Preference for cute infants does not depend on their ethnicity or species: Evidence from hypothetical adoption and donation paradigms

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2015, Pages

  Golle, Jessika ^a,b   Probst, Fabian ^a   Mast, Fred W ^a   Lobmaier, JanekS ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFRICAN; ARTICLE; CAUCASIAN; DECISION MAKING; ETHNICITY; FACIES; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS; PUPPY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; ANIMAL; BLACK PERSON; DOG; FACE; INFANT; INFANT CARE; PSYCHOLOGY; VISION; YOUNG ADULT;

CANIS FAMILIARIS;

ADULT; AFRICAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; ANIMALS; DOGS; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FACE; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT CARE; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84926663900     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121554     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Lorenz K. Die angeborenen Formen möglicher Erfahrung. [The innate forms of potential experience.]. Z Tierpsychol. 1943;5:94-125.
2. Glocker ML, Langleben DD, Ruparel K, Loughead JW, Gur RC, Sachser N. Baby schema in infant faces induces cuteness perception and motivation for caretaking in adults. Ethology. 2009;115:257-263. PMID: 22267884
3. Sternglanz SH, Gray JL, Murakami M. Adult preferences for infantile facial features-Ethological approach. Anim Behav. 1977;25:108-115. PMID: 855947
4. Karraker KH, Stern M. Infant physical attractiveness and facial expression-effects on adult perceptions. Basic Appl Soc Psych. 1990;11:371-385.
5. Stephan CW, Langlois JH. Baby beautiful-adult attributions of infant competence as a function of infant attractiveness. Child Dev. 1984;55:576-585. PMID: 6723448
6. Dion KK, Berscheid E, Walster E. What is beautiful is good. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1972;24:285-290. PMID: 4655540
7. Fullard W, Reiling AM. An investigation of Lorenz's "Babyness". Child Dev. 1976;47:1191-1193.
8. Ritter JM, Langlois JH. The role of physical attractiveness in the observation of adult child interactions-eye of the beholder or behavioral reality. Dev Psychol. 1988;24:254-263.
9. Langlois JH, Ritter JM, Casey RJ, Sawin DB. Infant attractiveness predicts maternal behaviors and attitudes. Dev Psychol. 1995;31:464-472.
10. Dion KK. Children's physical attarctiveness and sex determinants of adult punitiveness. Dev Psychol. 1974;10:772-778.
11. Elder GH, van Nguyen T, Caspi A. Linking family hardship to children's lives. Child Dev. 1985;56:361-375. PMID: 3987413
12. Badr LK, Abdallah B. Physical attractiveness of premature infants affects outcome at discharge from the NICU. Infant Behav Dev. 2001;24:129-133.
13. Glocker ML, Langleben DD, Ruparel K, Loughead JW, Valdez JN, Griffin MD, etal. Baby schema modulates the brain reward system in nulliparous women. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:9115-9115. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811620106 PMID: 19451625
14. Karraker KH, Vogel DA, Lake MA. Parents' gender-stereotyped perceptions of newborns: The eye of the beholder revisited. Sex Roles. 1995;33:687-701.
15. Lobmaier JS, Sprengelmeyer R, Witten B, Perrett DI. Female and male responses to cuteness, age and emotion in infant faces. Evol Hum Behav. 2010;31:16-21.
16. Volk AA, Quinsey VL. The influence of infant facial cues on adoption preferences. Hum Nature-Int Bios. 2002;13:437-455.
17. Luo LZ, Lee K, Li H. Are children's faces really more appealing than those of adults? Testing the baby schema hypothesis beyond infancy. J Exp Child Psychology. 2011;110:115-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp. 2011.04.002 PMID: 21536307
18. Hildebrandt KA, Fitzgerald HE. Gender bias in observers' perceptions of infant's sex: It's a boy most of the time. Percept Motor Skill. 1977;45:472-474.
19. Hildebrandt KA, Fitzgerald HE. Adults responses to infants varying in perceived cuteness. Behav Process. 1978;3:159-172. PMID: 686436
20. Hildebrandt KA, Fitzgerald HE. Facial feature determinants of perceived infant attractiveness. Infant Behav Dev. 1979;2:329-339.
