Assessing nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for the detoxification of lignocellulosic hydrolysates

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 487, Issue , 2015, Pages 40-50

  Nguyen, N ^a,b,c   Fargues, C ^a,b   Guiga, W ^a,b   Lameloise, M L ^a,b  

^a UMR SayFood   (France)

^b University of Paris Cité   (France)

^c University Bien Hoa   (Viet Nam)

Author keywords

Detoxification; Inhibitor; Lignocellulosic hydrolysate; Nanofiltration; Reverse osmosis

Indexed keywords

ALDEHYDES; DETOXIFICATION; FURFURAL; NANOFILTRATION; REVERSE OSMOSIS; SUGARS; TOXIC MATERIALS;

ETHANOL PRODUCTION; HIGH VOLUMES; INHIBITOR; LIGNOCELLULOSIC HYDROLYSATES; LIGNOCELLULOSIC MATERIAL; LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT; MODEL SOLUTION; PERMEATE FLUX;

OSMOSIS MEMBRANES;

5 HYDROXYMETHYL FURFURAL; ACETIC ACID; ARABINOSE; FURFURAL; GLUCOSE; SUGAR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VANILLIN; XYLOSE;

ARTICLE; DETOXIFICATION; HYDROLYSIS; MEMBRANE; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NANOFILTRATION; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REDUCTION; REVERSE OSMOSIS; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; WATER PERMEABILITY;

