Informing dose design by modeling transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 125, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 2147-2149

  Toshev, Peter K ^a   Guleyupoglu, Berkan ^a   Bikson, Marom ^a  

^a City University of New York   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; CENTRAL GRAY MATTER; COMPARTMENT MODEL; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; EDITORIAL; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION THERAPY; HUMAN; NEUROMODULATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; TRANSCUTANEOUS NERVE STIMULATION; TRANSCUTANEOUS SPINAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; VERTEBRA; WHITE MATTER; FEMALE; MALE;

FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE;

EID: 84927695821     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: 18728952     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.03.022     Document Type: Editorial

References (33)

1. Aguilar J., Pulecchi F., Dilena R., Oliviero A., Priori A., Foffani G. Spinal direct current stimulation modulates the activity of gracile nucleus and primary somatosensory cortex in anaesthetized rats. J Physiol 2011, 589:4981-4996.
2. Ahmed Z. Trans-spinal direct current stimulation modulates motor cortex-induced muscle contraction in mice. J Appl Physiol 2011, 110:1414-1424.
3. Ahmed Z. Trans-spinal direct current stimulation alters muscle tone in mice with and without spinal cord injury with spasticity. J Neurosci 2014, 34:1701-1709.
4. Bikson M., Datta A. Guidelines for precise and accurate computational models of tDCS. Brain Stimul 2012, 5:430-431.
5. Bikson M., Rahman A., Datta A. Computational models of transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin EEG Neurosci 2012, 43:176-183.
6. Bikson M., Dmochowski J., Rahman A. The, "quasi-uniform" assumption in animal and computational models of non-invasive electrical stimulation. Brain Stimul 2013, 6:704-705.
7. Brunoni A.R., Nitsche M.A., Bolognini N., Bikson M., Wagner T., Merabet L., et al. Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions. Brain Stimul 2012, 5:175-195.
8. Capogrosso M., Wenger N., Raspopovic S., Musienko P., Beauparlant J., Bassi Luciani L., et al. A computational model for epidural electrical stimulation of spinal sensorimotor circuits. J Neurosci 2013, 33:19326-19340.
9. Chan C.Y., Nicholson C. Modulation by applied electric fields of Purkinje and stellate cell activity in the isolated turtle cerebellum. J Physiol 1986, 371:89-114.
10. Christ A., Kainz W., Hahn E.G., Honegger K., Zefferer M., Neufeld E., et al. The Virtual Family-development of surface-based anatomical models of two adults and two children for dosimetric simulations. Phys Med Biol 2010, 55:N23-N38.
11. Cogiamanian F., Vergari M., Pulecchi F., Marceglia S., Priori A. Effect of spinal transcutaneous direct current stimulation on somatosensory evoked potentials in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 2008, 119:2636-2640.
12. Cogiamanian F., Vergari M., Schiaffi E., Marceglia S., Ardolino G., Barbieri S., et al. Transcutaneous spinal cord direct current stimulation inhibits the lower limb nociceptive flexion reflex in human beings. Pain 2011, 152:370-375.
13. Datta A., Truong D., Minhas P., Parra L.C., Bikson M. Inter-individual variation during transcranial direct current stimulation and normalization of dose using MRI-derived computational models. Front Psychiatry 2012, 3:1-8.
14. Dmochowski J.P., Datta A., Bikson M., Su Y., Parra L.C. Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target. J Neural Eng 2011, 8:1-16.
15. Guleyupoglu B., Schestatsky P., Edwards D., Fregni F., Bikson M. Classification of methods in transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) and evolving strategy from historical approaches to contemporary innovations. J Neurosci Methods 2013, 219:297-311.
16. Hamid S., Hayek R. Role of electrical stimulation for rehabilitation and regeneration after spinal cord injury: an overview. Eur Spine J 2008, 17:1256-1269.
17. Hernandez-Labrado G.R., Polo J.L., Lopez-Dolado E., Collazos-Castro J.E. Spinal cord direct current stimulation: finite element analysis of the electric field and current density. Med Biol Eng Comput 2011, 49:417-429.
18. Kabakov A., Muller P.A., Pascual-Leone A., Jensen F.E., Rotenberg A. Contribution of axonal orientation to pathway-dependent modulation of excitatory transmission by direct current stimulation in isolated rat hippocampus. J Neurophysiol 2012, 107:1881-1889.
19. Kitano K., Koceja D.M. Spinal reflex in human lower leg muscles evoked by transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation. J Neurosci Methods 2009, 180:111-115.
20. Lim C., Shin H. Noninvasive DC stimulation on neck changes MEP. Neuroreport 2011, 22:819-823.
21. McIntyre C.C., Grill W.M., Sherman D.L., Thakor N.V. Cellular effects of deep brain stimulation: model-based analysis of activation and inhibition. J Neurophysiol 2004, 91:1457-1469.
22. Nitsche M.A., Cohen L.G., Wassermann E.M., Priori A., Lang N., Antal A., et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008. Brain Stimul 2008, 1:206-223.
23. Parazzini M., Fiocchi S., Liorni I., Rossi E., Cogiamanian F., Vergari M., et al. Modelling the current density generated by transcutaneous spinal Direct Current Stimulation (tsDCS). Clin Neurophysiol 2014, 125:2260-2270.
24. Peterchev A.V., Wagner T.A., Miranda P.C., Nitsche M.A., Paulus W., Lisanby S.H., et al. Fundamentals of transcranial electric and magnetic stimulation dose: definition, selection and reporting practices. Brain Stimul 2012, 5:435-453.
25. Rahman A., Reato D., Arlotti M., Gasca F., Datta A., Parra L.C., et al. Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects. J Physiol 2013, 591:2563-2578.
26. Rahman A., Toshev P.K., Bikson M. Polarizing cerebellar neurons with transcranial Direct Current Stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2014, 125:435-438.
27. Ranck J.B. Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: a review. Brain Res 1975, 98:417-440.
28. Salomons G. A function profile for nurses-voluntary or compulsory?. TVZ 1992, 10:379-380.
29. Shahid S., Wen P., Ahfock T. Numerical investigation of white matter anisotropic conductivity in defining current distribution under tDCS. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2013, 102:48-64.
30. Shahid S., Wen P., Ahfock T. Assessment of electric field distribution in anisotropic cortical and subcortical regions under the influence of tDCS. Bioelectromagnetics 2014, 35:41-57.
31. Sunderam S., Gluckman B., Reato D., Bikson M. Toward rational design of electrical stimulation strategies for epilepsy control. Epilepsy Behav 2010, 17:6-22.
32. Wagner S., Rampersad S.M., Aydin U., Oostendorp T.F., Neuling T., Hermann C.S., et al. Investigation of tDCS volume conduction effects in a highly realistic head model. J Neural Eng 2014, 11:1-14.
33. Winkler T., Hering P., Straube A. Spinal DC stimulation in humans modulates post-activation depression of the H-reflex depending on current polarity. Clin Neurophysiol 2010, 121:957-961.