Becoming disabled: The association between disability onset in younger adults and subsequent changes in productive engagement, social support, financial hardship and subjective wellbeing

Disability and Health Journal

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 448-456

  Emerson, Eric ^a   Kariuki, Maina ^a   Honey, Anne ^a   Llewellyn, Gwynnyth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Employment; Onset of disability; Social inclusion; Well being

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIAN; DISABILITY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EMPLOYMENT; FINANCIAL DEFICIT; HUMAN; INCOME; LANGUAGE ABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; ONSET AGE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; SOCIAL SUPPORT; WELLBEING; YOUNG ADULT; AGE; DISABLED PERSON; FEMALE; LANGUAGE; MIGRANT; PARENT; PROGNOSIS; SATISFACTION; SEX DIFFERENCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EMIGRANTS AND IMMIGRANTS; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCOME; LANGUAGE; MALE; PARENTS; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; PROGNOSIS; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL SUPPORT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84927968608     PISSN: 19366574     EISSN: 18767583     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities. New York: United Nations; 2006.
2. Mont D. Measuring Disability Prevalence. Washington, DC, USA: The World Bank; 2007.
3. Bajekal M, Harries T, Breman R, Woodfield K. Review of Disability Estimates and Definitions. London: HMSO; 2004.
4. World Health Organization and the World Bank. World Report on Disability. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
5. Thomas C. Sociologies of Disability and Illness. Contested Ideas in Disability Studies and Medical Sociology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2007.
6. Shakespeare T. Disability Rights and Wrongs. London: Routledge; 2006.
7. Barnes C. Understanding the social model of disability: past, present and future. In: Watson N, Roulstone A, Thomas C, eds. Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies. Abingdon: Routledge; 2012: 12-29.
8. United Nations. Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities of Persons With Disabilities. New York; 2003.
9. Watson N, Thomas C, Roulstone A, eds. Routledge Companion to Disability Studies. London: Routledge; 2012.
10. National Equality Panel. An Anatomy of Economic Inequality in the UK. London: Government Equalities Office; 2010.
11. Cabinet Office. Getting on, Getting Ahead: A Discussion Paper: Analysing the Trends and Drivers of Social Mobility. London: Cabinet Office; 2008.
12. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Health of Australians With Disability: Health Status and Risk Factors. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2010.
13. Lucas RE. Long-term disability is associated with lasting changes in subjective well-being: evidence from two nationally representative longitudinal studies. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007;92(4):717-730.
14. Kariuki M, Honey A, Emerson E, Llewellyn G. Mental health trajectories of young people after disability onset. Disabil Health J. 2011;4:91-101.
15. Mandemakers JJ, Monden CWS. Does education buffer the impact of disability on psychological distress? Soc Sci Med. 2010;71:288-297.
16. Burchardt T. Being and Becoming: Social Exclusion and the Onset of Disability. Case Report 21. London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics; 2003.
17. Oswald AJ, Powdthavee N. Does happiness adapt? A longitudinal study of disability with implications for economists and judges. J Public Econ. 2008;92:1061-1077.
18. Powdthavee N. What happens to people before and after disability? Focusing effects, lead effects, and adaptation in different areas of life. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69:1834-1844.
19. Jenkins SP, Rigg JA. Disability and disadvantage: selection, onset and duration effects. J Soc Policy. 2004;33(3):479-501.
20. Gannon B, Nolan B. The Dynamics of Disability and Social Inclusion in Ireland. Dublin: The Economic and Social Research Institute; 2006.
21. Lucas RE. Adaptation and the set-point model of subjective well-being. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2007;16(2):75-79.
22. UNICEF. The State of the World's Children 2011: Adolescence e an Age of Opportunity. New York: UNICEF; 2011.
23. HILDA. [Cited 2012 6th February]; Available from: http://melbourne institute.com/hilda/.
24. Summerfield M, Dunn R, Freidin S, et al. HILDA User Manual e Release 10. Melbourne: Univeristy of Melbourne; 2011.
25. Li F, Duncan TE, Duncan SC, Acock A. Latent growth modeling of longitudinal data: a finite growth mixture modeling approach. Struct Equ Modeling. 2001;8(4):493-530.
26. Chen J, Shao J. Nearest neighbor imputation for survey data. J Official Statistics. 2000;16:113-131.
27. Jonsson P, Wohlin C, eds. An Evaluation of K-nearest Neighbour Imputation Using Likert Data. 10th International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS'04); 2004. Chicago, IL.
28. Ward SJ. Variations in Student Development Trajectories in Reading and Mathematics: A Multilevel Growth Mixture Model Approach. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University; 2007.
29. Nagin D. Analyzing developmental trajectories: a semiparametric, group-based approach. Psychol Methods. 1999;4:139-157.
30. Willett JB, Singer JD, Martin NC. The design and analysis of longitudinal studies of development and psychopathology in context: statistical models and methodological recommendations. Dev Psychopathol. 1998;10:395-426.
31. Muthén LK, Muthén B. Mplus: User's Guide. 5th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 2007.
32. Nagin D. Group-based Modeling of Development. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press; 2005.
33. Yang CC. Finite Mixture Model Selection With Psychometric Application. Los Angeles: University of California; 1998.
34. Hix-Small H, Duncan TE, Duncan SC, Okut H. A multivariate associative finite growth mixture modeling approach examining adolescent alcohol and marijuana use. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2004;26(4):255-270.
35. McLachlan GJ, Peel D. Finite Mixture Models. New York: Wiley; 2000.
36. Nylund KL, Asparouhov T, Muthén BO. Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Struct Equ Modeling. 2007;14(4):535-569.
37. Muthén B, ed. Latent Variable Analysis: Growth Mixture Modeling and Related Techniques for Longitudinal Data. Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage; 2004.
38. Rindskopf D. Mixture or homogeneous? Comment on Bauer and Curran (2003). Psychol Methods. 2003;8:364-368.
39. Lacourse E, Nagin D, Tremblay RE, Vitaro F, Claes M. Developmental trajectories of boys delinquent group membership and facilitation of violent behaviors during adolescence. Dev Psychopathol. 2003;15(1):183-197.
40. Growth Mixture Modeling of Adolescent Alcohol Use Data [Database on the Internet]. Oregon Research Institute; 2002 [Cited July 2009].
41. Croudace TJ, Jarvelin M, Wadsworth MEJ, Jones PB. Development typology of trajectories to nighttime bladder control: epidemiological application of longitudinal latent class analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157:834-842.
42. Watson N, Wooden M. Sample attrition in the HILDA survey. Australian J Lab Econ. 2004;7:293-308.
43. Barbotte E, Guillemin F, Chau N. Prevalence of impairments, disabilities, handicaps and quality of life in the general population: a review of recent literature. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79:1047-1055.
44. Benítez-Silva H, Buchinsky M, Chan HM, Cheidvasser S, Rust J. How large is the bias in self-reported disability. J Appl Econ. 2004;19:649-670.
45. d'Addio AC. Intergenerational Transmission of Disadvantage: Mobility or Immobility Across Generations?. Geneva: OECD; 2007.
46. Machin SJ. Childhood disadvantage and intergenerational transmissions of economic status. In: Persistent Poverty and Lifetime Inequality: The Evidence: Proceedings From a Workshop Held at HM Treasury. London: CASE, LSE/HM Treasury; 1999:17-21.
47. Vinson T. Intergenerational Disadvantage. Canberra: Australian Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations; 2009.