Longitudinal assessment of colonoscopy quality indicators: A report from the Gastroenterology Practice Management Group

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 80, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 835-841

  Hernandez, Lyndon V ^a   Deas, Thomas M ^b   Catalano, Marc F ^c   Guda, Nalini M ^c   Huang, Lin ^d   Ketover, Scott R ^e   Etzkorn, Kyle P ^f   Gutta, Kumar G ^b   Morris, Steve J ^g   Schmalz, Michael J ^c   Klyve, Dominic ^h   Allen, John I ⁱ  

^a MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^b Gastroenterology Associates of North Texas   (United States)

^c GI Associates LLC   (United States)

^d Digestive Health Specialists   (United States)

^e Minnesota Gastroenterology   (United States)

^f Borland Groover Clinic   (United States)

^g Atlanta Gastroenterology Associates   (United States)

^h CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁱ YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOMA DETECTION RATE; ADENOMATOUS POLYP; ADULT; AMBULATORY SURGERY; ARTICLE; COLONOSCOPY; DATA BASE; FEMALE; GASTROENTEROLOGIST; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ADENOMATOUS POLYPS; AGED; COLONIC POLYPS; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; GASTROENTEROLOGY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; QUALITY CONTROL; STANDARDS; TRENDS;

ADENOMATOUS POLYPS; AGED; BENCHMARKING; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; GASTROENTEROLOGY; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84927788405     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.02.1043     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. MedPAC. Ambulatory surgical center services: Assessing payment adequacy and updating payments. MedPAC data book, June 2006. Available at: http://www.medpac.gov/chapters/Mar12-Ch05.pdf Accessed October 2013.
2. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;362: 1795-803.
3. Hernandez LV, Allen JI, Klyve D, et al. Colonoscopy quality indicators from a nationwide consortium of GI practices [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:396.
4. Medicare Claims Processing Manual. Chapter 14. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-guidance/guidance/manuals/downloads/clm104c14.pdf Accessed September 2013.
5. Rex DK, Hewett DG, Raghavendra M, et al. The impact of video recording on the quality of colonoscopy performance: A pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:2312-7.
6. Mehrotra A, Dellon ES, Schoen RE, et al. Applying a natural language processing tool to electronic health records to assess performance on colonoscopy quality measures. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75:1233-9.
7. GI Quality Improvement Consortium. Available at: http://giquic.gi.org/index.asp Accessed September 2013.
8. Hing E, Hall MJ, Ashman JJ. Use of electronic medical records by ambulatory care providers: United States, 2006. Natl Health Stat Report 2010;22:1-21.
9. Adler A, Wegscheider K, Lieberman D, et al. Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: A prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12, 134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3). Gut 2013;62:236-41.
10. Chen SC, Rex DK. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:856-61.
11. Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR. Can we improve adenoma detection rates? A systematic review of intervention studies. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74:656-65.