Individual differences in attention influence perceptual decision making

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 6, Issue FEB, 2015, Pages

  Nunez, Michael D ^a   Srinivasan, Ramesh ^a,b   Vandekerckhove, Joachim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b University of California at Irvine   (United States)

Author keywords

Diffusion models; Electroencephalography (EEG); Hierarchical Bayesian modeling; Individual differences; Perceptual decision making; Phase locking; Steady state visual evoked potential (SSVEP)

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926459494     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00018     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Batchelder, W. H. (2010). "Cognitive psychometrics: using multinomial processing tree models as measurement tools," in Measuring Psychological Constructs: Advances in Model-Based Approaches, ed S. Embretson (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association), 71-93. doi: 10.1037/12074-004.
2. Bridwell, D. A., and Srinivasan, R. (2012). Distinct attention networks for feature enhancement and suppression in vision. Psychol. Sci. 23, 1151-1158. doi: 10.1177/0956797612440099.
3. Bridwell, D. A., Hecker, E. A., Serences, J. T., and Srinivasan, R. (2013). Individual differences in attention strategies during detection, fine discrimination, and coarse discrimination. J. Neurophysiol. 110, 784-794. doi: 10.1152/jn.00520.2012.
4. Cassey, P., Gaut, G., Steyvers, M., and Brown, S. (2014). "A simple accumulator model that simultaneously accounts for behaviour and spike-train data," in Paper Presented at the 55th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society (Long Beach, CA).
5. Delorme, A., Sejnowski, T., and Makeig, S. (2007). Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis. Neuroimage 34, 1443-1449. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.004.
6. Ding, J., Sperling, G., and Srinivasan, R. (2006). Attentional modulation of SSVEP power depends on the network tagged by the flicker frequency. Cereb. Cortex 16, 1016-1029. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj044.
7. Forstmann, B. U., Anwander, A., Schäfer, A., Neumann, J., Brown, S., Wagenmakers, E.-J., et al. (2010). Cortico-striatal connections predict control over speed and accuracy in perceptual decision making. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 15916-15920. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004932107.
8. Garcia, J. O., Srinivasan, R., and Serences, J. T. (2013). Near-real-time feature-selective modulations in human cortex. Curr. Biol. 23, 515-522. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.02.013.
9. Gelman, A., and Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat. Sci. 7, 457-472. doi: 10.1214/ss/1177011136.
10. Jolliffe, I. T. (1982). A note on the use of principal components in regression. Appl. Stat. 31, 300-303. doi: 10.2307/2348005.
11. Krishnan, L., Kang, A., Sperling, G., and Srinivasan, R. (2013). Neural strategies for selective attention distinguish fast-action video game players. Brain Topogr. 26, 83-97. doi: 10.1007/s10548-012-0232-3.
12. Lee, M. D. (2008). Three case studies in the Bayesian analysis of cognitive models. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 15, 1-15. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.1.1.
13. Lee, M. D., and Newell, B. J. (2011). Using hierarchical Bayesian methods to examine the tools of decision-making. Judg. Decis. Making 6, 832-842.
14. Link, S., and Heath, R. (1975). A sequential theory of psychological discrimination. Psychometrika 40, 77-105. doi: 10.1007/BF02291481.
15. Müller, M. M., Picton, T. W., Valdes-Sosa, P., Riera, J., Teder-Sälejärvi, W. A., and Hillyard, S. A. (1998). Effects of spatial selective attention on the steady-state visual evoked potential in the 20-28 hz range. Cogn. Brain Res. 6, 249-261. doi: 10.1016/S0926-6410(97)00036-0.
16. Morgan, S., Hansen, J., and Hillyard, S. (1996). Selective attention to stimulus location modulates the steady-state visual evoked potential. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 93, 4770-4774. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.10.4770.
17. O'Connell, R. G., Dockree, P. M., and Kelly, S. P. (2012). A supramodal accumulation-to-bound signal that determines perceptual decisions in humans. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 1729-1735. doi: 10.1038/nn.3248.
