Quantifying spatial heterogeneity of chlorophyll fluorescence during plant growth and in response to water stress

Plant Methods

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Bresson, Justine ^a,b,c   Vasseur, François ^d   Dauzat, Myriam ^a   Koch, Garance ^a   Granier, Christine ^a   Vile, Denis ^a  

^a UMR 759 LEPSE   (France)

^b LABORATOIRE DES SYMBIOSES TROPICALES ET MÉDITERRANÉENNES   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^d MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

m values; v F; Arabidopsis thaliana; Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging; Heterogeneity of F; Modelling; Photosynthetic performance; Pixels distribution; Plant growth; Plant survival; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA;

EID: 84927132779     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17464811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13007-015-0067-5     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Granier C, Vile D. Phenotyping and beyond: modelling the relationships between traits. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2014;18:96-102.
2. Baker NR, Rosenqvist E. Applications of chlorophyll fluorescence can improve crop production strategies: an examination of future possibilities. J Exp Bot. 2004;55:1607-21.
3. Porcar-Castell A, Tyystjärvi E, Atherton J, van der Tol C, Flexas J, Pfündel EE, et al. Linking chlorophyll a fluorescence to photosynthesis for remote sensing applications: mechanisms and challenges. J Exp Bot. 2014;doi:10.1093/jxb/eru191.
4. Chaerle L, Leinonen I, Jones HG, Van Der Straeten D. Monitoring and screening plant populations with combined thermal and chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. J Exp Bot. 2007;58:773-84.
5. Murchie EH, Lawson T. Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: a guide to good practice and understanding some new applications. J Exp Bot. 2013;doi:10.1093/jxb/ert208.
6. Maxwell K, Johnson GN. Chlorophyll fluorescence - a practical guide. J Exp Bot. 2000;51:659-68.
7. Genty B, Briantais J-M, Baker NR. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-General Subjects. 1989;990:87-92.
8. Woo NS, Badger MR, Pogson BJ. A rapid, non-invasive procedure for quantitative assessment of drought survival using chlorophyll fluorescence. Plant Methods. 2008;4:27.
9. Hunt S. Measurements of photosynthesis and respiration in plants. Physiol Plant. 2003;117:314-25.
10. Sperdouli I, Moustakas M. Spatio-temporal heterogeneity in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves under drought stress. Plant Biol. 2012;14:118-28.
11. Gray GR, Hope BJ, Qin XQ, Taylor BG, Whitehead CL. The characterization of photoinhibition and recovery during cold acclimation in Arabidopsis thaliana using chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Physiol Plant. 2003;119:365-75.
12. Ehlert B, Hincha DK. Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging accurately quantifies freezing damage and cold acclimation responses in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Methods. 2008;4:12.
13. Janka E, Körner O, Rosenqvist E, Ottosen C-O. High temperature stress monitoring and detection using chlorophyll a fluorescence and infrared thermography in chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora). Plant Physiol Biochem. 2013;67:87-94.
14. Quilliam RS, Swarbrick PJ, Scholes JD, Rolfe SA. Imaging photosynthesis in wounded leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana. J Exp Bot. 2006;57:55-69.
15. Bolhàr-Nordenkampf HR, Öquist G. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool in photosynthesis research. In: Hall DO, Scurlock JMO, Bolhàr-Nordenkampf HR, Leegood RC, Long SP, editors. Photosynthesis and Production in a Changing Environment. Springer Netherlands; 1993. p. 193-206.
16. Rousseau C, Belin E, Bove E, Rousseau D, Fabre F, Berruyer R, et al. High throughput quantitative phenotyping of plant resistance using chlorophyll fluorescence image analysis. Plant Methods. 2013;9:17.
17. Rincon A, Valladares F, Gimeno TE, Pueyo JJ. Water stress responses of two Mediterranean tree species influenced by native soil microorganisms and inoculation with a plant growth promoting rhizobacterium. Tree Physiol. 2008;28:1693-701.
18. Heidari M, Golpayegani A. Effects of water stress and inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on antioxidant status and photosynthetic pigments in basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. 2012;11:57-61.
19. Bresson J, Vasseur F, Dauzat M, Labadie M, Varoquaux F, Touraine B, et al. Interact to survive: Phyllobacterium brassicacearum improves Arabidopsis tolerance to severe water deficit and growth recovery. PLoS One. 2014;9:e107607.
20. Chaves MM. Effects of water deficits on carbon assimilation. J Exp Bot. 1991;42:1-16.
21. Krause GH. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis. An evaluation of damaging and protective mechanisms. Physiol Plant. 1988;74:566-74.
22. McDowell NG. Mechanisms linking drought, hydraulics, carbon metabolism, and vegetation mortality. Plant Physiol. 2011;155:1051-9.
