Effects of land use on riparian birds in a semiarid region

Journal of Arid Environments

Volumn 119, Issue , 2015, Pages 61-69

  Lee, Myung Bok ^a   Rotenberry, John T ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Agriculture; Detectability; Riparian ecosystems; Semiarid landscapes; Spatial autocorrelation; Spatial scale; Urbanization

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BIRD; LAND USE; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; RIPARIAN ZONE; SEMIARID REGION; SPECIES DIVERSITY; URBAN DEVELOPMENT;

UNITED STATES;

AVES;

EID: 84926462987     PISSN: 01401963     EISSN: 1095922X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Augustin N.H., Mugglestone M.A., Buckland S.T. An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife. J.Appl. Ecol. 1996, 33:339-347. 10.2307/2404755.
2. Allan J.D. Landscape and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2004, 35:257-284. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.120202.110122.
3. Ambuel B., Temple S.A. Area-dependent changes in the bird communities and vegetation of southern Wisconsin forests. Ecology 1983, 64:1057-1068. 10.2307/1937814.
4. Beale C.M., Lennon J.J., Yearsley J.M., Brewer M.J., Elston D.A. Regression analysis of spatial data. Ecol. Lett. 2010, 13:246-264. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01422.x.
5. Blair R.B. Birds and butterflies along an urban gradient: surrogate taxa for assessing biodiversity?. Ecol. Appl. 1999, 9:164-170. 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0164:BABAAU]2.0.CO;2.
6. Bolger D.T., Scott T.A., Rotenberry J.T. Breeding bird abundance in an urbanizing landscape in coastal southern California. Conserv. Biol. 1997, 11:406-421. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96307.x.
7. Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information-theoretic Approach 2002, Springer-Verlag, New York.
8. Czech B., Krausman P.R., Devers P.K. Economic associations among causes of species endangerment in the United States. BioScience 2000, 50:593-601. 10.1641/00063568(2000)050[0593:EAACOS]2.0.CO;2.
9. Debano L.F., Baker M.B. Riparian ecosystems in southwestern United States. Ecology and Management of Forests, Woodlands, and Shrublands in the Dryland Regions of the United States and Mexico: Perspectives for the 21st Century 1999, 107-120. University of Arizona-Cento de Investigaciones Biologicas del Noroeste-USDA Forest Serves. P.F. Ffolliott, A. Ortega-Rubio (Eds.).
10. Donovan T.M., Jones P.W., Annand E.M., Thompson F.R. Variation in local-scale edge effects: mechanisms and landscape context. Ecology 1997, 78:2064-2075. 10.2307/2265945.
11. Dunford E., Freemark K. Matrix matters: effects of surrounding land uses on forest birds near Ottawa, Canada. Landsc. Ecol. 2004, 20:497-511. 10.1007/s10980-004-5650-5.
12. Ehrlich P.R., Dobkin D.S., Wheye D. The Birder's Handbook: a Field Guide to the Natural History of North American Birds 1988, Simon and Schuster, New York.
13. Evens J.M., Klein A.N. Anew model for conservation planning: vegetation mapping in western Riverside County. Fremontia 2006, 34(2):11-18.
14. Fahrig L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2003, 34:487-515. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419.
15. Fortin M.-J., Dale M. Spatial Analysis 2005, (Cambridge, New York).
16. Freemark K.E., Merriam H.G. Importance of area and habitat heterogeneity to bird assemblages in temperate forest fragments. Biol. Conserv. 1986, 36:115-141. 10.1016/0006-3207(86)90002-9.
17. Graham C.H., Blake J.G. Influence of patch-and landscape-level factors on bird assemblages in a fragmented tropical landscape. Ecol. Appl. 2001, 11:1709-1721. 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[1709:IOPALL]2.0.CO;2.
18. Hennings L.A., Edge W.D. Riparian bird community structure in Portland, Oregon: habitat, urbanization, and spatial scale patterns. Condor 2003, 105:288-302. 10.1650/0010-5422(2003)105[0288:RBCSIP]2.0.CO;2.
19. Hornor E.R. California cities, Towns, and Counties 1972-1996 1972-1996, Information Publications, Palo Alto, CA.
20. Jones K.B., Slonecker E.T., Nash M.S., Neale A.C., Wade T.G., Hamann S. Riparian habitat changes across the continental United States (1972-2003) and potential implications for sustaining ecosystem services. Landsc. Ecol. 2010, 25:1261-1275. 10.1007/s10980-010-9510-1.
21. Karr J.R., Roth R.R. Vegetation structure and avian diversity in several New World areas. Am. Nat. 1971, 105:423-435. 10.1086/282735.
22. Knopf F.L., Samson R.B. Scale perspectives on avian diversity in western riparian systems. Conserv. Biol. 1994, 8:669-676.
23. Klute D., Lovallo M., Tzilkowski W. Autologistic regression modeling of American woodcock habitat use with spatially dependent data. Predicting Species Occurrences: Issues of Accuracy and Scale 2002, 335-343. Island Press, Washington, D.C. J.M. Scott, P.J. Heglund, M.L. Morrison, J.B. Haufler, M.G. Raphael, W.A. Wall, F.B. Sampson (Eds.).
24. Kristan W.B. The role of habitat selection behavior in population dynamics: source-sink systems and ecological traps. Oikos 2003, 103:457-468. 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12192.x.
25. Legendre P. Spatial autocorrelation - trouble or new paradigm. Ecology 1993, 74:1659-1673. 10.2307/1939924.
26. Luther D., Hilty J., Weiss J., Cornwall C., Wipf M., Ballard G. Assessing the impact of local habitat variables and landscape context on riparian birds in agricultural, urbanized, and native landscapes. Biodivers. Conserv. 2008, 17:1923-1935. 10.1007/s10531-008-9332-5.
