Analysis of the social network development of a virtual community for Australian intensive care professionals

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 32, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 536-544

  Rolls, Kaye Denise ^a,b   Hansen, Margaret ^c   Jackson, Debra ^a   Elliott, Doug ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b NSW Intensive Care Coordination and Monitoring Unit   (Australia)

^c School of Nursing and Health Professions University of San Francisco   (Australia)

Author keywords

Intensive care; Mailing list; Nurses; Social media; Social networks; Virtual communities

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; COMPUTER INTERFACE; EDUCATION; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE NURSING; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

AUSTRALIA; COMMUNICATION; CRITICAL CARE NURSING; HUMANS; INTERNET; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL SUPPORT; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84927797700     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: 15389774     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000104     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Melnyk BM, Fineout-Overholt E, Gallagher-Ford L, Kaplan L. The state of evidence-based practice in US nurses: critical implications for nurse leaders and educators. J Nurs Adm. 2012; 42 (9): 410-417.
2. Hewson-Conroy K, Burrell A, Elliott D, et al. Compliance with processes of care in intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand-a point prevalence study. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2011; 39 (5): 926-935.
3. Oborn E, Barrett M, Racko G. Knowledge Translation in Healthcare: AReviewof the Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University; 2010. http://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/fileadmin/user-upload/research/workingpapers/wp1005.pdf. Accessed March 17, 2011.
4. McGowan BS. #SocialQI: Simple Solutions for Improving Your Healthcare. USA: No Limit Publishing; 2012.
5. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.
6. Wenger E, Snyder WM. Communities of practice: the organizational frontier. Harv Bus Rev. 2000: 139-145.
7. Borgatti SP, Halgin DS. On network theory. Organ Sci. 2011; 22 (5): 1168-1181.
8. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Bate P, MacFarlane F, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of Innovations in Health Service Organisations: A Systematic Literature Review. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2005.
9. Aarons GA, Hurlburt M, Horwitz SM. Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011; 38 (1): 4-23.
10. Soo CW, Devinney TM, Midgley DF. External knowledge acquisition, creativity and learning in organisational problem solving. Int J Technol Manage. 2007; 38 (1/2): 137-159.
11. Braithwaite J. Between-group behaviour in health care: gaps, edges, boundaries, disconnections, weak ties, spaces and holes. A systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010; 10 (1): 330. http://www.biomedcentral .com/1472-6963/10/330. Accessed October 13, 2013.
12. Nieves J, Osorio J. The role of social networks in knowledge creation. Knowl Manage Res Pract. 2012; 00: 1-16.
13. Gerrish K, McDonnell A, Nolan M, Guillaume L, Kirshbaum M, Tod A. The role of advanced practice nurses in knowledge brokering as ameans of promoting evidence-based practice among clinical nurses. J Adv Nurs. 2011; 67 (9): 2004-2014.
14. Currey J, Considine J, Khaw D. Clinical nurse research consultant: a clinical and academic role to advance practice and the discipline of nursing. J Adv Nurs. 2011; 67 (10): 2275-2283.
15. Creswick N, Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J. Understanding communication networks in the emergency department. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009; 9: 247. htttp://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/247. Accessed July 8, 2011
16. Spenceley SM, O'Leary KA, Chizawsky LLK, Ross AJ, Estabrooks CA. Sources of information used by nurses to inform practice: an integrative review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008; 45 (6): 954-970.
17. Bostrom A, Kajermo KN, Nordstrom G,Wallin L. Barriers to research utilization and research use among registered nurses working in the care of older people: does the BARRIERS Scale discriminate between research users and non-research users on perceptions of barriers? Implement Sci. 2008; 3: 24. http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1748-5908-3-24.pdf. Accessed May 4, 2009.
18. deVries S, Bloemen P, Roossink L. Online knowledge communities. In: Davies G, Owen CB, eds.WebNet 2000 World Conference on the WWWand Internet Proceedings; AACE, San Antonio,TX; October 30- November 4, 2000.
19. Deng L, Poole MS. Learning through ICT-enabled social networks. Int J Inform Manage. 2008; 7 (4): 374-391.
20. Grajales FJ. Social Media: A Comprehensive Knowledge Synthesis and Case Studies of Applications in Medicine and Health (care) [dissertation]. Vancouver, BC, Canada: University of British Columbia; 2012. http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/obj/thesescanada/vol2/BVAU/TC-BVAU-42806.pdf. Accessed April 28, 2013.
