S., Li R. A molecular base for cell sorting at embryonic boundaries: contact inhibition of cadherin adhesion by ephrin/Eph-dependent contractility. Dev. Cell 2013, 27:72-87.
19. Farhadifar R., Roper J.C., Aigouy B., Eaton S., Julicher F. The influence of cell mechanics, cell-cell interactions, and proliferation on epithelial packing. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:2095-2104.
20. Foty R.A., Forgacs G., Pfleger C.M., Steinberg M.S. Liquid properties of embryonic tissues: measurement of interfacial tensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1994, 72:2298-2301.
21. Foty R.A., Pfleger C.M., Forgacs G., Steinberg M.S. Surface tensions of embryonic tissues predict their mutual envelopment behavior. Development 1996, 122:1611-1620.
22. Foty R.A., Steinberg M.S. The differential adhesion hypothesis: a direct evaluation. Dev. Biol. 2005, 278:255-263.
23. Gardel M.L., Schneider I.C., Aratyn-Schaus Y., Waterman C.M. Mechanical integration of actin and adhesion dynamics in cell migration. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2010, 26:315-333.
24. Glazier J.A., Graner F. Simulation of the differential adhesion driven rearrangement of biological cells. Phys. Rev. E, Stat. Phys., Plasmas, Fluids, Relat. Interdiscip. Top. 1993, 47:2128-2154.
25. Grashoff C., Hoffman B.D., Brenner M.D., Zhou R., Parsons M., Yang M.T., McLean M.A., Sligar S.G., Chen C.S., Ha T. Measuring mechanical tension across vinculin reveals regulation of focal adhesion dynamics. Nature 2010, 466:263-266.
26. Harris A.K. Is cell sorting caused by differences in the work of intercellular adhesion? A critique of the Steinberg hypothesis. J. Theor. Biol. 1976, 61:267-285.
27. Hayashi T., Carthew R.W. Surface mechanics mediate pattern formation in the developing retina. Nature 2004, 431:647-652.
28. Hilgenfeldt S., Erisken S., Carthew R.W. Physical modeling of cell geometric order in an epithelial tissue. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105:907-911.
29. Huveneers S., Danen E.H. Adhesion signaling-crosstalk between integrins, Src and Rho. J. Cell Sci. 2009, 122:1059-1069.
30. Kafer J., Hayashi T., Maree A.F., Carthew R.W., Graner F. Cell adhesion and cortex contractility determine cell patterning in the Drosophila retina. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:18549-18554.
31. Kalantarian A., Ninomiya H., Saad S.M., David R., Winklbauer R., Neumann A.W. Axisymmetric drop shape analysis for estimating the surface tension of cell aggregates by centrifugation. Biophys. J. 2009, 96:1606-1616.
32. Kasza K.E., Zallen J.A. Dynamics and regulation of contractile actin-myosin networks in morphogenesis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2011, 23:30-38.
33. Kovacs E.M., Verma S., Ali R.G., Ratheesh A., Hamilton N.A., Akhmanova A., Yap A.S. N-WASP regulates the epithelial junctional actin cytoskeleton through a non-canonical post-nucleation pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:934-943.
34. Krieg M., Arboleda-Estudillo Y., Puech P.H., Kafer J., Graner F., Muller D.J., Heisenberg C.P. Tensile forces govern germ-layer organization in zebrafish. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10:429-436.
35. Lawton A.K., Nandi A., Stulberg M.J., Dray N., Sneddon M.W., Pontius W., Emonet T., Holley S.A. Regulated tissue fluidity steers zebrafish body elongation. Development 2013, 140:573-582.
36. Leckband D., Prakasam A. Mechanism and dynamics of cadherin adhesion. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2006, 8:259-287.
37. Leckband D., Sivasankar S. Mechanism of homophilic cadherin adhesion. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2000, 12:587-592.
38. Levayer R., Lecuit T. Oscillation and polarity of E-cadherin asymmetries control actomyosin flow patterns during morphogenesis. Dev. Cell 2013, 26:162-175.
39. Litvinov R.I., Shuman H., Bennett J.S., Weisel J.W. Binding strength and activation state of single fibrinogen-integrin pairs on living cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99:7426-7431.
40. Liu Z., Tan J.L., Cohen D.M., Yang M.T., Sniadecki N.J., Ruiz S.A., Nelson C.M., Chen C.S. Mechanical tugging force regulates the size of cell-cell junctions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107:9944-9949.
41. Loring J.F., Erickson C.A. Neural crest cell migratory pathways in the trunk of the chick embryo. Dev. Biol. 1987, 121:220-236.
42. Maitre J.L., Berthoumieux H., Krens S.F., Salbreux G., Julicher F., Paluch E., Heisenberg C.P. Adhesion functions in cell sorting by mechanically coupling the cortices of adhering cells. Science 2012, 338:253-256.