EID: 84927931575     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.072     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Palmqvist E., Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: Inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 74:25-33.
2. Mussatto S., Roberto I. Alternatives for detoxification of diluted-acid lignocellulosic hydrolyzates for use in fermentative processes: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2004, 93:1-10.
3. Huang H.J., Ramaswamy S., Tschirner U.W., Ramarao B.V. A review of separation technologies in current and future biorefineries. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 62:1-21.
4. Pienkos P.T., Zhang M. Role of pretreatment and conditioning processes on toxicity of lignocellulosic biomasse hydrolysates. Cellulose 2009, 16(4):743-762.
5. Abels C., Carstensen F., Wessling M. Membrane processes in biorefinery applications. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 444:285-317.
6. Franden M.A, Pilath H.M., Mohagheghi A., Pienkos P.T., Zhang M. Inhibition of growth of Z. mobilis by model compounds found in lignocellulosic hydrolysates. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2013, 6:99.
7. Bellona C., Drewes J.E., Xu P., Amy G. Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment: a literature review. Water Res. 2004, 38:2795-2809.
8. Van der Bruggen B., Verliefde A., Braeken L., Cornelissen E.R., Moons K., Verbeck J., van Dijk J.C., Amy G. Assessment of a semi-quantitative method for estimation of the rejection of organic compounds in aqueous solution in nanofiltration. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2006, 81:1166-1176.
9. Drazevic E., Bason S., Kosutic K., Freger V. Enhanced partitioning and transport of phenolic micropollutants within polyamide composite membranes. Envir. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46:3377-3383.
10. Nghiem L.D., Coleman P.J. NF/RO filtration of the hydrophobic ionogenic compound triclosan: transport mechanisms and influence of membrane fouling. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 62:709-716.
11. Weng Y., Wei H., Tsai T., Chen W., Wei T., Hwang C., Huang C. Separation of acetic acid from xylose by nanofiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2009, 67:95-102.
12. Weng Y., Wei H., Tsai T., Lin T., Wei T., Guo G., Huang C. Separation of furans and carboxylic acids from sugars in dilute acid rice straw hydrolyzates by nanofiltration. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:4889-4894.
13. Zhou F., Wang C., Wei J. Separation of acetic acid from monosaccharides by NF and RO membranes: performance comparison. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 429:243-251.
14. Qi B., Luo J., Chen X., Hang X., Wan Y. Separation of furfural from monosaccharides by nanofiltration. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:7111-7118.
15. Maiti S.K., Thuyavan Y.L., Singh S., Oberoi H.S., Agarwal G.P. Modeling of the separation of inhibitory components from pretreated rice straw hydrolysate by nanofiltration membranes. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 114:419-427.
16. Sagne C., Fargues C., Broyart B., Lameloise M.-L., Decloux M. Modeling permeation of volatile organic molecules through reverse osmosis spiral-wound membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 330:40-50.
17. Sagne C., Fargues C., Lewandowski R., Lameloise M.-L., Gavach M., Decloux M. A pilot scale study of reverse osmosis for the purification of condensate arising from distillery stillage concentration plant. Chem. Eng. Process. 2010, 49:331-339.
18. Nguyen N. Detoxification of Ligno-Cellulosic Hydrolyzates By Pressure-Driven Membrane Processes: Interest of Nanofiltration in a Diafiltration Mode 2014, AgroParisTech, Massy, France, (Doctorate thesis).
19. Verliefde A., Van Vliet N., Amy G., Van der Bruggen B., van Dijk J.C. A semi-quantitative method for prediction of the rejection of uncharged organic micropollutants with nanofiltration. Water Pract. Technol. 2006, 1(4):1-10. 10.2166/WPT.2006084.
20. Zidi C., Tayeb R., Boukhili N., Dhahbi M. A supported liquid membrane system for efficient extraction of vanillin from aqueous solutions. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 82:36-42.
21. Bennani Y., Kosutic K., Drazevic E., Rozic M. Wastewater from wood and pulp industry treated by combination of coagulation, adsorption on modified clinoptilotite tuff and membrane processes. Environ. Technol. 2012, 33(10):1159-1166.
22. Nghiem L.D., Hawkes S. Effects of membrane fouling on the nanofiltration of pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs): mechanisms and role of membrane pore size. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007, 57:182-190.
23. Chilyumova E., Thoming J. Nanofiltration of bivalent nickel cations: model parameter determination and process simulation. Desalination 2008, 224:12-17.
24. Warczok J., Ferrando M., Lopez F., Guell C. Concentration of apple and pear juices by nanofiltration at low pressures. J. Food Eng. 2004, 63:63-70.
25. Sagne C., Fargues C., Lewandowski R., Lameloise M.-L., Decloux M. Screening of reverse osmosis membranes for the treatment and reuse of distillery condensates into alcoholic fermentation. Desalination 2008, 219:335-347.
26. Lonsdale H., Merten U., Riley R. Transport properties of cellulose acetate osmotic membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1965, 9:1341-1362.
27. Gerard R., Hachisuka H., Hirose M. New membrane developments expanding the horizon for the application of reverse osmosis technology. Desalination 1998, 119:47-55.
28. Dalwani M., Benes N.E., Bargeman G., Stamatialis D., Wessling M. Effect of pH on the performance of polyamide/polyacrylonitrile based thin film composite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 372:228-238.
29. Fargues C., Sagne C., Szymczyk A., Fievet P., Lameloise M.-L. Adsorption of small organic solutes from beet distillery condensates on reverse-osmosis membranes: consequences on the process performances. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 446:132-144.
30. Violleau D., Essis-Tome H., Habarou H., Croué J.P., Pontié M. Fouling studies of a polyamide nanofiltration membrane by selected natural organic matter: an analytical approach. Desalination 2005, 173:223-238.
31. Sjöman E., Mänttäri M., Nyström M., Koivikko H., Heikkilä H. Separation of xylose from glucose by nanofiltration from concentrated monosaccharide solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 292:106-115.
32. Galema S.A., Hoiland H. Stereochemical aspects of hydration of carbohydrates in aqueous solutions. Density and Ultrasound measurements. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95:5321-5326.
33. Hua X., Zhao H., Yang R., Zhang W., Zhao W. Coupled model of extented Nernst-Planck equation and film theory in nanofiltration for xylo-oligosaccharide syrup. J. Food Eng. 2010, 100:302-309.