21. de Lusignan S, Pritchard K, Chan T. A knowledge management model for clinical practice. J Postgrad Med. 2002; 48: 297-303.
22. Hamm MP, Chisholm A, Shulhan J, et al. Social media use by health care professionals and trainees: a scoping review. Acad Med. 2013; 18 (13): 1376-1383.
23. Schoch NA, Shooshan SE. Communication on a listserv for health information professionals: uses and users of MEDLIB-L. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1997; 85 (1): 23-32.
24. Murray PJ. Nurses' computer-mediated communications onNURSENET: a case study. Comput Nurs. 1996; 14 (4): 227-234.
25. deWitt A, Gunn SPH, Streat S. Critical care mailing list: growth of an online forum. BMJ. 2004; 328: 1180.
26. Macdonald L, MacPherson DW, Gushulak BD. Online communication as a potential travel medicine research tool: analysis of messages posted on the TravelMed listserv. J Travel Med. 2009; 16 (1): 7-12.
27. Hara N, Hew K. Knowledge-sharing in an online community of health care professionals. Inform Technol People. 2007; 20 (3): 235-261.
28. Cervantez Thompson TL, Penprase B. RehabNurse-L. An analysis of the rehabilitation nursing LISTSERV experience. Rehabil Nurs. 2004; 29 (2): 56-61.
29. Smith C. A longitudinal study of the culture of MEDLIB-L. J Hosp Librariansh. 2004; 4 (1): 29-42.
30. Rodriguez-Recio FJ, Sendra-Portero F. Analysis of the Spanish-speaking mailing list RADIOLOGIA. Eur J Radiol. 2007; 63: 136-143.
31. Irvine-Smith S. A series of encounters: the information behaviour of participants in a subject-based electronic discussion list. Int J Inform Knowl Manage. 2009; 9 (9): 183-201.
32. Hoffmann T, Desha L, Verrall K. Evaluating an online occupational therapy community of practice and its role in supporting occupational therapy practice. Aust J Occup Ther. 2011; 58: 337-345.
33. Brooks F, Scott P. Knowledge work in nursing and midwifery: an evaluation through computer-mediated communication. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006; 43: 83-97.
34. Morken T, Bull N, Moen BE. The activity on a Norwegian Occupational Health mailing list 1997-2006.Occup Med (Lond). 2009; 59: 56-58.
35. Hew KF, Hara N. Empirical study of motivators and barriers of teacher online knowledge sharing. Educ Technol Res Dev. 2007; 55: 573-595.
36. Rolls K, Kowal D, Elliott D, Burrell AR. Building a statewide knowledge network for clinicians in intensive care units: knowledge brokering and the NSW Intensive Care Coordination and Monitoring Unit. Aust Crit Care. 2008; 21 (1): 27-37.
37. Oliver Young G. Top enterpriseWeb 2.0 Predictions for 2008. Forrester Research Inc; 2008. 43882. http://www.forrester.com/Top+Enterprise+ Web+20+Predictions+For+2008/fulltext/-/E-RES43882?docid=43882&src=44213pdf. Accessed April 3, 2011.
38. David I, Poissant L, Rochette A. Clinicians' Expectations of Web 2.0 as a Mechanismfor Knowledge Transfer of Stroke Best Practices. J Med Internet Res. 2012; 14 (5). http://www.jmir.org/2012/5/e121/. Accessed June 11, 2013.
39. Archambault PM, Légaré F, Lavoie A, et al. Study protocol Healthcare professionals' intentions to use wiki-based reminders to promote best practices in trauma care: a survey protocol. Implement Sci. 2010; 5: 45. http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1748-5908-5-45.pdf. Accessed July 13, 2013.
40. Drennan K, Hicks P, Hart GK. Intensive Care Resources and Activity: Australia andNewZealand 2007/2008. Melbourne, Australia: ANZICS; 2010.
41. CICM. Minimum Standards for Intensive Care. Melbourne, Australia: College of Intensive Care Medicine; 2010.
42. CICM. Recommendations on Standards for High Dependency Units forTraining in Intensive Care Medicine.Melbourne, Australia: College of Intensive CareMedicine of Australia and New Zealand; 2010.
43. ACCCN. Position statement: ICU staffing. 2003. http://www.acccn .com.au/images/stories/downloads/staffing-intensive-care-nursing.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2008.
44. Hara N, Shachaf P, Stoerger S. Online communities of practice typology revisited. J Inform Sci. 2009; 35 (6): 740-757.
45. Kitson A. Knowlege translation and guidelines: a transfer, translation or transformation process? Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2009; 7: 124-139.
46. Cho H, Chen M, Chung S. Testing an integrative theoretical model of knowledge-sharing behaviour in the context of Wikipedia. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2010; 61 (6): 1198-1212.
47. Dube L, Bourhis A, Jacob J. Towards a typology of virtual communities of practice. Interdisc J Inform Knowl Manage. 2006; 1: 69-93.
48. Dahlander L, Frederiksen L. The core and cosmopolitans: a relational view of innovation in user communities. Organ Sci. 2012; 23 (4): 988-1007.
49. Gagnon M-P, Desmartis M, Labrecque M, et al. Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals.J Med Syst. 2012; 36 (1): 241-277.
50. Hara N. Information technology support for communities of practice: howpublic defenders learn about winning and losing in Court.J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2007; 58 (1): 76-87.