A multivariate associative finite growth mixture modeling approach examining adolescent alcohol and marijuana use

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 255-270

  Hix Small, Hollie ^a   Duncan, Terry E ^a   Duncan, Susan C ^a   Okut, Hayrettin ^a  

^a OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

associative Latent Growth Model; Growth Generalized Mixture Modeling; Parallel Process Growth Model; substance use development

Indexed keywords

CANNABIS;

ADOLESCENT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DRUG ABUSE; FEMALE; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 7044250730     PISSN: 08822689     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:JOBA.0000045341.56296.fa     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Anthony, J. C., & Petronis, K. R. (1995). Early-onset drug use and risk of later drug problems. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 40, 9-15.
2. Bates, M. E. & Labouvie, E. W. (1997). Adolescent risk factors and the prediction of persistent alcohol and drug use into adulthood. Alcohol Clinical Experimental Research, 21, 944-950.
3. Bukstein, O. G. (1995). Adolescent substance abuse: Assessment, prevention and treatment. New York: Wiley.
4. Collins, L., & Sayer, A. (2001). New methods for the analysis of change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
5. Coombs, R. H., Paulson, M. J., & Richardson, M. A. (1991). Peer vs. parental influence in substance use among Hispanic and Anglo children and adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 20, 73-88.
6. Costello, E. J., Erkanli, A., Federman, E., & Angold, A. (1999). Development of psychiatric comorbidity with substance abuse in adolescents: Effects of timing and sex. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 28, 298-311.
7. Donovan, J. E. (1996). Problem-behavior theory and the explanation of adolescent marijuana use. Journal of Drug Issues, 26, 379-404.
8. Donovan, J. E., & Jessor, R. (1985). Structure of problem behavior in adolescence and young adulthood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 890-904.
9. Donovan, J. E., Jessor, R., & Costa, F. M. (1988). Syndrome of problem behavior in adolescence: A replication. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 762-765.
10. Duncan, S. C., & Duncan, T. E. (1994). Modeling incomplete longitudinal substance use data using latent variable growth curve methodology. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 313-338.
11. Duncan, S. C., & Duncan, T. E. (1996). A multivariate latent growth curve analysis of adolescent substance use. Structural Equation Modeling, 3, 323-347.
12. Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., & Hops, H. (1994). The effects of family cohesiveness and peer encouragement on the development of adolescent alcohol use: A cohort-sequential approach to the analysis of longitudinal data. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 55, 588-599.
13. Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., & Hops, H. (1996). The role of parents and older siblings in predicting adolescent substance use: Modeling development via structural equation latent growth curve methodology. Journal of Family Psychology, 10(2), 158-172.
14. Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., Strycker, L. A., Li, F., & Alpert, A. (1999). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Duncan, T. E., Susan, S. C., Strycker, L. A., Okut, H., & Li, F. (2002). Growth mixture modeling of adolescent alcohol use data. Retrieved from Oregon Research Institute Web site: http://www.ori.org/methodology
16. Elder, G. H. (1980). Family structure and socialization. New York: Arno Press.
17. Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Menard, S. (1989). Multiple problem youth: Delinquency, substance use, and mental health problems. New York: Springer-Verlag.
18. Farrell, A. D., Danish, S. J., & Howard, C. W. (1992). Relationship between drug use and other problem behaviors in urban adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 705-712.
19. Hanna, E. Z., & Grant, B. F. (1999). Parallels to early onset alcohol use in the relationship of early onset smoking with drug use and DSM-IV drug and depressive disorders: Findings from the National Longitudinal Epidemiologic Survey. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 23, 513-522.
20. Hansen, W. B., Graham, J. W., Sobel, J. L., Shelton, D. R., Flay, B. R., & Johnson, C. A. (1987). The consistency of peer and parent influences on tobacco, alcohol, and marijuana use among young adolescents. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 10, 559-579.
21. Hawkins, J., Catalano, R., & Miller, J. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 64-105.
22. Hops, H., Duncan, T. E., & Duncan, S. C. (1996). Parent substance use as a predictor of adolescent use: A six-year lagged analysis. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 18(3), 157-164.
23. Jessor, R. (1987). Problem-behavior theory, psychosocial development, and adolescent problem drinking. British Journal of Addiction, 82, 331-342.
24. Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. (1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development. New York: Academic Press.
25. Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., & Bachman, J. G. (1996). National survey results on drug use from the Monitoring the Future Study, 1975-1995. Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
26. Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., & Bachman, J. G. (2002). Monitoring the Future national results on adolescent drug use. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
