Wearable computing: Will it make people prosocial?

British Journal of Psychology

Volumn 106, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 209-216

  Nasiopoulos, Eleni ^a   Risko, Evan F ^b   Foulsham, Tom ^c   Kingstone, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attention; Eye movements; Social presence; Wearable computing

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; CLOTHING; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MICROCOMPUTER; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; CLOTHING; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MICROCOMPUTERS; MIDDLE AGED; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84926524819     PISSN: 00071269     EISSN: 20448295     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12080     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Baker, D. A., Schweitzer, N. J., & Risko, E. F. (2013). Perceived access to self-relevant information mediates judgments of privacy violations in neuromonitoring and other monitoring technologies. Neuroethics, 7, 43-50. doi:10.1080/15265160590960924
2. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., & Jolliffe, T. (1997). Is there a "language of the eyes"? Evidence from normal adults, and adults with autism or asperger syndrome. Visual Cognition, 4, 311-331. doi:10.1080/713756761
3. Birmingham, E., & Kingstone, A. (2009). Human social attention: A new look at past, present, and future investigations. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, 118-140. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04468.x
4. Buck, R., Losow, J. I., Murphy, M. M., & Costanzo, P. (1992). Social facilitation and inhibition of emotional expression and communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 962-968. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.962
5. Carver, C. S. (1979). A cybernetic model of self-attention processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1251-1281. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.8.1251
6. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1981). The self-attention-induced feedback loop and social facilitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 545-568. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(81)90039-1
7. Crosby, J. R., Monin, B., & Richardson, D. (2008). Where do we look during potentially offensive behavior? Psychological Science, 19, 226-228. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02072.x
8. Dale, R., & Vinson, D. W. (2013). The observer's observer's paradox. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 25, 303-322. doi:10.1080/0952813X.2013.782987
9. Duval, S., & Wicklund, R. A. (1972). A theory of objective self awareness. New York: Academic Press.
10. Emery, N. J. (2000). The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evaluation of social gaze. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 24, 581-604. doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(00)00025-7
11. Ernest-Jones, M., Nettle, D., & Bateson, M. (2011). Effects of images on everyday cooperative behavior: A field experiment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 172-178. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.10.006
12. Frischen, A., Bayliss, A. P., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 694-724. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.694
13. Guerin, B. (1986). Mere presence effects in humans: A review. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 38-77. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(86)90040-5
14. Herman, P. C., Roth, D. A., & Polivy, J. (2003). Effects of the presence of others on food intake: A normative interpretation. Psychological Bulleting, 129, 873-886. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.6.873
15. Kobayashi, H., & Kohshima, S. (1997). Unique morphology of the human eye. Nature, 387, 767-768.
16. Risko, E. F., & Kingstone, A. (2011). Eyes wide shut: Implied social presence, eye tracking and attention. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 73, 291-296. doi:10.3758/s13414-010-0042-1
17. Risko, E. F., Laidlaw, K. E. W., Freeth, M., Foulsham, T., & Kingstone, A. (2012). Social attention with real versus reel stimuli: Toward an empirical approach to concerns about ecological validity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 143. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00143
18. Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2007). God is watching you: Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18, 803-809. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01983.x
19. Sparks, A., & Barclay, P. (2013). Eye images increase generosity, but not for long: The limited effect of a false cue. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 317-322. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.05.001
20. Trull, T. J., & Ebner-Priemer, U. (2013). Ambulatory assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 151-176. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185510
21. Van Rompay, T. J. L., Vonk, D. J., & Fransen, M. L. (2009). The eye of the camera: Effects of security cameras on prosocial behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41, 60-74. doi:10.1177/0013916507309996