5-Hydroxymethylation marks a class of neuronal gene regulated by intragenic methylcytosine levels

Genomics

Volumn 104, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 383-392

  Irwin, Rachelle E ^a   Thakur, Avinash ^a   O' Neill, Karla M ^a   Walsh, Colum P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

5' Hydroxymethylation; 5' Methylcytosine; Development; Epigenetics; Gametes; Neuronal function

Indexed keywords

5 HYDROXYMETHYLCYTOSINE; 5 METHYLCYTOSINE; DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE 1; METHYLTRANSFERASE INHIBITOR; 5-HYDROXYMETHYLCYTOSINE; CYTOSINE; DNA (CYTOSINE 5) METHYLTRANSFERASE; DNA (CYTOSINE-5-)-METHYLTRANSFERASE 1; ENZYME INHIBITOR;

5 HYDROXYMETHYLATION; ARTICLE; CELL FUNCTION; DEVELOPMENT; DNA METHYLATION; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; FIBROBLAST; GENE; GENE CONTROL; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE SILENCING; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; HUMAN; METHYLATION; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL DIFFERENTIATION; NEURONAL GENE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYNAPSE; 3T3 CELL LINE; ANALOGS AND DERIVATIVES; ANIMAL; BRAIN; DNA SEQUENCE; DRUG EFFECTS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE INACTIVATION; GENETICS; GENOME IMPRINTING; GERM CELL; METABOLISM; MOUSE;

