Are children's faces really more appealing than those of adults? Testing the baby schema hypothesis beyond infancy

Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Volumn 110, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 115-124

  Luo, Li Zhu ^a,b   Li, Hong ^a,b   Lee, Kang ^c,d  

^a BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF POSTS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS   (China)

^b SOUTHWEST UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d University of California   (United States)

Author keywords

Baby schema; Cuteness; Face age; Face attractiveness; Face likeability; Face processing; Kindchenschema

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTITUDE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; DECISION MAKING; ESTHETICS; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRESCHOOL CHILD;

AGE FACTORS; ATTITUDE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CUES; ESTHETICS; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; JUDGMENT; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL;

EID: 79957607891     PISSN: 00220965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Alley T.R. Head shape and the perception of cuteness. Developmental Psychology 1981, 17:650-654.
2. Alley T.R. Infantile head shape as an elicitor of adult protection. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 1983, 29:411-427.
3. Anzures G., Ge L., Wang Z., Itakura S., Lee K. Culture shapes efficiency of facial age judgments. PLoS One 2010, 5:e11679.
4. Bressan P., Bertamini M., Nalli A., Zanutto A. Men do not have a stronger preference than women for self-resemblant child faces. Archives of Sexual Behavior 2009, 38:657-664.
5. Brooks V., Hochberg J. A psychophysical study of " cuteness" Perceptual and Motor Skills 1960, 11:205.
6. Chin S.F., Wade T.J., French K. Race and facial attractiveness: Individual differences in perceived adoptability of children. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology 2006, 4:215-229.
7. Human ethology 1989, Aldine de Gruyter, New York. I. Eibl-Eibesfeldt (Ed.).
8. Enlow D.H. Handbook of facial growth 1982, J. B. Saunders, Philadelphia. 2nd ed.
9. Geldart S., Maurer D., Henderson H. Effects of the height of the internal features of faces on adults' aesthetic ratings and 5-month-olds' looking times. Perception 1999, 28:839-850.
10. Glocker M.L., Langleben D.D., Ruparel K., Loughead J.W., Gur R.C., Sachser N. Baby schema in infant faces induces cuteness perception and motivation for caretaking in adults. Ethology 2009, 115:257-263.
11. Hildebrandt K.A., Fitzgerald H.E. Adults' responses to infants varying in perceived cuteness. Behavioural Processes 1978, 3:159-172.
12. Hildebrandt K.A., Fitzgerald H.E. Adults' perceptions of infant sex and cuteness. Sex Roles 1979, 5:471-481.
13. Hueckstedt B. Experimentelle Untersuchungen zum " Kindchenschema" (Experimental investigations on the " Kindchenschema" ). Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie 1965, 12:421-450.
14. Karraker K.H., Stern M. Infant physical attractiveness and facial expression: Effects on adult perceptions. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 1990, 11:371-385.
15. Langlois J.H., Kalakanis L., Rubenstein A.J., Larson A., Hallam M., Smoot M. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin 2000, 126:390-423.
16. Langlois J.H., Ritter J.M., Casey R.J., Sawin D.B. Infant attractiveness predicts maternal behaviors and attitudes. Developmental Psychology 1995, 31:464-472.
17. Lee, K., Anzures, G., Quinn, P. C., Pascalis, O., & Slater, A. (in press). Development of face processing expertise. In A. J. Calder, G. Rhodes, J. V. Haxby, & M. H. Johnson (Eds.), Handbook of face processing. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Lobmaier J.S., Sprengelmeyer R., Wiffen B., Perrett D.I. Female and male responses to cuteness, age, and emotion in infant faces. Evolution and Human Behavior 2010, 31:16-21.
19. Lorenz K. Die angeborenen Formen möglicher Erfahrung (The innate forms of experience). Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 1943, 5:235-409.
20. Maier R.A., Holmes D.L., Slaymaker F.L., Reich J.N. The perceived attractiveness of preterm infants. Infant Behavior and Development 1984, 7:403-414.
21. McKelvie S.J. Perceived cuteness, activity level, and gender in schematic babyfaces. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 1993, 8:297-310.
22. Peskin M., Newell F.N. Familiarity breeds attraction: Effects of exposure on the attractiveness of typical and distinctive faces. Perception 2004, 33:147-157.
23. Platek S.M., Raines D.M., Gallup G.G., Mohamed F.B., Thomson J.W., Myers T.E., et al. Reactions to children's faces: Males are more affected by resemblance than females are, and so are their brains. Evolution and Human Behavior 2004, 25:394-405.
24. Powe T.G., Hildebrandt K.A., Fitzgerald H.E. Adults' responses to infants varying in facial expression and perceived attractiveness. Infant Behavior and Development 1982, 5:33-44.
25. Rhodes G.I. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology 2006, 57:199-226.
26. Ritter J.M., Casey R.J., Langlois J.H. Adults' responses to infants varying in appearance of age and attractiveness. Child Development 1991, 62:68-82.
27. Sprengelmeyer R., Perrett D.I., Fagan E.C., Cornwell R.E., Lobmaier J.S., Sprengelmeyer A., et al. The cutest little baby face. Differences in adults' sensitivity to cuteness in infant faces. Psychological Science 2009, 20:149-154.
28. Stephan C.W., Langlois J.H. Baby beautiful: Adult attributions of infant competence as a function of infant attractiveness. Child Development 1984, 55:576-585.
29. Sternglanz S.H., Gray J.L., Murakami M. Adult preferences for infantile facial features: An ethological approach. Animal Behavior 1977, 25:108-115.
30. Volk A.A. Chinese infant facial cues. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology 2009, 7:225-240.
31. Volk A.A., Lukjanczuk J.M., Quinsey V.L. Perceptions of child facial cues as a function of child age. Evolutionary Psychology 2007, 5:801-814.
32. Volk A., Quinsey V.L. The influence of infant facial cues on adoption preferences. Human Nature 2002, 13:437-455.