18. Olitsky, S., Lee, H., and Young, E. (2013). IVAC-interactive visual acuity chart. Available online at: http://www.smbs.buffalo.edu/oph/ped/IVAC/IVAC.html (Accessed December 13, 2013).
19. Plummer, M. (2003). "JAGS: a program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling," in Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Distributed Statistical Computing (DSC 2003), (Vienna, Austria).
20. Ratcliff, R., Thapar, A., and McKoon, G. (2001). The effects of aging on reaction time in a signal detection task. Psychol. Aging 16:323. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.16.2.323.
21. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychol. Rev. 85:59. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.85.2.59.
22. Regan, D. (1977). Steady-state evoked potentials. JOSA 67, 1475-1489. doi: 10.1364/JOSA.67.001475.
23. Rosenblum, M. G., Pikovsky, A. S., and Kurths, J. (1996). Phase synchronization of chaotic oscillators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76:1804. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.1804.
24. Rouder, J. N., Lu, J., Speckman, P., Sun, D., and Jiang, Y. (2005). A hierarchical model for estimating response time distributions. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 12, 195-223. doi: 10.3758/BF03257252.
25. Sazonov, A. V., Ho, C. K., Bergmans, J. W., Arends, J. B., Griep, P. A., Verbitskiy, E. A., et al. (2009). An investigation of the phase locking index for measuring of interdependency of cortical source signals recorded in the EEG. Biol. Cybern. 100, 129-146. doi: 10.1007/s00422-008-0283-4.
26. Stone, M. (1960). Models for choice-reaction time. Psychometrika 25, 251-260. doi: 10.1007/BF02289729.
27. Tallon-Baudry, C., Bertrand, O., Delpuech, C., and Pernier, J. (1996). Stimulus specificity of phase-locked and non-phase-locked 40 hz visual responses in human. J. Neurosci. 16, 4240-4249.
28. Tuerlinckx, F., Maris, E., Ratcliff, R., and De Boeck, P. (2001). A comparison of four methods for simulating the diffusion process. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 33, 443-456. doi: 10.3758/BF03195402.
29. Turner, B. M., Forstmann, B. U., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Brown, S. D., Sederberg, P. B., and Steyvers, M. (2013). A bayesian framework for simultaneously modeling neural and behavioral data. Neuroimage 72, 193-206. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.048.
30. Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F., and Lee, M. (2008). "A Bayesian approach to diffusion process models of decision-making," in Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (Austin, TX), 1429-1434.
31. Vandekerckhove, J., Verheyen, S., and Tuerlinckx, F. (2010). A crossed random effects diffusion model for speeded semantic categorization decisions. Acta Psychol. (Amst) 133, 269-282. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.10.009.
32. Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F., and Lee, M. D. (2011). Hierarchical diffusion models for two-choice response times. Psychol. Methods 16, 44. doi: 10.1037/a0021765.
33. Vandekerckhove, J. (2014). A cognitive latent variable model for the simultaneous analysis of behavioral and personality data. J. Math. Psychol. 60, 58-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2014.06.004.
34. Voss, A., Rothermund, K., and Voss, J. (2004). Interpreting the parameters of the diffusion model: an empirical validation. Mem. Cogn. 32, 1206-1220. doi: 10.3758/BF03196893.
35. Wabersich, D., and Vandekerckhove, J. (2013). Extending JAGS: a tutorial on adding custom distributions to JAGS (with a diffusion model example). Behav. Res. Methods 46, 15-28. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0369-3.
36. Wagenmakers, E.-J., Ratcliff, R., Gomez, P., and McKoon, G. (2008). A diffusion model account of criterion shifts in the lexical decision task. J. Mem. Lang. 58, 140-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.04.006.
37. Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2009). Methodological and empirical developments for the ratcliff diffusion model of response times and accuracy. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 21, 641-671. doi: 10.1080/09541440802205067.