43. Manning M.L., Foty R.A., Steinberg M.S., Schoetz E.M. Coaction of intercellular adhesion and cortical tension specifies tissue surface tension. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107:12517-12522.
44. Maruthamuthu V., Aratyn-Schaus Y., Gardel M.L. Conserved F-actin dynamics and force transmission at cell adhesions. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2010, 22:583-588.
45. Maruthamuthu V., Sabass B., Schwarz U.S., Gardel M.L. Cell-ECM traction force modulates endogenous tension at cell-cell contacts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108:4708-4713.
46. Ninomiya H., David R., Damm E.W., Fagotto F., Niessen C.M., Winklbauer R. Cadherin-dependent differential cell adhesion in Xenopus causes cell sorting in vitro but not in the embryo. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125:1877-1883.
47. Papan C., Camposortega J.A. On the formation of the neural keel and neural-tube in the zebrafish Danio (Brachydanio) rerio. Roux's Arch. Dev. Biol. 1994, 203:178-186.
48. Parsons J.T., Horwitz A.R., Schwartz M.A. Cell adhesion: integrating cytoskeletal dynamics and cellular tension. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:633-643.
49. Perret E., Leung A., Feracci H., Evans E. Trans-bonded pairs of E-cadherin exhibit a remarkable hierarchy of mechanical strengths. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101:16472-16477.
50. Prakasam A.K., Maruthamuthu V., Leckband D.E. Similarities between heterophilic and homophilic cadherin adhesion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103:15434-15439.
51. Puech P.H., Taubenberger A., Ulrich F., Krieg M., Muller D.J., Heisenberg C.P. Measuring cell adhesion forces of primary gastrulating cells from zebrafish using atomic force microscopy. J. Cell Sci. 2005, 118:4199-4206.
52. Rozario T., Dzamba B., Weber G.F., Davidson L.A., DeSimone D.W. The physical state of fibronectin matrix differentially regulates morphogenetic movements in vivo. Dev. Biol. 2009, 327:386-398.
53. Saeger J., Hytonen V.P., Klotzsch E., Vogel V. GFP[U+05F3]s mechanical intermediate states. PLoS One 2012, 7:e46962.
54. Shewan A.M., Maddugoda M., Kraemer A., Stehbens S.J., Verma S., Kovacs E.M., Yap A.S. Myosin 2 is a key Rho kinase target necessary for the local concentration of E-cadherin at cell-cell contacts. Mol. Biol. Cell 2005, 16:4531-4542.
55. Sivasankar S., Brieher W., Lavrik N., Gumbiner B., Leckband D. Direct molecular force measurements of multiple adhesive interactions between cadherin ectodomains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96:11820-11824.
56. Staple D., Farhadifar R., Röper J.-C., Aigouy B., Eaton S., Jülicher F. Mechanics and remodelling of cell packings in epithelia. Eur. Phys. J. E: Soft Matter Biol. Phys. 2010, 33:117-127.
57. Steinberg M.S. Reconstruction of tissues by dissociated cells. Some morphogenetic tissue movements and the sorting out of embryonic cells may have a common explanation. Science 1963, 141:401-408.
58. Steinberg M.S., Takeichi M. Experimental specification of cell sorting, tissue spreading, and specific spatial patterning by quantitative differences in cadherin expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91:206-209.
59. Stemple D.L. Structure and function of the notochord: an essential organ for chordate development. Development 2005, 132:2503-2512.
60. Townes P.L., Holtfreter J. Directed movements and selective adhesion of embryonic amphibian cells. J. Exp. Zool. 1955, 128:53-120.
61. Valiev R.Z., Krasilnikov N., Tsenev N. Plastic deformation of alloys with submicron-grained structure. Mater. Sci. Eng.: A 1991, 137:35-40.
62. Weber G.F., Bjerke M.A., DeSimone D.W. Integrins and cadherins join forces to form adhesive networks. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124:1183-1193.
63. Wilson H.V. On some phenomena of coalescence and regeneration in sponges. J. Exp. Zool. 1907, 5:245-258.
64. Winklbauer R. Mesodermal cell migration during Xenopus gastrulation. Dev. Biol. 1990, 142:155-168.
65. Zajac M., Jones G.L., Glazier J.A. Model of convergent extension in animal morphogenesis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 85:2022-2025.
66. Zhang Y.X., Sivasankar S., Nelson W.J., Chu S. Resolving cadherin interactions and binding cooperativity at the single-molecule level. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:109-114.
67. Zhou J., Kim H.Y., Davidson L.A. Actomyosin stiffens the vertebrate embryo during critical stages of elongation and neural tube closure. Development 2009, 136:677-688.
68. Zhu C., Bao G., Wang N. Cell mechanics: mechanical response, cell adhesion, and molecular deformation. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2000, 2:189-226.