5-METHYLCYTOSINE; ANIMALS; BRAIN; CYTOSINE; DNA (CYTOSINE-5-)-METHYLTRANSFERASE; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; ENZYME INHIBITORS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE KNOCKOUT TECHNIQUES; GENOMIC IMPRINTING; GERM CELLS; HUMANS; MICE; NEURONS; NIH 3T3 CELLS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84927698340     PISSN: 08887543     EISSN: 10898646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2014.08.013     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. He Y.F., Li B.Z., Li Z., Liu P., Wang Y., Tang Q., Ding J., Jia Y., Chen Z., Li L., Sun Y., Li X., Dai Q., Song C.X., Zhang K., He C., Xu G.L. Tet-mediated formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its excision by TDG in mammalian DNA. Science 2011, 333:1303-1307.
2. Hashimoto H., Hong S., Bhagwat A.S., Zhang X., Cheng X. Excision of 5-hydroxymethyluracil and 5-carboxylcytosine by the thymine DNA glycosylase domain: its structural basis and implications for active DNA demethylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:10203-10214.
3. Shen L., Wu H., Diep D., Yamaguchi S., D'Alessio A.C., Fung H.L., Zhang K., Zhang Y. Genome-wide analysis reveals TET- and TDG-dependent 5-methylcytosine oxidation dynamics. Cell 2013, 153:692-706.
4. Ficz G., Branco M.R., Seisenberger S., Santos F., Krueger F., Hore T.A., Marques C.J., Andrews S., Reik W. Dynamic regulation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse ES cells and during differentiation. Nature 2011, 473:398-402.
5. Gu T.P., Guo F., Yang H., Wu H.P., Xu G.F., Liu W., Xie Z.G., Shi L., He X., Jin S.G., Iqbal K., Shi Y.G., Deng Z., Szabo P.E., Pfeifer G.P., Li J., Xu G.L. The role of Tet3 DNA dioxygenase in epigenetic reprogramming by oocytes. Nature 2011, 477:606-610.
6. Zhang R.R., Cui Q.Y., Murai K., Lim Y.C., Smith Z.D., Jin S., Ye P., Rosa L., Lee Y.K., Wu H.P., Liu W., Xu Z.M., Yang L., Ding Y.Q., Tang F., Meissner A., Ding C., Shi Y., Xu G.L. Tet1 regulates adult hippocampal neurogenesis and cognition. Cell Stem Cell 2013, 13:237-245.
7. Hahn M.A., Qiu R., Wu X., Li A.X., Zhang H., Wang J., Jui J., Jin S.G., Jiang Y., Pfeifer G.P., Lu Q. Dynamics of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and chromatin marks in mammalian neurogenesis. Cell. Rep. 2013, 3:291-300.
8. Lister R., Mukamel E.A., Nery J.R., Urich M., Puddifoot C.A., Johnson N.D., Lucero J., Huang Y., Dwork A.J., Schultz M.D., Yu M., Tonti-Filippini J., Heyn H., Hu S., Wu J.C., Rao A., Esteller M., He C., Haghighi F.G., Sejnowski T.J., Behrens M.M., Ecker J.R. Global epigenomic reconfiguration during mammalian brain development. Science 2013, 341:1237905.
9. Neri F., Krepelova A., Incarnato D., Maldotti M., Parlato C., Galvagni F., Matarese F., Stunnenberg H.G., Oliviero S. Dnmt3L antagonizes DNA methylation at bivalent promoters and favors DNA methylation at gene bodies in ESCs. Cell 2013, 155:121-134.
10. Wu H., Coskun V., Tao J., Xie W., Ge W., Yoshikawa K., Li E., Zhang Y., Sun Y.E. Dnmt3a-dependent nonpromoter DNA methylation facilitates transcription of neurogenic genes. Science 2010, 329:444-448.
11. Thomson J.P., Skene P.J., Selfridge J., Clouaire T., Guy J., Webb S., Kerr A.R., Deaton A., Andrews R., James K.D., Turner D.J., Illingworth R., Bird A. CpG islands influence chromatin structure via the CpG-binding protein Cfp1. Nature 2010, 464:1082-1086.
12. Maunakea A.K., Nagarajan R.P., Bilenky M., Ballinger T.J., D'Souza C., Fouse S.D., Johnson B.E., Hong C., Nielsen C., Zhao Y., Turecki G., Delaney A., Varhol R., Thiessen N., Shchors K., Heine V.M., Rowitch D.H., Xing X., Fiore C., Schillebeeckx M., Jones S.J., Haussler D., Marra M.A., Hirst M., Wang T., Costello J.F. Conserved role of intragenic DNA methylation in regulating alternative promoters. Nature 2010, 466:253-257.
13. Illingworth R.S., Gruenewald-Schneider U., Webb S., Kerr A.R., James K.D., Turner D.J., Smith C., Harrison D.J., Andrews R., Bird A.P. Orphan CpG islands identify numerous conserved promoters in the mammalian genome. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1001134.
14. Huang da W., Sherman B.T., Lempicki R.A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4:44-57.
15. Huang da W., Sherman B.T., Lempicki R.A. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37:1-13.
16. Rutledge C.E., Thakur A., O'Neill K.M., Irwin R.E., Sato S., Hata K., Walsh C.P. Ontogeny, conservation and functional significance of maternally inherited DNA methylation at two classes of non-imprinted genes. Development 2014, 141:1313-1323.
17. Smallwood S.A., Tomizawa S., Krueger F., Ruf N., Carli N., Segonds-Pichon A., Sato S., Hata K., Andrews S.R., Kelsey G. Dynamic CpG island methylation landscape in oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43:811-814.
18. Kobayashi H., Sakurai T., Imai M., Takahashi N., Fukuda A., Yayoi O., Sato S., Nakabayashi K., Hata K., Sotomaru Y., Suzuki Y., Kono T. Contribution of intragenic DNA methylation in mouse gametic DNA methylomes to establish oocyte-specific heritable marks. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8:e1002440.
19. Szwagierczak A., Bultmann S., Schmidt C.S., Spada F., Leonhardt H. Sensitive enzymatic quantification of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in genomic DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38:e181.
20. Dobbin E., Corrigan P.M., Walsh C.P., Welham M.J., Freeburn R.W., Wheadon H. Tel/PDGFRbeta inhibits self-renewal and directs myelomonocytic differentiation of ES cells. Leuk. Res. 2008, 32:1554-1564.
21. Hitoshi S., Seaberg R.M., Koscik C., Alexson T., Kusunoki S., Kanazawa I., Tsuji S., van der Kooy D. Primitive neural stem cells from the mammalian epiblast differentiate to definitive neural stem cells under the control of Notch signaling. Genes Dev. 2004, 18:1806-1811.
22. Woodfine K., Huddleston J.E., Murrell A. Quantitative analysis of DNA methylation at all human imprinted regions reveals preservation of epigenetic stability in adult somatic tissue. Epigenetics Chromatin. 2011, 4:1.
23. Jin S.G., Wu X., Li A.X., Pfeifer G.P. Genomic mapping of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in the human brain. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:5015-5024.
24. Loughery J.E., Dunne P.D., O'Neill K.M., Meehan R.R., McDaid J.R., Walsh C.P. DNMT1 deficiency triggers mismatch repair defects in human cells through depletion of repair protein levels in a process involving the DNA damage response. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2011, 20:3241-3255.
25. Nestor C.E., Ottaviano R., Reddington J., Sproul D., Reinhardt D., Dunican D., Katz E., Dixon J.M., Harrison D.J., Meehan R.R. Tissue type is a major modifier of the 5-hydroxymethylcytosine content of human genes. Genome Res. 2012, 22:467-477.
26. Smallwood S.A., Kelsey G. De novo DNA methylation: a germ cell perspective. Trends Genet. 2012, 28:33-42.
27. Giardine B., Riemer C., Hardison R.C., Burhans R., Elnitski L., Shah P., Zhang Y., Blankenberg D., Albert I., Taylor J., Miller W., Kent W.J., Nekrutenko A. Galaxy: a platform for interactive large-scale genome analysis. Genome Res. 2005, 15:1451-1455.
28. Li J.Y., Lees-Murdock D.J., Xu G.L., Walsh C.P. Timing of establishment of paternal methylation imprints in the mouse. Genomics 2004, 84:952-960.
29. Lees-Murdock D.J., Lau H.T., Castrillon D.H., De Felici M., Walsh C.P. DNA methyltransferase loading, but not de novo methylation, is an oocyte-autonomous process stimulated by SCF signalling. Dev. Biol. 2008, 321:238-250.