A qualitative study of how patients with type 2 diabetes use an electronic stand-alone personal health record

Telemedicine and e-Health

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 296-300

  Fuji, Kevin T ^a   Abbott, Amy A ^a,b   Galt, Kimberly A ^a,b,c,d  

^a CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PHARMACY AND HEALTH PROFESSIONS   (United States)

^b Creighton University School of Nursing   (United States)

^c CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

e health; medical records; mobile health; technology

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PRIVACY; HEALTH CARE; ITERATIVE METHODS; MHEALTH;

BEHAVIORAL CHANGES; HEALTH INFORMATIONS; MEDICAL RECORD; NEGATIVE EXPERIENCES; PATIENT EDUCATION; PERSONAL HEALTH RECORD; POSITIVE EXPERIENCES; PRIVACY AND SECURITY;

MEDICAL COMPUTING;

ADULT; AGED; COMPUTER SECURITY; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT SELECTION; PROCEDURES; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RISK ASSESSMENT; SELF CARE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TELEMEDICINE; UNITED STATES; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COMPUTER SECURITY; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; HEALTH RECORDS, PERSONAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT SELECTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RISK ASSESSMENT; SELF CARE; TELEMEDICINE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84926486121     PISSN: 15305627     EISSN: 15563669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0084     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes fact sheet: National estimates and general information on diabetes and prediabetes in the United States, 2011. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2011
2. CasagranDe S, Fradkin JE, Saydah SH, Rust KF, Cowie CC. The prevalence of meeting A1c, blood pressure, and LDL goals among people with diabetes, 1988-2010. Diabetes Care 2013;36:2271-2279
3. Grant RW, Wald JS, Poon EG, Schnipper JL, Gandhi TK, Volk LA, Middleton B. Design and implementation of a web-based patient portal linked to an ambulatory care electronic health record: Patient gateway for diabetes collaborative care. Diabetes Technol Ther 2006;8:576-586
4. Hess R, Bryce CL, Paone S, Fischer G, McTigue KM, Olshansky E, Zickmund S, Fitzgerald K, Siminerio L. Exploring challenges and potentials of personal health records in diabetes self-management: Implementation and initial assessment. Telemed J E Health 2007;13:509-517
5. Osborn CY, Mayberry LS, MulVaney SA, Hess R. Patient web portals to improve diabetes outcomes: A systematic review. Curr Diab Rep 2010;10:422-435
6. Nagykaldi Z, Aspy CB, Chou A, Mold JW. Impact of a wellness portal on the Delivery of patient-centered preventive care. J Am Board Fam Med 2012; 25:158-167
7. Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, Overhage JM, Sands DZ. Personal health records: Definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13:121-126
8. Wagner PJ, Dias J, Howard S, Kintziger KW, Hudson MF, Seol YH, Sodomka P. Personal health records and hypertension control: A randomized trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;19:626-634
9. American Health Information Management Association, American Medical Informatics Association. The value of personal health records: A joint position statement for consumers of health care. J AHIMA 2007;78:22-24
10. Detmer D, Bloomrosen M, Raymond B, Tang P. Integrated personal health records: Transformative tools for consumer-centric care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008;8:45
11. Kaelber DC, Jha AK, Johnston D, Middleton B, Bates DW. A research agenda for personal health records (PHRs). J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:729-736
12. Keckley PH, Coughlin S. Deloitte 2012 survey of U.S. health care consumers: The performance of the health care system and health care reform. Available at https://www.Deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-UnitedStates/Local%20Assets/Documents/Health%20Reform%20Issues%20Briefs/us-chs-IIssueBrie-2012ConsumerSurvey-061212.pdf (last accessed April 24, 2014).
13. Grant RW, Wald JS, Schnipper JL, Gandhi TK, Poon EG, Orav EJ, Williams DH, Volk LA, Middleton B. Practice-linked online personal health records for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2008;168: 1776-1782
14. Holbrook A, Thabane L, Keshavjee K, Dolovich L, Bernstein B, Chan D, Troyan S, Foster G, Gerstein H. Individualized electronic Decision support and reminDer to improve diabetes care in the community: COMPETE II randomized trial. CMAJ 2009;181:37-44
15. Johnson JA, Singal R. Impact of a web-based diabetes program and personal health record on diabetes quality of care. J Manag Care Med 2006;9:12-16
16. Ralston JD, Hirsch IB, Hoath J, Mullen M, Cheadle A, Goldberg HI. Web-based collaborative care for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009;32:234-239
17. TenforDe M, Nowacki A, Jain A, Hickner J. The association between personal health record use and diabetes quality measures. J Gen Intern Med 2012; 27:420-424
18. Archer N, Fevrier-Thomas U, Lokker C, McKibbon KA, Straus SE. Personal health records: A scoping review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:515-522
19. Ralston JD, Coleman K, Reid RJ, Handley MR, Larson EB. Patient experience should be part of meaningful-use criteria. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29: 607-613
20. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005;15:1277-1288
21. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes-2013. Diabetes Care 2013;36(Suppl 1):S11-S66
22. Fuji KT, Abbott AA, Galt KA, Drincic A, Kraft M, Kasha T. Standalone personal health records in the United States: Meeting patient Desires. Health Technol 2012;2:197-205
23. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2001
24. SanDelowski M. Sample size in qualitative research. Res Nurs Health 1995; 18:179-183
25. Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research Design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2013
26. Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J. Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2014
27. Agarwal R, AnDerson C, Zarate J, Ward C. If we offer it, will they accept? Factors affecting patient use intentions of personal health records and secure messaging. J Med Internet Res 2013;15:e43
28. Fuji KT, Galt KA, Serocca AB. Personal health record use by patients as perceived by ambulatory care physicians in Nebraska and South Dakota: A cross-sectional study. Perspect Health Inf Manag 2008;5:15
29. Wynia MK, Torres GW, Lemieux J. Many physicians are willing to use patients electronic personal health records, but doctors differ by location, genDer, and practice. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011;30:266-273
30. Smith PC, Araya-Guerra R, Bublitz C, Parnes B, Dickinson LM, Van Vorst R, Westfall JM, Pace WD. Missing clinical information during primary care visits. JAMA 2005;293:565-571
31. Witry MJ, Doucette WR, Daly JM, Levy BT, Chrischilles EA. Family physician perceptions of personal health records. Perspect Health Inf Manag 2010; 7:1d.
32. Tang PC, Lansky D. The missing link: Bridging the patient-proviDer health information gap. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;24:1290-1295
33. Kahn JS, Aulakh V, Bosworth A. What it takes: Characteristics of the iDeal personal health record. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28:369-376
34. Wynia M, Dunn K. Dreams and nightmares: Practical and ethical issues for patients and physicians using personal health records. J Law Med Ethics 2010;38:64-73