Baby schema in infant faces induces cuteness perception and motivation for caretaking in adults

Ethology

Volumn 115, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 257-263

  Glocker, Melanie L ^a,b   Langleben, Daniel D ^b   Ruparel, Kosha ^b   Loughead, James W ^b   Gur, Ruben C ^b   Sachser, Norbert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; EYE; MORPHOLOGY; PARENTAL CARE; PERCEPTION; PHOTOGRAPH; STUDENT; SURVIVAL;

PSEUDOMUGIL;

EID: 59149098130     PISSN: 01791613     EISSN: 14390310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01603.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Alley, T. R. 1981 : Head shape and the perception of cuteness. Dev. Psychol. 17, 650 654.
2. Alley, T. R. 1983a : Growth-produced changes in body shape and size as determinants of perceived age and adult caregiving. Child Dev. 54, 241 248.
3. Alley, T. R. 1983b : Infantile head shape as an elicitor of adult protection. Merrill Palmer Q. 29, 411 427.
4. Alley, T. R. Baron, R. M. 1986 : Young adults' caregiving and the age level of a potential recipient. J. Psychol. 120, 567 580.
5. Berman, P. W. 1980 : Are women more responsive than men to the young? A review of developmental and situational variables. Psychol. Bull. 88, 668 695.
6. Berman, P. W., Cooper, P., Mansfield, P., Shields, S. Abplanal, J. 1975 : Sex differences in attraction to infants - when do they occur? Sex Roles 1, 311 318.
7. Bowlby, J. 1969 : Attachment and Loss, Vol 1: Attachment. Hogarth, London.
8. Brooks, V. Hochberg, J. 1960 : A psychophysical study of "cuteness". Percept. Mot. Skills 11, 205.
9. Casey, R. J. Ritter, J. M. 1996 : How infant appearance informs: child care providers' responses to babies varying in appearance of age and attractiveness. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 17, 495 518.
10. Chin, S. F., Wade, T. J. French, K. 2006 : Race and facial attractiveness: individual differences in perceived adoptability of children. J. Cult. Evol. Psychol. 4, 215 229.
11. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. 1989 : Human Ethology. De Gruyter, New York.
12. Enlow, D. 1982 : Handbook of Facial Growth, 2nd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia.
13. Farkas, L. G. 1994 : Anthropometry of the Head and Face, 2nd edn. Raven Press, New York.
14. Fullard, W. Reiling, A. M. 1976 : An investigation of Lorenz's "babyness". Child Dev. 47, 1191 1193.
15. Gould, S. J. 1979 : Mickey Mouse meets Konrad Lorenz. Nat Hist 88, 30 36.
16. Hildebrandt, K. A. Fitzgerald, H. E. 1978 : Adults' responses to infants varying in perceived cuteness. Behav. Processes 3, 159 172.
17. Hildebrandt, K. A. Fitzgerald, H. E. 1979 : Facial feature determinants of perceived infant attractiveness. Infant Behav. Dev. 2, 329 339.
18. Hildebrandt, K. A. Fitzgerald, H. E. 1981 : Mothers' responses to infant physical appearance. Infant Ment. Health J. 2, 56 64.
19. Hrdy, S. B. 2005 : Evolutionary context of human development: The cooperative breeding model. In : Attachment and Bonding: A New Synthesis (Carter, S. C., Ahnert, L., Grossmann, K., Hrdy, S. B., Lamb, M. E., Porges, S. W. Sachser, N., eds). MIT Press, Cambridge, pp. 9 32.
20. Hueckstedt, B. 1965 : Experimentelle Untersuchungen zum "Kindchenschema"/Experimental investigations on the "Kindchenschema" (baby-schema). Z. Exp. Angew. Psychol. 12, 421 450.
21. Karraker, K. H. Stern, M. 1990 : Infant physical attractiveness and facial expression: effects on adult perceptions. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. 11, 371 385.
22. Keating, C. F., Randal, D. W., Kendrick, T. Gutshall, K. A. 2003 : Do babyfaced adults receive more help? The (cross-cultural) case of the lost resume J. Nonverbal Behav. 27, 89 109.
23. Koyama, R., Takahashi, Y. Mori, K. 2006 : Assessing the cuteness of children: significant factors and gender differences. Soc. Behav. Pers. 34, 1087 1100.
24. Langlois, J. H., Ritter, J. M., Casey, R. J. Sawin, D. B. 1995 : Infant attractiveness predicts maternal behaviors and attitudes. Dev. Psychol. 31, 464 472.
25. Lorenz, K. 1943 : Die angeborenen Formen moeglicher Erfahrung. Z. Tierpsychol. 5, 235 409.
26. Maestripieri, D. Pelka, S. 2002 : Sex differences in interest in infants across the lifespan: a biological adaptation for parenting? Hum. Nat. 13, 327 344.
27. Maier, R. A., Holmes, D. L., Slaymaker, F. L. Reich, J. N. 1984 : The perceived attractiveness of preterm infants. Infant Behav. Dev. 7, 403 414.
28. McKelvie, S. J. 1993 : Perceived cuteness, activity level, and gender in schematic babyfaces. J. Soc. Behav. Pers. 8, 297 310.
29. Ritter, J. M., Casey, R. J. Langlois, J. H. 1991 : Adults' responses to infants varying in appearance of age and attractiveness. Child Dev. 62, 68 82.
30. Schleidt, M., Schiefenhovel, W., Stanjek, K. Krell, R. 1980 : "Caring for a baby" behavior: reactions of passersby to a mother and baby. Man-Environment. Systems 10, 73 82.
31. Stephan, C. W. Langlois, J. H. 1984 : Baby beautiful: adult attributions of infant competence as a function of infant attractiveness. Child Dev. 55, 576 585.
32. Sternglanz, S. H., Gray, J. L. Murakami, M. 1977 : Adult preferences for infantile facial features: an ethological approach. Anim. Behav. 25, 108 115.
33. Volk, A. Quinsey, V. L. 2002 : The influence of infant facial cues on adoption preferences. Hum. Nat. 13, 437 455.