27. MacKenzie D., Nichols J.D., Royle J.A., Pollock K.H., Bailey L.A., Hines J.E. Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence 2006, Elsevier, Burlington.
28. Martin T.G., McIntyre S., Catterall C.P., Possingham H.P. Is landscape context important for riparian conservation? Birds in grassy woodland. Biol. Conserv. 2006, 127:201-214. 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.08.014.
29. Marzluff J.M. Island biogeography for an urbanizing world: how extinction and colonization may determine biological diversity in human-dominated landscapes. Urban Ecosyst. 2005, 8:155-175. 10.1007/s11252-005-4378-6.
30. Marzluff J.M., Rodewald A.D. Conserving biodiversity in urbanizing areas: nontraditional views from a bird's perspective. Cities Environ. 2008, 1:1-27.
31. McKinney M.L. Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst. 2008, 11:161-176. 10.1007/s11252-007-0045-4.
32. Miller J.R., Wiens J.A., Hobbs N.B., Theobald D.M. Effects of human settlement on bird communities in lowland riparian areas of Colorado (USA). Ecol. Appl. 2003, 13:1041-1059. 10.1890/1051-0761(2003)13[1041:EOHSOB]2.0.CO;2.
33. Moore J.E., Swihart R.K. Modeling patch occupancy by forest rodents: incorporating detectability and spatial autocorrelation with hierarchical structured data. J.Wildl. Manag. 2005, 69:933-949. 10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069[0933:MPOBFR]2.0.CO;2.
34. National Research Council Riparian Areas: Functions and Strategies for Management 2002, The National Academic Press, Washington, D.C.
35. Ohmart R.D., Anderson B.W. North American desert riparian ecosystems. Reference Handbook on the Deserts of North America 1982, 433-479. Greenwood Press, Connecticut. G.L. Bender (Ed.).
36. Ohmart R.D. The effects of human-induced changes on the avifauna of western riparian habitats. Stud. Avian Biol. 1994, 15:273-285.
37. Oneal A.S., Rotenberry J.T. Scale-dependent habitat relations of birds in riparian corridors in an urbanizing landscape. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2009, 92:264-275. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.05.005.
38. Pennington D.N., Hansel J., Blair R.B. The conservation value of urban riparian areas for landbirds during spring migration: land cover, scale, and vegetation effects. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 14:1235-1248. 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.02.021.
39. PRBO (Point Reyes Bird Observatory) Point Count Veggie (Relevé) Protocol 2002, (Retrieved 07. 25. 13). http://data.prbo.org/cadc2/index.php?page=prbo-point-count-veggie-protocol.
40. Ralph C.J., Geupel G.R., Pyle P., Martin T.E., DeSante D.F. Handbook of Field Methods for Monitoring Landbirds (General Technical Report PSW-GRT-144) 1993, Pacific Southwest Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Department of Agriculture.
41. Rangel T.F., Diniz-Filho J.A.F., Bini L.M. SAM: a comprehensive application for spatial analysis in Macroecology. Ecography 2010, 33:46-50. 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.06299.x.
42. RHJV (Riparian Habitat Joint Venture) Version 2.0. The Riparian Bird Conservation Plan: a Strategy for Reversing the Decline of Riparian Associated Birds in California. California Partners in Flight 2004, Available at:. http://www.prbo.org/calpif/pdfs/riparian.v-2.pdf.
43. Robertson B.A., Hutto R.L. Aframework for understanding ecological traps and an evaluation of existing evidence. Ecology 2006, 87:1075-1085. 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1075:AFFUET]2.0.CO;2.
44. Robinson S.K., Holmes R.T. Foraging behavior of forest birds: the relationships among search tactics, diet, and habitat structure. Ecology 1982, 63:1918-1931. 10.2307/1940130.
45. Rodewald A.D., Bakermans M.H. What is the appropriate paradigm for riparian forest conservation?. Biol. Conserv. 2006, 128:193-200. 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.041.
46. Rottenborn S.C. Predicting the impacts of urbanization on riparian bird communities. Biol. Conserv. 1999, 88:289-299. 10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00128-1.
47. Saab V. Importance of spatial scale to habitat use by breeding birds in riparian forests: a hierarchical analysis. Ecol. Appl. 1999, 9:135-151. 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0135:IOSSTH]2.0.CO;2.
48. Smith C.M., Wachob D.G. Trends associated with residential development in riparian breeding bird habitat along the Snake River in Jackson Hole, WY, USA: Implications for conservation planning. Biol. Conserv. 2006, 128:431-446. 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.10.008.
49. Trammell E.J., Weisberg P.J., Bassett S. Avian response to urbanization in the arid riparian context of Reno, USA. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2011, 102:93-101. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.03.013.
50. Webber H.J. History and Development of the Citrus Industry 1967, University of California Division of Agricultural Sciences, Davis, California.
51. White M.D., Greer K.A. The effects of watershed urbanization on the stream hydrology and riparian vegetation of Los Peñasquitos Creek, California. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2006, 74:125-138. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.11.015.
52. Wood E.M., Johnson M.D., Garrison B.A. Quantifying bird-habitat using a relevé method. Trans. West. Sect. Wildl. Soc. 2010, 46:25-41.