Measurement of myocardium at risk with cardiovascular MR: Comparison of techniques for edema imaging

Radiology

Volumn 275, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 61-70

  McAlindon, Elisa J ^a   Pufulete, Maria ^a   Harris, Jessica M ^a   Lawton, Christopher B ^a   Moon, James C ^b   Manghat, Nathan ^a   Hamilton, Mark C K ^a   Weale, Peter J ^c   Bucciarelli Ducci, Chiara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON HOSPITALS   (United Kingdom)

^c Siemens Healthcare Limited   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CARDIAC MAPPING SYSTEM; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HEART EDEMA; HEART INFARCTION; HEART SIZE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; INFARCT MYOCARDIAL EDEMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC USE; EDEMA, CARDIAC; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADOBUTROL; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND;

ADULT; AGED; CONTRAST MEDIA; EDEMA, CARDIAC; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; MYOCARDIUM; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84926475838     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14131980     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Pennell D. Myocardial salvage: retrospection, resolution, and radio waves. Circulation 2006;113(15):1821-1823.
2. Aletras AH, Tilak GS, Natanzon A, et al. Retrospective determination of the area at risk for reperfused acute myocardial infarction with T2-weighted cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: histopathological and displacement encoding with stimulated echoes (DENSE) functional validations. Circulation 2006;113(15):1865-1870.
3. Arai AE, Leung S, Kellman P. Controversies in cardiovascular MR imaging: reasons why imaging myocardial T2 has clinical and pathophysiologic value in acute myocardial infarction. Radiology 2012;265(1):23-32.
4. Desch S, Eitel I, De Waha S, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging parameters as surrogate endpoints in clinical trials of acute myocardial infarction. Trials 2011;12:204.
5. Simonetti OP, Finn JP, White RD, Laub G, Henry DA. "Black blood" T2-weighted inversion-recovery MR imaging of the heart. Radiology 1996;199(1):49-57.
6. Eitel I, Desch S, De Waha S, et al. Longterm prognostic value of myocardial salvage assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute reperfused myocardial infarction. Heart 2011;97(24):2038-2045.
7. Giri S, Chung YC, Merchant A, et al. T2 quantification for improved detection of myocardial edema. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2009;11:56.
8. Aletras AH, Kellman P, Derbyshire JA, Arai AE. ACUT2E TSE-SSFP: a hybrid method for T2-weighted imaging of edema in the heart. Magn Reson Med 2008;59(2):229-235.
9. Matsumoto H, Matsuda T, Miyamoto K, Shimada T, Mikuri M, Hiraoka Y. Peri-infarct zone on early contrast-enhanced CMR imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4(6):610-618.
10. Kitabata H, Imanishi T, Kubo T, et al. Coronary microvascular resistance index immediately after primary percutaneous coronary intervention as a predictor of the transmural extent of infarction in patients with STsegment elevation anterior acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2(3):263-272.
11. Payne AR, Casey M, McClure J, et al. Brightblood T2-weighted MRI has higher diagnostic accuracy than dark-blood short tau inversion recovery MRI for detection of acute myocardial infarction and for assessment of the ischemic area at risk and myocardial salvage. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4(3):210-219.
12. Verhaert D, Thavendiranathan P, Giri S, et al. Direct T2 quantification of myocardial edema in acute ischemic injury. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4(3):269-278.
13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999;8(2):135-160.
14. Flett AS, Hasleton J, Cook C, et al. Evaluation of techniques for the quantification of myocardial scar of differing etiology using cardiac magnetic resonance. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4(2):150-156.
15. Eitel I, Desch S, Fuernau G, et al. Prognostic significance and determinants of myocardial salvage assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute reperfused myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55(22):2470-2479.
16. Raman SV, Simonetti OP, Winner MW 3rd, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance with edema imaging identifies myocardium at risk and predicts worse outcome in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55(22):2480-2488.
17. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;105(4):539-542.
18. Friedrich MG, Sechtem U, Schulz-Menger J, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in myocarditis: a JACC white paper. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53(17):1475-1487.
19. Thiele H, Schindler K, Friedenberger J, et al. Intracoronary compared with intravenous bolus abciximab application in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the randomized Leipzig immediate percutaneous coronary intervention abciximab IV versus IC in ST-elevation myocardial infarction trial. Circulation 2008;118(1):49-57.
20. Francone M, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Carbone I, et al. Impact of primary coronary angioplasty delay on myocardial salvage, infarct size, and microvascular damage in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: insight from cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54(23):2145-2153.
21. Abdel-Aty H, Schulz-Menger J. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance T2-weighted imaging of myocardial edema in acute myocardial infarction. Recent Patents Cardiovasc Drug Discov 2007;2(1):63-68.
22. Abdel-Aty H, Tillmanns C. The use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute myocardial infarction. Curr Cardiol Rep 2010;12(1):76-81.
23. Friedrich MG. Tissue characterization of acute myocardial infarction and myocarditis by cardiac magnetic resonance. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008;1(5):652-662.
24. Beyers RJ, Smith RS, Xu Y, et al. T.-weighted MRI of post-infarct myocardial edema in mice. Magn Reson Med 2012;67(1):201-209.
25. Payne AR, Berry C, Kellman P, et al. Brightblood T (2)-weighted MRI has high diagnostic accuracy for myocardial hemorrhage in myocardial infarction: a preclinical validation study in swine. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4(6):738-745.
26. Eitel I, Friedrich MG. T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute cardiac disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011;13:13.
27. Croisille P, Kim HW, Kim RJ. Controversies in cardiovascular MR imaging: T2-weighted imaging should not be used to delineate the area at risk in ischemic myocardial injury. Radiology 2012;265(1):12-22.
28. Oshinski JN, Yang Z, Jones JR, Mata JF, French BA. Imaging time after Gd-DTPA injection is critical in using delayed enhancement to determine infarct size accurately with magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2001;104(23):2838-2842.
29. Arai AE. Magnetic resonance imaging for area at risk, myocardial infarction, and myocardial salvage. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 2011;16(3-4):313-320.
30. Kim RJ, Chen EL, Lima JA, Judd RM. Myocardial Gd-DTPA kinetics determine MRI contrast enhancement and reflect the extent and severity of myocardial injury after acute reperfused infarction. Circulation 1996;94(12):3318-3326.
31. Hedström E, Engblom H, Frogner F, et al. Infarct evolution in man studied in patients with first-time coronary occlusion in comparison to different species: implications for assessment of myocardial salvage. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2009;11:38.
32. Sjögren J, Ubachs JF, Engblom H, Carlsson M, Arheden H, Heiberg E. Semi-automatic segmentation of myocardium at risk in T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012;14:10.
33. Schulz-Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J, et al. Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) board of trustees task force on standardized post processing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013;15:35.
34. Ferreira VM, Piechnik SK, Dall'Armellina E, et al. Non-contrast T1-mapping detects acute myocardial edema with high diagnostic accuracy: a comparison to T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012;14:42.