27. Kandel, D. B. (1985). On processes of peer influences in adolescent drug use: A developmental perspective. Advances in Alcohol and Substance Abuse, 4, 139-163.
28. Li, F., Duncan, T. E., & Hops, H. (2001). Examining developmental trajectories in adolescent alcohol use using piecewise growth mixture modeling analysis. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62, 199-210.
29. Lo, Y., Mendell, N., & Rubin, D. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767-778.
30. Loeber, R. (1988). Natural histories of conduct problems, delinquency, and associated substance use: Evidence for developmental progressions. In B. B. Lahey, & A. E. Kazdin, (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology (pp. 73-124). New York: Plenum Press.
31. McArdle, J. J. (1988). Dynamic but structural equation modeling of repeated measures data. In R. B. Cattel & J. Nesselroade (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (2nd ed., pp. 561-614). New York: Plenum Press.
32. McArdle, J. J., & Epstein, D. (1987). Latent growth curves within developmental structural equation models. Child Development, 58, 110-133.
33. McArdle, J. J., & Hamagami, F. (1991). Modeling incomplete longitudinal and cross-sectional data using latent growth structural models. In L. M. Collins & J. C. Horn (Eds.), Best methods for the analysis of change (pp. 276-304). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
34. Meredith, W., & Tisak, J. (1990). Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika, 55, 107-122.
35. Muthén, B. (2000). Methodological issues in random coefficient growth modeling using a latent variable framework: Applications to the development of heavy drinking. In J. Rose, L. Chassin, C. Presson, & J. Sherman (Eds.), Multivariate applications in substance use research (pp. 113-140). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Muthén, B. O. (2001). Second-generation structural equation modeling with combination of categorical and continuous latent variables: New opportunities for latent class/latent growth modeling. In L. M. Collins & A. G. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis for change (pp. 291-322). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
37. Muthén, B., Brown, C. H., Khoo, S., Yang, C., & Jo, B. (1998). General growth mixture modeling of latent trajectory classes: Perspectives and prospects. Paper presented at the meeting of the Prevention Science and Methodology Group, Tempe, AZ.
38. Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. K. (2000). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 24, 882-891.
39. Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B. (1998). Mplus: User's guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
40. Muthén, B., & Shedden, K. (1999). Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm. Biometrics, 55, 463-469.
41. Nagin, D. S. (1999). Analyzing developmental trajectories: A semi-parametric, group-based approach. Psychological Methods, 4, 139-157.
42. Nagin, D., & Tremblay, R. E. (1999). Trajectories of boys' physical aggression, opposition, and hyperactivity on the path to physically violent and nonviolent juvenile delinquency. Child Development, 70, 1181-1196.
43. Osgood, D. W., Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., & Bachman, J. G. (1988). The generality of deviance in late adolescence and early adulthood. American Sociology Review, 53, 81-93.
44. Patterson, G. R., & Dishion, T. J. (1985). Contributions of families and peers to delinquency. Criminology, 23, 63-79.
45. Ramaswamy, V., DeSarbo, W., Reibstein, D., & Robinson, W. (1993). An empirical pooling approach for estimating marketing mix elasticities with PIMS data. Marketing Science, 12, 103-124.
46. Schafer, J. L. (1994). Multivariate normal multiple imputation algorithms. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania State University, Department of Statistics.
47. Schulenberg, J., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., Wadsworth, K. N., & Johnston, L. D. ( 1996). Getting drunk and growing up: Trajectories of frequent binge drinking during the transition to young adulthood. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 57, 289-304.
48. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (1998). Preliminary results from the 1997 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (Publication No. (SMA) 98-3251). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
49. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1993). Eighth Special Report to the US Congress on Alcohol and Health. Rockville, MD: Author.
50. Wang, P., Puterman, M., & Cockburn, I. (1998). Analysis of patent data: A mixed poisson regression model approach. Journal of Business Economic Statistics, 16(1), 27-41.
51. Willett, J. B., & Sayer, A. G. (1994). Using covariance structure analysis to detect correlates and predictors of individual change over time. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 363-381.
52. Yang, C. C. (1998). Finite mixture model selection with psychometric applications. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
53. Zucker, R. A. (1994). Pathways to alcohol problems and alcoholism: A developmental account of the evidence for multiple alcoholism and for contextual contributions to risk. In R. A. Zuker, J. Howard, and G. M. Boyd (Eds.), The development of alcohol problems: Exploring the biopsychosocial matrix of risk (pp. 255-289). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
54. Zucker, R. A., Fitzgerald, H. E., & Moses, H. D. (1995). Emergence of alcohol problems and the several alcoholisms: A developmental perspective on etiologic theory and life course trajectory. In D. Cicchetti & D.J. Cohen (Eds.), Development psychopathology: Risk, disorder, and adaptation (Vol. 2, pp. 677-711). New York: Wiley.