21. Chin SF, Wade J, French K. Race and facial attractiveness: Individual differences in perceived adoptability of children. J Cult Evol Psychol. 2006;4:215-229.
22. Volk AA. Chinese infant facial cues. J Evol Psychol. 2009;7:225-240.
23. Golle J, Lisibach S, Mast FW, Lobmaier JS. Sweet puppies and cute babies: Perceptual adaptation to babyfacedness transfers across species. Plos One. 2013;8.
24. Little AC. Manipulation of infant-like traits affects perceived cuteness of infant, adult and cat faces. Ethology. 2012;118:775-782.
25. Nittono H, Fukushima M, Yano A, Moriya H. The power of kawaii: Viewing cute images promotes a careful behavior and narrows attentional focus. Plos One. 2012;7.
26. Sherman GD, Haidt J, Coan JA. Vieweing cute images increases behavioral carefulness. Emotion. 2009;9:282-282. doi: 10.1037/a0014904 PMID: 19348541
27. Parsons CE, Young KS, Parsons E, Dean A, Murray L, Goodacre T, etal. The effect of cleft lip on adults' responses to faces: Cross-species findings. Plos One. 2011;6.
28. Zebrowitz LA, Montepare JM, Lee HK. They don't all look alike: Differentiating same versus other race individuals. J PersSoc Psychol. 1993;65:85-101. PMID: 8355144
29. Yamamoto R, Ariely D, Chi W, Langleben DD, Elman I. Gender differences in the motivational processing of babies are determined by their facial attractiveness. Plos One. 2009;4.
30. Waller KL, Volk A, Quinsey VL. The effects of infant fetal alcohol syndrom facial features on adoption preference. Human Nature. 2003;15:101-117.
31. Volk AA, Lukjanczuk JM, Quinsey VL. Influence of infant and child facial cues of low body weight on adults' ratings of adoption preference, cuteness, and health. Inf Mental Hlth J. 2005;26:459-469.
32. Volk AA. The Influence of Infant Facial Cues on the Elicitation of Feelings of Patemal Care in Adults. Department of Psychology. National Library of Canada: Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario; 2001. p. 92.
33. Volk AA, Quinsey VL. Cues of high and low body weight negatively influence adults' perceptions and ratings in the hypothetical adoption paradigm. Scientific World Journal. 2006;6:1574-1582. PMID: 17160342
34. Hahn AC, Xiao DK, Sprengelmeyer R, Perrett DI. Gender differences in the incentive salience of adult and infant faces. Q J Exp Psychol. 2013;66:200-200. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.705860 PMID: 22928658
35. Sprengelmeyer R, Perrett DI, Fagan EC, Cornwell RE, Lobmaier JS, Sprengelmeyer A, etal. The cutest little baby face: A hormonal link to sensitivity to cuteness in infant faces. Psychol Sci. 2009;20:149-149. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02272.x PMID: 19175530
36. American Psychological Association. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist. 2002;57:1060-1073. PMID: 12613157
37. Hoffman L, Rovine MJ. Multilevel models for the experimental psychologist: Foundations and illustrative examples. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:101-117. PMID: 17552476
38. Bosker R, Snijders T. Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. 2nded. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2011.
39. McKelvey R, Zavoina W. A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. J Math Sociol. 1975;4:103-120.
40. Rhodes G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:199-226. PMID: 16318594
41. Weeden J, Sabini J. Physical attractiveness and health in western societies: A review. Psychol Bull. 2005;131:635-653. PMID: 16187849
42. Sprengelmeyer R, Lewis J, Hahn A, Perrett DI. Aesthetic and incentive salience of cute infantfaces: Studies of observer sex, oral contraception and menstrual cycle. Plos One. 2013;8.
43. Parsons CE, Young KS, Kumari N, Stein A, Kringelbach ML. The motivational salience of infant faces is similar for men and women. Plos One. 2011;6.
44. Cardenas RA, Harris LJ, Becker MW. Sex differences in visual attention toward infant faces. Evol Hum Behav. 2013;34:280-287.
45. Charles NE, Alexander GM, Saenz J. Motivational value and salience of images of infants. Evol Hum Behav. 2013;34:373-381.
46. Satterthwaite FE. An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bull. 1946;2:110-114. PMID: 20287815