Comparing robot-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy with conventional video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy and wedge resection: Results from a multihospital database (Premier)

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 147, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 929-937

  Swanson, Scott J ^a   Miller, Daniel L ^b   McKenna, Robert Joseph ^c   Howington, John ^d   Marshall, M Blair ^e   Yoo, Andrew C ^f   Moore, Matthew ^f   Gunnarsson, Candace L ^g   Meyers, Bryan F ^h  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d NORTHSHORE UNIVERSITY HEALTHSYSTEM   (United States)

^e GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f ETHICON INC   (United States)

^g Ethicon Endo Surgery ^*  (United States)

^h BARNES JEWISH HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE RESPIRATORY FAILURE; ADULT; AGED; AIR LEAK; ARTICLE; ATELECTASIS; BRONCHOPLEURAL FISTULA; CELLULITIS; CHYLOTHORAX; COMORBIDITY; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; EMPYEMA; FEMALE; HOSPITAL COST; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; LUNG LOBECTOMY; LUNG RESECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATION DURATION; PNEUMONIA; PNEUMOTHORAX; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPENSITY SCORE; ROBOT ASSISTED THORACIC SURGICAL LOBECTOMY; ROBOTICS; TENSION PNEUMOTHORAX; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY; VIDEO ASSISTED THORACIC SURGICAL LOBECTOMY; VIDEO ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY; WEDGE RESECTION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMORBIDITY; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; HOSPITAL COSTS; HUMANS; LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS; LENGTH OF STAY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; PNEUMONECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROPENSITY SCORE; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; THORACIC SURGERY, VIDEO-ASSISTED; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84894024467     PISSN: 00225223     EISSN: 1097685X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.09.046     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. A. Barker, E.C. Maratos, L. Edmonds, and E. Lim Recurrence rates of video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open surgery in the prevention of recurrent pneumothoraces: a systematic review of randomised and non-randomised trials Lancet 370 2007 329 335
2. D. Cheng, R.J. Downey, K. Kernstine, R. Stanbridge, H. Shennib, and R. Wolf et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery in lung cancer resection: a meta-analysis and systematic review of controlled trials Innovations (Phila) 2 2007 261 292
3. A. Sedrakyan, J. van der Meulen, J. Lewsey, and T. Treasure Video assisted thoracic surgery for treatment of pneumothorax and lung resections: systematic review of randomised clinical trials BMJ 329 2004 1008
4. B.A. Whitson, S.S. Groth, S.J. Duval, S.J. Swanson, and M.A. Maddaus Surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy approaches to lobectomy Ann Thorac Surg 86 2008 2008 2016 discussion 16-18
5. R.M. Flores, and N. Alam Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy (VATS), open thoracotomy, and the robot for lung cancer Ann Thorac Surg 85 2008 S710 S715
6. R.J. McKenna Jr., W. Houck, and C.B. Fuller Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1,100 cases Ann Thorac Surg 81 2006 421 425 discussion 5-6
7. C. Cao, C. Manganas, S.C. Ang, S. Peeceeyen, and T.D. Yan Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open thoracotomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of propensity score-matched patients Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 16 2013 244 249
8. M.D. Cajipe, D. Chu, F.G. Bakaeen, R.F. Casal, S.A. LeMaire, and J.S. Coselli et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with better perioperative outcomes than open lobectomy in a veteran population Am J Surg 204 2012 607 612
9. G.B. Deutsch, S.A. Sathyanarayana, V. Gunabushanam, N. Mishra, E. Rubach, and H. Zemon et al. Robotic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: an institutional experience Surg Endosc 26 2012 956 963
10. T.A. Masterson, L. Cheng, R.S. Boris, and M.O. Koch Open vs. robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon and pathologist comparison of pathologic and oncologic outcomes Urol Oncol 31 2013 1043 1048
11. G. Turchetti, I. Palla, F. Pierotti, and A. Cuschieri Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review Surg Endosc 26 2012 598 606
12. Premier, Inc. Available from: http://www.premierinc.com/. Accessed January 12, 2012.
13. Averill RF, Goldfield N, Hughes JS, Bonazelli J, McCullough EC, Steinbeck BA, et al. What are APR-DRGs? An introduction to severity of illness and risk of mortality adjustment methodology. White paper. 2003 Available from: http://solutions.3m.com/3MContentRetrievalAPI/BlobServlet?locale=it-IT&lmd= 1218718280000&assetId=1180603360910&assetType=MMM- Image&blobAttribute=ImageFile. Accessed January 12, 2012.
14. Mayo Clinic. Gmatch macro developed by Erik Bergstralh and Jon Kosanke. 2003. Available from: http://www.mayo.edu/research/departments-divisions/ department-health-sciences-research/division-biomedical-statistics-informatics/ software/locally-written-sas-macros. Accessed November 20, 2011.
15. J.S. Weissman, and M. Zinner Comparative effectiveness research on robotic surgery JAMA 309 2013 721 722
16. J.D. Wright, C.V. Ananth, S.N. Lewin, W.M. Burke, Y.S. Lu, and A.I. Neugut et al. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease JAMA 309 2013 689 698
17. Intuitive Surgical Investor Presentation Q4 2009. Available from: http://investor.intuitivesurgical.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=122359&p=irol-IRHome. Accessed January 12, 2012.