23. Munné-Bosch S, Alegre L. Die and let live: leaf senescence contributes to plant survival under drought stress. Funct Plant Biol. 2004;31:203-16.
24. Hensel LL, Grbić V, Baumgarten DA, Bleecker AB. Developmental and age-related processes that influence the longevity and senescence of photosynthetic tissues in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1993;5:553-64.
25. Genty B, Meyer S. Quantitative mapping of leaf photosynthesis using chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Funct Plant Biol. 1995;22:277-84.
26. Baker NR, Oxborough K, Lawson T, Morison JI. High resolution imaging of photosynthetic activities of tissues, cells and chloroplasts in leaves. J Exp Bot. 2001;52:615-21.
27. Leipner J, Oxborough K, Baker NR. Primary sites of ozone-induced perturbations of photosynthesis in leaves: identification and characterization in Phaseolus vulgaris using high resolution chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. J Exp Bot. 2001;52:1689-96.
28. Oxborough K, Baker N. An instrument capable of imaging chlorophyll a fluorescence from intact leaves at very low irradiance and at cellular and subcellular levels of organization. Plant Cell Environ. 1997;20:1473-83.
29. Hogewoning SW, Harbinson J. Insights on the development, kinetics, and variation of photoinhibition using chlorophyll fluorescence imaging of a chilled, variegated leaf. J Exp Bot. 2007;58:453-63.
30. Calatayud A, Roca D, Martínez P. Spatial-temporal variations in rose leaves under water stress conditions studied by chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2006;44:564-73.
31. Daley PF, Raschke K, Ball JT, Berry JA. Topography of photosynthetic activity of leaves obtained from video images of chlorophyll fluorescence. Plant Physiol. 1989;90:1233-8.
32. Lazár D, Sušila P, Nauš J. Early detection of plant stress from changes in distributions of chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters measured with fluorescence imaging. J Fluoresc. 2006;16:173-6.
33. Granier C, Aguirrezabal L, Chenu K, Cookson SJ, Dauzat M, Hamard P, et al. PHENOPSIS, an automated platform for reproducible phenotyping of plant responses to soil water deficit in Arabidopsis thaliana permitted the identification of an accession with low sensitivity to soil water deficit. New Phytol. 2006;169:623-35.
34. Boyes DC, Zayed AM, Ascenzi R, McCaskill AJ, Hoffman NE, Davis KR, et al. Growth stage-based phenotypic analysis of Arabidopsis: a model for high throughput functional genomics in plants. Plant Cell. 2001;13:1499-510.
35. Hartigan JA, Hartigan P. The dip test of unimodality. The Annals of Statistics. 1985;13:70-84.
36. Hartigan PM. Algorithm AS 217: Computation of the Dip Statistic to Test for Unimodality. J R Stat Soc: Ser C: Appl Stat. 1985;34:320-5.
37. Maechler M, Ringach D. diptest: Hartigan's dip test statistic for unimodality-corrected code. R package version 075-74. 2012. Available online at: http://CRANR-projectorg/package=diptest [Retrieved: January 4, 2013].
38. Nagode M. rebmix. An R Package for continuous and discrete finite mixture models. 2004.
39. Zhang C, Mapes BE, Soden BJ. Bimodality in tropical water vapour. Q J Roy Meteorol Soc. 2003;129:2847-66.
40. Demmig-Adams B, Adams Iii WW, Barker DH, Logan BA, Bowling DR, Verhoeven AS. Using chlorophyll fluorescence to assess the fraction of absorbed light allocated to thermal dissipation of excess excitation. Physiol Plant. 1996;98:253-64.
41. 2 evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77 K among vascular plants of diverse origins. Planta. 1987;170:489-504.
42. Bresson J, Varoquaux F, Bontpart T, Touraine B, Vile D. The PGPR strain Phyllobacterium brassicacearum STM196 induces a reproductive delay and physiological changes that result in improved drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2013;200:558-69.
43. Barbagallo RP, Oxborough K, Pallett KE, Baker NR. Rapid, noninvasive screening for perturbations of metabolism and plant growth using chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. Plant Physiol. 2003;132:485-93.
44. Chylla R, Garab G, Whitmarsh J. Evidence for slow turnover in a fraction of photosystem II complexes in thylakoid membranes. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics. 1987;894:562-71.
45. Chylla RA, Whitmarsh J. Light saturation response of inactive photosystem II reaction centers in spinach. Photosynth Res. 1990;25:39-48.
46. Cao J. Chlorophyll a fluorescence transient as an indicator of active and inactive photosystem II in thylakoid membranes. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics. 1990;1015:180-8.
47. Lavergne J, Leci E. Properties of inactive photosystem II centers. Photosynth Res. 1993;35:323-43.
48. Hoagland DR, Arnon DI. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif Agric Exper Stn Circ. 1950;347:1-32.
49. R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2009.
50. Fabre J, Dauzat M, Negre V, Wuyts N, Tireau A, Gennari E, et al. PHENOPSIS DB: an Information System for Arabidopsis thaliana phenotypic data in an environmental context. BMC Plant Biol. 2011;11:77.