Quantitative analysis of morphological changes in yeast colonies growing on solid medium: The eccentricity and Fourier indices

Yeast

Volumn 31, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 431-440

  Gil de Prado, Elena ^a   Rivas, Eva María ^a   de Silóniz, María Isabel ^a   Diezma, Belén ^a,b   Barreiro, Pilar ^a,b   Peinado, José M ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Colony eccentricity; Colony edge irregularity; Inhibition among colonies; Yeast colony shape

Indexed keywords

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; AGAR; CULTURE MEDIUM;

AGAR MEDIUM; ARTICLE; DEBARYOMYCES; DEBARYOMYCES FABRYI; ENERGY METABOLISM; FOURIER ANALYSIS; FUNGAL COLONIZATION; FUNGAL STRUCTURES; IMAGE ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RHODOTORULA GLUTINIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SURFACE PROPERTY; YEAST; ZYGOSACCHAROMYCES ROUXII; BIOMETRY; CHEMISTRY; CULTURE MEDIUM; FLUORESCENCE IMAGING; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; IMAGE PROCESSING;

DEBARYOMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES;

AGAR; BIOMETRY; CULTURE MEDIA; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; OPTICAL IMAGING; YEASTS;

EID: 84927581441     PISSN: 0749503X     EISSN: 10970061     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/yea.3036     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Agüera A, Brophy D. 2011. Use of sagittal otolith shape analysis to discriminate north-east Atlantic and western Mediterranean stocks of Atlantic saury, Scomberesox saurus saurus (Walbaum). Fish Res 110: 465-471.
2. Be'er A, Zhang HP, Florin EL, et al. 2009. Deadly competition between sibling bacterial colonies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 428-433.
3. Boschke E, Bley TH. 1998. Growth patterns of yeast colonies depending on nutrient supply. Acta Biotechnol 1: 17-27.
4. Banada PP, Guo S, Bayraktar B, et al. 2007. Optical forward-scattering for detection of Listeria monocytogenes and other Listeria species. Biosens Bioelectron 22: 1664-1671.
5. Camargo Neto J, Meyer EG, Jones DD, Samal AK. 2006. Plant species identification using elliptic Fourier leaf shape analysis. Comput Electron Agr 50: 121-134.
6. Carlo JM, Barbeitos MS, Lasker HR. 2011. Quantifying complex shapes: elliptical Fourier analysis of octocoral sclerites. Biol Bull 220: 224-237.
7. Clemmensen LH, Hansen ME, Frisvad JC, et al. 2007. A method for comparison of growth media in objective identification of Penicillium based on multi-spectral imaging. J Microbiol Methods 69: 249-255.
8. den Hertog AL, Visser DW, Ingham CJ, et al. 2010. Simplified automated image analysis for detection and phenotyping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis on porous supports by monitoring growing microcolonies. PLoS One 5: e11008.
9. Dorge T, Carstensen JM, Frisvad JC. 2000. Direct identification of pure Penicillium species using image analysis. J Microbiol Methods 41: 121-133.
10. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE, Eddins SL. 2004. Digital Image Processing Using Matlab. Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.
11. Granek JA, Magwene PM. 2010. Environmental and genetic determinants of colony morphology in yeast. PLoS Genet 6: e1000823.
12. Halme A, Bumgarner S, Styles C, Fink GR. 2004. Genetic and epigenetic regulation of the FLO gene family generates cell-surface variation in yeast. Cell 116: 405-415.
13. Hansen ME, Lund F, Carstensen JM. 2003. Visual clone identification of Penicillium commune isolates. J Microbiol Methods 52: 221-229.
14. Kocková-Kratochvilová A. 1990. Yeasts and Yeast-like Organisms, 2nd edn. Wiley-VCH: Weinheim.
