Robot-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Lung Lobectomy: Can a Robotic Approach Improve Short-Term Outcomes and Operative Safety?

Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 354-362

  Mahieu, Julien ^a   Rinieri, Philippe ^a   Bubenheim, Michael ^a   Calenda, Emile ^a   Melki, Jean ^a   Peillon, Christophe ^a   Baste, Jean Marc ^a  

^a ROUEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

lung cancer treatment; minimally invasive surgery; robotics; thoracoscopy VATS

Indexed keywords

ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE; ADULT; ARTERY INJURY; ARTICLE; ATELECTASIS; ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; BLEEDING; BRONCHIAL ARTERY; BRONCHOSCOPY; BRONCHUS OBSTRUCTION; CANCER STAGING; CHEST TUBE; COMMUNITY ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA; DELIRIUM; FEMALE; HEART FAILURE; HEMATOTHORAX; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; HYDROTHORAX; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG LOBECTOMY; LYMPHOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; NONINVASIVE VENTILATION; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PHRENIC NERVE PARALYSIS; PLEURISY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY VEIN; REOPERATION; RESPIRATORY TRACT DISEASE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; ROBOT ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY; ROBOTICS; SKIN INCISION; SUBCUTANEOUS EMPHYSEMA; THORAX DRAINAGE; THORAX SURGERY; UNSTABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; VEIN INJURY; VIDEO ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY; WEDGE RESECTION; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; FACTUAL DATABASE; FRANCE; LEARNING CURVE; LUNG RESECTION; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; RISK FACTOR; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; LEARNING CURVE; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; PNEUMONECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; THORACIC SURGERY, VIDEO-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84927916244     PISSN: 01716425     EISSN: 14391902     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1548733     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Detterbeck F. C., Lewis S. Z., Diekemper R., Addrizzo-Harris D., Alberts W. M. Executive Summary: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest: 2013; 143 5 7S 37S
2. Licht P. B., Jorgensen O. D., Ladegaard L., Jakobsen E. A national study of nodal upstaging after thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy for clinical stage I lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg: 2013; 96 3 943 949, discussion 949-950
3. Chen F. F., Zhang D., Wang Y. L., Xiong B. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy versus open lobectomy in patients with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol: 2013; 39 9 957 963
4. Mathisen D. J. Is video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy inferior to open lobectomy oncologically? Ann Thorac Surg: 2013; 96 3 755 756
5. Paul S., Altorki N. K., Sheng S., et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity than open lobectomy: a propensity-matched analysis from the STS database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 2010; 139 2 366 378
6. Swanson S. J., Meyers B. F., Gunnarsson C. L., et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy is less costly and morbid than open lobectomy: a retrospective multiinstitutional database analysis. Ann Thorac Surg: 2012; 93 4 1027 1032
7. Sugiura H., Morikawa T., Kaji M., Sasamura Y., Kondo S., Katoh H. Long-term benefits for the quality of life after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy in patients with lung cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech: 1999; 9 6 403 408
8. Ng C. S., Wan I. Y., Yim A. P. Impact of video-assisted thoracoscopic major lung resection on immune function. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann: 2009; 17 4 426 432
9. Petersen R. P., Pham D., Burfeind W. R., et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy facilitates the delivery of chemotherapy after resection for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg: 2007; 83 4 1245 1249, discussion 1250
10. Dylewski M. R., Lazzaro R. S. Robotics - The answer to the Achilles' heel of VATS pulmonary resection. Chin J Cancer Res: 2012; 24 4 259 260
11. Gharagozloo F., Margolis M., Tempesta B., Strother E., Najam F. Robot-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer: report of 100 consecutive cases. Ann Thorac Surg: 2009; 88 2 380 384
12. Park B. J., Flores R. M., Rusch V. W. Robotic assistance for video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy: technique and initial results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 2006; 131 1 54 59
13. Kent M., Wang T., Whyte R., Curran T., Flores R., Gangadharan S. Open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic lobectomy: review of a national database. Ann Thorac Surg: 2014; 97 1 236 242, discussion 242-244
14. Cerfolio R. J., Bryant A. S., Skylizard L., Minnich D. J. Initial consecutive experience of completely portal robotic pulmonary resection with 4 arms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 2011; 142 4 740 746
15. Park B. J., Melfi F., Mussi A., et al. Robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): long-term oncologic results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 2012; 143 2 383 389
16. Augustin F., Bodner J., Maier H., et al. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive vs. thoracoscopic lung lobectomy: comparison of perioperative results in a learning curve setting. Langenbecks Arch Surg: 2013; 398 6 895 901
17. Swanson S. J., Miller D. L., McKenna R. J. Jr., et al. Comparing robot-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy with conventional video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy and wedge resection: results from a multihospital database (Premier). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 2014; 147 3 929 937
18. Louie B. E., Farivar A. S., Aye R. W., Vallières E. Early experience with robotic lung resection results in similar operative outcomes and morbidity when compared with matched video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases. Ann Thorac Surg: 2012; 93 5 1598 1604, discussion 1604-1605
19. Lee B. E., Korst R. J., Kletsman E., Rutledge J. R. Transitioning from video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy to robotics for lung cancer: are there outcomes advantages? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 2014; 147 2 724 729
20. Hansen H. J., Petersen R. H., Christensen M. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy using a standardized anterior approach. Surg Endosc: 2011; 25 4 1263 1269
21. Ninan M., Dylewski M. R. Total port-access robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy without utility thoracotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg: 2010; 38 2 231 232
22. Clavien P. A., Barkun J., de Oliveira M. L., et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg: 2009; 250 2 187 196
23. Gossot D., Stern J. B., Girard P., et al. Full thoracoscopic lobectomy and segmentectomy for benign or metastatic conditions [in French]. Rev Mal Respir: 2008; 25 1 50 58
24. Veronesi G. Robotic thoracic surgery: technical considerations and learning curve for pulmonary resection. Thorac Surg Clin: 2014; 24 2 135 141, v
25. Veronesi G., Galetta D., Maisonneuve P., et al. Four-arm robotic lobectomy for the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 2010; 140 1 19 25
26. Meyer M., Gharagozloo F., Tempesta B., Margolis M., Strother E., Christenson D. The learning curve of robotic lobectomy. Int J Med Robot: 2012; 8 4 448 452