15. Kuhl FP, Giardina CR. 1982. Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Comput Graphics Image Proc 18: 236-258.
16. Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T (eds). 2011. The Yeasts. A Taxonomic Study, 5th edn. Elsevier: San Diego, CA.
17. Lo WS, Dranginis AM. 1996. FLO11, a yeast gene related to the STA genes, encodes a novel cell surface flocculin. J Bacteriol 178: 7144-7151.
18. Mebatsion HK, Paliwal J, Jayas DS. 2012. Evaluation of variations in the shape of grain types using principal components analysis of the elliptic Fourier descriptors. Comput Electron Agr 80: 63-70.
19. Memarian N, Jessulat M, Alirezaie J, et al. 2007. Colony size measurement of the yeast gene deletion strains for functional genomics. BMC Bioinformat 8: 117-128.
20. Mertens L, Van Derlinden E, Van Impe JF. 2012. A novel method for high-throughput data collection in predictive microbiology: optical density monitoring of colony growth as a function of time. Food Microbiol 32: 196-201.
21. Otsu N. 1979. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans Sys Man Cyber 9: 62-66.
22. Palková Z, Janderová B, Gabriel J, et al. 1997. Ammonia mediates communication between yeast colonies. Nature 390: 532-536.
23. Palková Z, Forstová J. 2000. Yeast colonies synchronise their growth and development. J Cell Sci 113: 1923-1928.
24. Peters AC. 1990. Use of image analysis to map bacterial growth on solid media. Binary Comput Microbiol 2: 73-75.
25. Puchkov EO. 2010. Computer image analysis of microbial colonies. Microbiology 79: 141-146.
26. Reynolds TB, Fink GR. 2001. Bakers' yeast, a model for fungal biofilm formation. Science 291: 878-881.
27. Robinson A, Sadr-Kazemi N, Dickason G, Harrison STL. 1998. Morphological characterisation of yeast colony growth on solid media using image processing. Biotechnol Tech 12: 763-767.
28. Romero P, Patiño B, Quirós M, et al. 2005. Differential detection of Debaryomyces hansenii isolated from intermediate-moisture foods by PCR-RFLP of the IGS region of rDNA. FEMS Yeast Res 5: 455-461.
29. Šťovíček V, Váchová L, Kuthan M, Palková Z. 2010. General factors important for the formation of structured biofilm-like yeast colonies. Fungal Genet Biol 47: 1012-1022.
30. Váchová L, Cáp M, Palková Z. 2012. Yeast colonies: a model for studies of aging, environmental adaptation, and longevity. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2012: 601836. doi: 10.1155/2012/601836
31. Váchová L, Stovícek V, Hlavácek O, et al. 2011. Flo11p, drug efflux pumps, and the extracellular matrix cooperate to form biofilm yeast colonies. J Cell Biol 194: 679-687.
32. Verstrepen KJ, Derdelinckx G, Delvaux FR, et al. 2001. Late fermentation expression of FLO1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Am Soc Brew Chem 59: 69-76.
33. Verstrepen KJ, Klis F. 2006. Flocculation, adhesion and biofilm formation in yeasts. Mol Microbiol 60: 5-15.
34. Vopálenská I, Hulková M, Janderová B, Palková Z. 2005. The morphology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae colonies is affected by cell adhesion and the budding pattern. Res Microbiol 156: 921-931.
35. Vopálenská I, Šťovíček V, Janderová B, et al. 2010. Role of distinct dimorphic transitions in territory colonizing and formation of yeast colony architecture. Environ Microbiol 12: 264-277.
36. Wrent P, Rivas EM, Peinado JM, de Silóniz MI. 2010. Strain typing of Zygosaccharomyces yeast species using a single molecular method based on polymorphism of the intergenic spacer region (IGS). Int J Food Microbiol 142: 89-96.
37. Yang K, Wang J, Li X, et al. 2001. Strain selection of Metarhizium anisopliae by image analysis of colony morphology for consistency of steroid biotransformation. Biotechnol Bioeng 75: 53-62.